We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
KCO - 2
Keystone - 2
JSA - 1
Resolut - 1
Spice Route - 1
Wadia - 1
LKS - 2
ICICI - 1
KPMG - 1
Vedanta - 2
NGO - 1
1. how are the placments
2. how is the academics and other extracircular
3. considering it to be t2 will students find difficulty in finding jobs and all?
4.hows the senior junior interactions
pls if any seniors or current students could guide me on this it would be helpful thank you
Take a partial drop if needed, but understand that it is quite easy to get into most foreign LLM programs as they are just a cash grab so don't worry you won't dent your LLM chances by coming to NLUJ.
If I were you, I would definitely take NLUJ (over NUJS anyday) and work there to be at the top of the batch. Also keep in mind that dropping means losing one year that you could instead spend on gaining work experience post college - at the end of the days, our time here is finite.
From what I have heard and seen he's a giant in company law matters mainly in NCLT/NCLAT like Arun Kathpalia.
Are in house jobs actually the semi retirement places that law firm folks believe them to be?
Also, slightly arrogant of you to assume that you can crack SNAP easily. After XLRI and CAT, it's one of the toughest exams in India, also partly due to demand.
Also, UPSC is far far more harder than Judiciary. Judiciary is full of dumb people from top to bottom. Most judges are undeserving and inefficient people and most of them have tried UPSC and couldn't even succeed in cracking prelims when they were young.
That's the main reasons.
All I can find about this college on Legally India so far, is like 3-4 years old, and I love to hear about it now, taking into account:
1. Academic Curriculum
2. Extracurricular Support (Moots, Conferences, Publishing)
3. Peer Groups (How academically inclined they are to push you for better heights)
4. Societies (Strength of Societies is also important)
5. Admin
If any seniors from BO'30, BO'29, BO'28, BO'27, BO'26 could help out, ideally in the 2-3 latter batches, as they can actually tell the growth, virtue of them being in the college, for a longer time. I would love anybody's advice regardless, even from other NLUs, who've heard about HNLU. Thanks!
This is primarily on account of pay disparity and job profile- as my job is a back end job not focus on core law
In short, Kerala HC said no interference. Supreme Court affirmed it during an admission hearing. This is regular 26(1) stage shenanigans before a writ court that I have seen since 2012. Even if you bring the sectoral jurisdictional issues, that is as old as the PGNRB cases.
It is the CCI who is the main party defending a jurisdictional turf war, undoing the damage of constant misinterpretions of the Bharti judgement. The same thing has been pointed out repeatedly before in other cases and before other courts. The luck with the roster helps.
Even with a commercial lens, it got pushed to Kerala from Bombay after years. I am sure the investigation has been kept in abeyance. Was interim relief granted? So till now this has been a run around for Asianet. Now with settlements, if the parties smell a bad order, they can settle down the road. So this may not evolve into something precedent setting.
Ultimately, these are writ jurisdiction matters and not appeals. They are administrative in nature and barely involve competition law. A landmark case is one decided by the SC in India when you have statutory appeals. Most appeals are just parking matters in the SC pleading a legal issue already admitted for tagging.
Either ways its not like the SC registry remains a blackhole for competition cases. In abuse of dominance cases we still have not heard about NSE or DLF and its fast approaching two decades of distinguished and deliberate fumbling by all concerned. There are even judgements reserved never pronounced.
India is still figuring out the contours of competition law enforcement after 25 years. In less time than that the US made the Sherman Act, built schools of thought and decided to break up Standard Oil - that is 21 years from 1890 to 1911. Even the EU took just 16 years to get to the Conti Can. Competition law here is not serious. With this supposed landmark case we are still figuring out the basics of a rebate case.
React out to me at - nikhil@auctapace.in