We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Statutory right? Yes.Fundamental right? No.
2. Improve public health infrastructure. Increase the budget of health and offset maybe from other items that are not immediately necessary.
3. Create a ministry to strategize and take centralized action on climate change, global warming and other urgent environmental concerns on a priority basis.
4. Reduce governmental interference in educational institutions, and ensure academic freedom in all institutions of higher learning. Give better allocation of resources to all NLUs in an equitable and distributive manner. Help to push up NLUs that are struggling.
5. Bring in lane discipline, strict traffic rules, enforce anti-corruption and vigilance mechanisms, and work towards safer roads and better public infrastructure.
You want us to save time sheets? Maybe don’t promise stupid and stretched stuff. Simple.
So sick
2. Organising and planning: This should address your exam difficulty. Plan your essays in advance. Essentially, a form of 'rough working'. Just draw up a list of points you will cover in each section of your answer ('Introduction' will mention 1, 2, 3, body Part A will mention these three points etc.) - a very brief plan. You can do it as a list, a spider diagram... whatever you prefer. Then just follow the plan. This can apply to your projects as well. Using the three weeks example above, your plan can include what you will write on a particular day (i.e., which part of your project you will deal with).
3. Planning and using your time well: Ensure you have mastered information about your exam pattern very well. For example, if you have a 3 hour exam, and you have to answer two questions, you know that you should be spending no more than 1.5 hours on each question. Plan in such a way as to ensure that you aren't 'borrowing' time between one question and another (e.g., still working on your first question at 1 hour and 34 minutes). If you use your time well, you could easily finish both questions (producing well-written answers) within 1 hour 15 minutes, and could have a considerable amount of time to review your paper as well.
But as they say there isn't smoke without some fire.
Anyone have a different view?
https://www.news18.com/amp/videos/breaking-news/west-bengal-news-calcutta-high-court-cancels-muslim-reservation-under-obc-sub-category-news18-8900372.html
Received such a non-response from CNLU Patna and UNICEF Patna Office.
Were the end products really that bad? Because the work cannot be deemed as classified. No state secret.
Contrast this with NLSIU. Several of their sponsored projects are available online.
Also what is the scope for the area generally? Is it worth getting into such a niche practice area?
Do the partners at these firms primarily or rather only consider the relative importance of the person through whom the candidate has reached out to them? I know the question seems inappropriate but I am frustrated with the sheer hypocrisy as people with experience are simply not being given a chance (on the pretext of being too senior) and on the other hand inexperienced/people with little to no practical experience are rather preferred.
And is it a good time to move away from competition law as the practice does not seem promising despite all the amendments.
I've been wanting to get into law firms for a few months now, and I'm a little lost as to if it's even possible. Honestly at this point I'm up for even an assessment internship if it means I can get my foot in through the door. Does anyone know of anyone else who's worked in-house and manged to transfer to firms later? Or of firms who might be open to hiring people with limited experience in Bangalore? I'm not even thinking about T1 or T2 or anything, just a decent firm where I can learn is more than enough. Any ideas about what I should study? M&A I have worked with, but VC is a mystery to me tbh.
Any help or advise or a point in the right direction will be extremely appreciated.
Any news??
Funding - more than any NLU or multiple NLUs combined, which enables good conferences and centre work.
Reputation - CAM is mass recruiter, and all alumni have become top partners at Indus, KCo, CAM, SAM, TT&A, AZB so no internship or job issues.
Infra - bad but liveable
Food - 3 days good, 2 days worst and 2 days bearable
Overall: Amazing college to be in.. good job prospects, if you can build your own knowledge well, it serves as good platform.
Ppl are completely mixing up "arrest" with "conviction". The purpose of JC is only in cases the accused can tamper evidence, influence witnesses etc. In cases where the evidence is already at hand (such as CCTV etc.) bail is the norm. If the accused is convicted, he will serve the sentence for the offence. Denial of bail as a tool to "punish" is one of the most atrocious features of our criminal justice system. How many undertrials languish in JC without their trial proceeding at all - this should shock your conscience. Instead, base minded uncultured ppl seem to take vicarious pleasure in the sufferings of others.