We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
https://legal.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/industry/cam-partners-anchal-dhir-and-shubham-rastogi-join-anagram-partners-with-their-teams/130279931
My objection, however, is not to ideology itself. No political philosophy, be it left, centre, or right, is inherently malign. What matters is the calibre and integrity of those who profess it. On that count, contemporary Indian politics offers little reassurance. The traditional left is electorally irrelevant, while the broader left-of-centre space is burdened by a legacy of dubious stewardship: from the corruption-tainted tenure of Lalu Prasad Yadav to the dynastic and often troubling political ecosystems associated with Mulayam Singh Yadav, the governance controversies under Mayawati, and the criminal-political nexus epitomised by the late Atiq Ahmed.
Compounding this malaise is the persistent inability of Rahul Gandhi to articulate a compelling or credible alternative. His reliance on alliances with politically compromised actors (like some of the names mentioned above), coupled with the insistence on branding the coalition as “INDIA”, and the not so subtle coercion of public discourse to adopt this nomenclature, betrays a disquieting disconnect from political reality. It reflects not strategic acumen, but a reliance on symbolism in place of substance.
The difficulty with figures such as Kamra is more fundamental. There is a discernible asymmetry in his critique: while his satire relentlessly targets Narendra Modi, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), and the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), it remains conspicuously silent on the failings of the political actors he implicitly supports. This selective scrutiny lends the impression not of independent satire but of advocacy guided by a predetermined brief. Whether motivated by ideological alignment or patronage, the effect is the same: a narrative that champions one side while shielding it from equivalent examination.
And yet, even with this awareness, one cannot entirely dismiss his effectiveness. As a communicator, he possesses a remarkable ability to captivate and mobilize his audience. In that sense, he resembles a modern-day pied piper, leading his listeners with wit and conviction, even if the destination remains open to question. In a country like India, where the legal and political consequences of outspoken dissent can be significant, it is difficult to imagine anyone operating at this scale without substantial financial backing and the assurance of robust legal cover.
Served CAM Well…. REALLY he served? When will these people realise that they are NOT gods and people are NOT their servants. Pathetic.
AS, KA, BV, RS & AM: We changed the game, didn’t you see?
Karma !
Guts to quit. Don't be affected.
I already know enough of your character.
These kids will land up in the top of firms in India. Many will go on to study abroad and join law firms abroad. Their future is absolutely secure, much more than the future of even the top NLU grads from regular middle class families
So chill.
Privacy pillar is a privacy automation tool company and rather small. If you join you’ll work only around privacy automation and not laws. However i do understand we dont always have a choice and sometimes have to make do with what we can find.
Understandably, the new partner is not happy with his situation. He’s relying on interns and keeps on borrowing associates from other teams. I’m curious if anyone else has witnessed something like this.
Had a few questions around this:
1.Do partners typically take their clients along? What happens in cases where the client was originally referred by the old firm?
2. How do they handle fee mandates with clients when they move — do they renegotiate or just continue on similar terms?
3.How are conflicts managed, especially if the new firm already has clients who are competitors of the incoming partner’s clients?
4.What happens to the partnership / LLP agreement of the old firm, and how does onboarding in the new firm usually work?
I know it varies case to case, but would be great to understand what the usual market practice looks like.
I would like to emphasise that the NUJS administration gives students access to counselling faculties and has a zero-tolerance policy towards ragging.
Try to shift it to the mumbai or bangalore......
These NLUs are trying to move ahead, looking into their rear-view mirrors.