We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
They anyway don't do anything good for nation
Please don't give examples
He Recently appeared for Adani in SC. Appears for Vedanta in selective cases. Almost only appears in Commercial matters or Constitutional matters with a commercial / financial tinge.
Had the opportunity to brief him, he was extremely sharp and no-nonsense.
I understand Legalogic is major player in Pune market, so folks kindly help in shedding some light with respect to lateral shift.
https://www.telegraphindia.com/amp/india/from-women-students-to-filmmakers-du-vice-chancellors-urban-naxal-brush-spares-none-prnt/cid/2126063
Sounds like another MP .....
What are your opinions on this. have seen large teams led by senior equity partners with many junior partners who are completely dependent on the senior for getting work. Especially in firms like SAM where the salaried partners run the show and handle all the execution so they barely get the time to do BD. They also seem like too complacent and can't get themselves out of the senior partner's umbrella.
Suggested Middle Ground Clauses
Here are some compromise options:
Option 1 - Modified Cooperation Clause:
"In the event of the Bank initiating recovery proceedings against the Landlord due to default in loan repayment in accordance with applicable law, the Lessee agrees to cooperate with lawful directions from the Bank, subject to the following conditions:
a) Lessee's lease rights and tenure shall continue to be honored by the Bank
b) Any rent redirection to the Bank shall be adjusted against Lessee's rental obligations to Landlord
c) Lessee shall receive 90 days' written notice before any possession proceedings
d) Lessee's right to peacefully conduct business shall not be disturbed during the subsistence of this agreement, subject to timely rent payments
e) All investments and fixtures installed by Lessee shall be protected and Lessee given reasonable time for removal if possession is required"
Option 2 - Conditional Cooperation:
"The Lessee acknowledges that the property is mortgaged to [Bank Name]. In case of default by the Landlord:
a) Lessee will cooperate with the Bank as per applicable law
b) Lessee may deposit rent with the Bank upon receiving written demand AND court order/legal directive
c) Such cooperation shall not prejudice Lessee's rights under this lease agreement
Bank shall provide Lessee minimum [6 months] notice before seeking possession
Lessee's business operations shall not be disrupted during the notice period, provided rent is paid as directed.
Option 3 - Escrow/Notice Based Approach:
"Recognizing the Bank's secured interest in the property, Lessee agrees that:
In case of written notice from the Bank regarding Landlord's loan default, Lessee will deposit subsequent rent in an escrow account
Rent will be released as per joint instructions of Landlord and Bank, or as per court directions
Lessee's lease term and rights shall remain protected
Minimum [180 days] notice shall be provided before any possession demand
Lessee reserves right to seek legal remedy to protect their investment and business interests.
To provide NOC, bank is asking tenant to add a clause to the rental agreement stating that "Lessee would render their cooperation in case any recovery action is initiated by the Bank against the Borrower/Mortgagor in future including handing over the peaceful possession of the leased premises to the Bank, if demanded by the Bank. In such case, Lessee has no objection to deposit the rent directly with the Bank, if there is a written demand by the Bank to that effect and they shall not question the same".
Lessee is not agreeing to add this in registration document. Now bank is not providing NOC and hence registration of rental agreement is pending. As per advise from a lawyer(he also acknowledged that bank's ask is valid one) I have sent a register post with delivery acknowledgement letter asking the company to agree and add the condition requested by bank in rental agreement for which they have not responded yet. Lessee over email confirms that they are not related with bank in any matter and I should work with bank to get NOC. They have invested for their business in the rented property and they respond as "Lessee will abide by whatever is as per law. Lessee will not be limited to act as per Law and lessee has all right to safeguard and protect their huge investment as per law."
Now, I sit between 2 corporate companies standing in their own terms and I am helpless in the situation. Can anyone suggest how to go forward from here? What are the implications of delay in registering the rental agreement (for no fault of mine)? Is the demand from bank valid one? Is the hold by the lessee a valid one? I can be reached at โฎโฎโฎ
โฎโฎโฎ?
Does any one have an idea aboht how much does Kochar & Co pay to it's Associates? An Associate with around 3 years of experience ?
The current batch of students owed over Rs 1.3 crores in pending hostel or mess dues. NKC has offered to raise the scholarship corpus while also installing AC systems in both the hostels for nearly Rs 4 crores. The PWD has already been awarded more than Rs 6 crores of contracts apart from the vertical extension of the academic block which will get extra set of elevators for an extra Rs 50 lacs. Reimbursement of moot court registration monies etc. Higher outlay for SJA and diluted scrutiny of advances made etc. Registrar will be the nodal point for most matters of SJA. Btw, the so called Rs 7 cr deficit is all fiction. The univ is floating on at least 16 crores of surplus and there is time more in reserves. All this will get highlighted in the EC on Oct 16.
SJA knows this. Hence to keep the sheep (that's us) grazing it issued hollowed ultimatum. But when the time comes, it would claim that student interests were upheld in its "strenuous negotiations" with NKC and therefore no more NKC eviction. Also if the EC wants NKC to stay on till Dec 31 or another extension thereafter what can the SJA do?
Now that you know what spiel is coming, choose wisely.
If you know of sticky stuff, kindly disclose.
The VC of NUJS would know since he was very much present in one such blacklisted and subsequently platinum washed institution. The Noojies have no idea who they are dealing with.