We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Personally, I've found the JNLUD to be interesting. I read it regularly though not fully. There's indconlawphil, but that's not really it.
Still good enough to read The Caravan, India Today, Economic Times & Times of India etc.
However, one issue that has persisted, as rightly pointed out by Anirudh in his tweet, is the very same culture of loud-mouthed left-oriented students trying to push down any ideology they don't agree with, which has not only persisted but has gotten entrenched in the GB as a whole. The issue lies with the overall culture that is being propogated within the university and that needs to be countered with voices that arent necessarily RW but rather simply more open minded and tolerant.
2. How mutually exclusive are OS and AS. is it possible for somebody working with an AS senior to get OS work or vice versa.
3. Does an OS side adv have a better chance of expanding into criminal or AS matters as opposed to criminal/AS adv trying to expand into OS.
4. Who to contact for a position at chambers of OS seniors (do clerks/juniors have a say?) (entry barrier would be high because the association with the senior does not really end - is this true)
People shouldn’t take politics so seriously and it’s not a good look for a senior advocate to be ranting on Twitter non-stop. I hope he’s okay.
https://www.economist.com/asia/2026/05/11/indias-pricey-private-universities-want-to-take-on-the-ivy-league
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/indias-pricey-private-universities-want-take-ivy-league-w4sdc
Here you go
Ok. I know the reporter who has made this report in the Mumbai Mirror.
Which caused all this furore. He was previously with Mid Day.
One needs to only look at his previous articles, especially the one about the American Professor losing money. ▮▮. All I am saying is, if it was a ▮▮▮ ▮▮▮ reporter, I would have not had an issue.
Will he stop his multi nation trips?
Will his party folks stop moving in 100 car cavalcades when they go to their constituencies?
Will those big families close to him stop using 20 cars in their cavalcade?
Hell no. Hypocrisy rules.
All the advisories for the janta.
As far as skills - like any other area - have good research skills, know the latest updates in the area for examples how IT Rules have been periodically amended, the PROG Rules etc etc.
TMT is not a hype that will die lol, it's a growing sector.
You can hear more from an experienced partner in this podcast: https://youtu.be/i8nuVoesCJ8?si=Y3HcKNylsNFsH3yI
Some guidance please from skilled and experienced ass kissers.
Yes, Jindal Global Law School has moved to permanent online exams. The residential campus you're paying lakhs for? Optional. The academic rigour you're paying for? Gone.
Students haven't attended a single class. AI is writing their submissions. And everyone is cheating in exams: openly, knowingly, and without consequence.
The market has noticed. A partner at ▮▮▮ has already said they will no longer hire from Jindal because of the online exam policy.
This is a structural collapse of one of India's most expensive law schools.
Do your research before you pay. The Jindal that built its reputation is not the Jindal that exists today.
Also, while the college brand matters quite a bit, I don't think you should spend years after years behind it. It's an exam. You ace it-good. You don't- accept that it's not for you and move on. You have to work hard, if not for the exam then in college, and someway or the other, you will be awarded if you do. Just don't spend too much time chasing something, which could be the time you spend bettering yourself as a professional.
Thinking about career in policy but unsure there’s growth?
It might be a bit too technical for some readers but some highly techy lawyers might be having luck with similar approaches?
I reverse-engineered the APIs of SCC Online, Westlaw Classic, and Westlaw Asia, and made MCPs out of them. You need a subscription, as it's based on cookie-based authentication replay, but it works. You're kind of violating ToS, so don't abuse it, or else those guys will abuse you, and you don't want that. Don't try to scrape any of the closed DBs either. Thomson Reuters went rabid when ROSS Intelligence tried to pull it off; they had VC backing and still got crushed. You don't stand a chance. The MCP is also significantly faster than the actual SCC Online website; search and fetch take a fraction of the time, just to give you a sense of how well it performs. I use Playwright instances for mass-scale downloading of data and cookie capture. The Playwright instance has a keep-alive function; it simply keeps visiting pages every few minutes, and once a cookie is captured it stays valid for a good amount of time. Make sure to enforce proper rate limits, or you'll nuke your personal or institutional subscription.
You can do the same with AIR Online and The Hindu. I tested AIR Online with curl and direct API requests and it worked, but I didn't find much value in it, so I didn't bother adding it. I didn't try The Hindu, but the console does reveal an API key, so it should be theoretically possible. Added an Indian Kanoon MCP using their official API. Plus, there's a very popular library whose MCP you can use by donating to them, so it fetches books as well.
For the offline corpus, I downloaded every piece of legislation and report I could find, then rented some GPUs from E2E Networks (they're India-based and the rates are reasonable; note that you'll need to complete KYC on E2E before you can spin up compute). Use the PyTorch environment. It's the cleanest base to build the OCR pipeline on. Ran OCR first with Tesseract, which is very fast, and then for the files that had bad recognition I used Chandra LLM OCR, though its speed varies a lot (pro tip: make sure you're using vLLM and not HF). An L4 is sufficient for Tesseract, but for Chandra you'll want an A100. Don't waste time trying to run Chandra or Surya OCR on E2E's L4 instances; they have serious driver issues.
Structured everything into an FTS5 SQLite DB (FTS5 because it gives you better search capabilities), made an MCP out of it, and connected all of them to Claude Code CLI and opencode. There's a hierarchy in how the systems are queried: one is checked first, and if that doesn't satisfy the query, the next one is hit, and so on. The best part of this setup is that the cases are saved in .txt format, so the AI can actually read them, unlike what these sites do by serving non-machine-readable PDFs.
Modern frontier models can either handle 60-70 agents at once or, failing that, give you a 1-million-token context window. For instance, Kimi K2.6 can launch up to 300 agents but caps at a 256k token window, whereas Deepseek v4 Pro offers the full 1M context and can also launch multiple sub-parallel agents, just not as many as Kimi. Either way, you can research books, cases, and reports all at once with zero issues. That said, having 1M context doesn't mean you should fill it up; retrieval quality degrades as the window fills, so treat it as headroom, not a target. Also, don't try any parallel agent tomfoolery with Claude; you'll burn through your limit in under three minutes. Once the cases and material are saved, one agent is deployed per file, each saving its output in a separate folder in Markdown format, and finally one agent synthesizes everything. Opus 4.7 is the best pick for the final synthesis: it's the smartest model out there, and it'll consume very few tokens because the cheaper agents will have already chewed everything down and added the digestive aids. A final agent then checks the synthesis. The possibility of errors slipping through is low but real, which is exactly why humans still exist in the loop. Use Obsidian for reading the Markdown output, and make sure the Markdown is formatted properly so it converts cleanly to .docx via Pandoc.
On tooling, I suggest using opencode CLI, as you get access to opencode go, which is quite cheap. Claude Code eats tokens like anything; to do anything meaningful you'll need the $100/12000~ Max 5x plan, but ₹2000 pro plan will work if used cautiously. Codex CLI is also quite good with ChatGPT Plus. The usage limits are pretty generous even after they constrained them, especially compared to Claude. This workflow works best with CLI tools, not the apps of these platforms; I haven't tried the apps much, as it's just easier to work with these in the CLI. Also, adjust the reasoning capacity of the models based on the complexity of the work. Running Opus 4.7 on max reasoning will burn through your quota in minutes. Make sure you're using a custom directory and have custom instructions, such as telling the model to rely only on the supplied material, produce a review, and give the exact source.
A round of research can take anywhere from 30 minutes to 2 hours, depending on how many issues crop up, since the whole thing is still held together by duct tape, hopes, and wishes; that said, most issues resolve themselves in minutes. As for build time, I had a working knowledge of APIs and system architecture, which sped things up manifold. AI in the CLI also helps a lot with the build itself: even if you just hand it a HAR file, it'll reconstruct the API payloads for you. Took some doing, but scarce material and slogging through archaic portals stopped being the bottleneck.
That is why we built PaperSpaces (paperspaces.in), a free-to-use web app for listing lawyer-friendly flats and matching with potential flatmates.
- If you are looking for lawyer-friendly flats, just browse for them on PaperSpaces.
- If you are an existing tenant who has been living in a lawyer-friendly flat, use our Pass-the-Keys feature to pass on the flat to someone else and get paid a handoff fee for facilitating the transaction. Pass-the-Keys rewards stakeholders, not the brokers.
- Looking for potential flatmates? Whether you are looking to team up for a new place or fill an empty room in your current flat, use PaperSpaces instead of hundred WhatsApp messages and Instagram stories.
- Coming to town for an internship? Just go ahead and put up a short-stay requirement.
And because trust matters in housing, PaperSpaces helps you discover people with real community context. Want to connect with folks from your law school who are in the same boat as you? Set the filter and connect with them. The vibe matters.
Built simply to solve an everyday inconvenience for lawyers and law students. We are live in Delhi NCR now and expanding to major Indian cities soon.
Check out paperspaces.in and share it with anyone in law who might benefit! It is free-to-use, and we will try to keep it like that till we can. Reach out: Akhilesh Budhiraja @ akhileshbudhi@gmail.com
This college does not live to other T1(s) but also is better than T2(s).
“ specialists” LMAOOOOO, specialists in running a society badly
One of my friends has an internship lined up for July 2026.