We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Privatisation = Loss of institutions they can their abuse power over
FDI = Foreign Influence in the BOD of any organization; stakeholdership of our corporations can be abused by powerful enemy countries who have huge monetary influence (china, usa) to our disadvantage
It is only the FDI system that holds some sort of relevance, other two modus are still mandates that carry significant advantages over their disadvantages.
I feel my work takes up a lot of time, and I feel I need atleast 5 more years to make a name for myself. But that would mean hitting my mid-30s.
I am not into having a kid or a family. A marriage is not a problem. But I don't want a spouse who pushes for kids. How do I deal with this feeling ?
What about you guys ? People who married or single? Are you preparing for a family life ? How do you handle career over personal life ?
Everyone who's outraging here basis social media, please go and read the actual order of the Court. Gives very specific directions to ensure wellbeing of dogs. The order was essentially to ensure that Government machinery comes in action but the arm chair activists without even reading it started outraging. Let me ask a question - the first day hearing cost in the SC would have exceeded 2 cr with the senior lineup who appeared. What stopped all these organisation's for all these years to actually make the shelters by spending this money. We wouldn't have been here. And before making a song and dance about vaccination and sterilization, go ahead and see the studies which say that sterilized strays become even more aggressive.
And yeah, try all this stray care while you actually have a stray or a pack of strays attacking a loved one or god forbid, a child. At that time, would love to see you lovingly pat the strays and offer whatever you offer to them.
That's the whole point of animal rights. Standing for creatures who are literally voiceless, not metaphorically voiceless.
Regarding the dog barking at night, this is how they act as natural watchman. They keep our cities safe by barking at suspicious people. Have you bothered to find out why the dog is barking?
Also, our cities originally belong to animals. Humans have overpopulated the planet and destroyed the habitat of animals, taking over their forests and converting them into urban jungles. We call monkeys and dogs as a menace, but we are the real menace.
On some levels, the general discourse that you hear around the ECM practice is true. The hours are gruelling, the work is fairly repetitive and boring and you’re almost always in a very high stress environment.
However, it’s not as bad as a lot of people will try to convince you. One important thing to note is that the ECM practice is growing at a really good pace in the country right now. A huge function of this is just the macro-economic environment we are in right now. The practice is very cyclical in nature. In bull-market quarters, you’ll be inundated with work and will barely have any time for yourself. However, in bear market conditions, you’ll be relatively more free (even more so than your friends in other relatively chiller teams). Another important factor is the money. Calling a spade a spade - most corporate lawyers get into the field for the money. Though the pay across teams is fairly similar (atleast in the beginning of your career) at most firms, the hikes across both fixed and variable components will generally be higher for ECM practices than some other large practice areas. There’s multiple reasons for this - growing economy, bulli-ish public market sentiments and the fact that utilisation and billable hours are huge factors in appraisals (for law firms).
I’d recommend you do a proper, rational pros and cons analysis before you make your mind about the practice area. Go in with no predispositions and biases - give it a fair shot. Personally, there are days when i hate my job and days where everything seems sorry of meh (sorry if you were looking for a more encouraging answer xD. Just trying to give you my honest opinion). All the best!
All this leading to a life with medical issues, mental health problems. Strictly Avoid.
▮▮▮
he doesn't personally interact with interns a lot, not sure about hiring freshers - unlikely
We built up State-Owned Enterprises — called the public sector in India. The sleeping sickness of socialism is now universally acknowledged, — but not officially in India. No less than 231 public sector enterprises are run by the Union Government, and 636 by the State Governments. These have been the black holes of our economy. There is a tidal wave of privatization sweeping across the world from Bangladesh to Brazil, but it has turned aside in its course and passed India by.
The most persistent tendency in India has been to have too much government and too little administration; too many laws and too little justice; too many public servants and too little public service; too many controls and too little welfare. From the very first decade of the republic the steel claws of the permit-licence-quota raj were laid upon the national economy, and even today their grip continues with insignificant relaxation.
Today the situation remains unchanged, – only the number of files has increased a thousandfold. Millions of manhours are wasted every day in coping with inane bureaucratic regulations and a torrential spate of amendments.
Legal redress is so time-consuming enough to make infinity intelligible. A lawsuit once started in India is the nearest thing to eternal life ever seen on this earth. Close to two million cases are pending in the eighteen High Courts alone, and more than 2,10,000 cases in the Supreme Court for admission or final hearing or miscellaneous relief.
India has 15 per cent of the world’s population, but only 1.5 per cent of the world’s income. In the four decades since we became a republic, our per capita income in real terms did not even double but increased by only 91 per cent. Today we are still the twenty-first poorest nation on earth.
Perceptive observers in foreign countries where Indians work and prosper are baffled by one question — how does India, with its great human potential and natural resources, manage to remain poor? The answer is that we are not poor by nature but poor by policy. You would not be far wrong if you called India the world’s leading expert in the art of perpetuating poverty.
Most of our politicians and bureaucrats, untainted by knowledge of development in the outside world, have no desire to search for genes of ideas which deserve to be called “a high-yielding variety of economics.” We are smugly reconciled to low yield from high ideals.
India is rattling — and rattling violently — with spare human capacity. More than 30 million are registered on our 840 Employment Exchanges. According to objective estimates, there must be at least 20 million other unemployed who are not registered.
In 1950, India ranked sixteenth in the list of exporting countries of the world; today it ranks forty-third. Using another yardstick, in 1950 India had 2.2 per cent of the world export market; today its share stands reduced to 0.45 per cent.
https://theprint.in/opinion/indian-liberals-matter/like-a-gambler-govts-squandered-indias-legacy-through-mindless-socialism-nani-palkhivala/2722087/
Cringe.
8 intl. PPOs
32 PPOs where? Does anyone know?
They showed data for the 21 Day Z placements, but the data for how many tier 1 PPOs were there is still not out.
I am confused of my career prospects. I have been working in a firm specialising in corporate and insolvency litigations before NCLT & NCLAT, though I love the practise and the work, i would love to do some tax litigation (indirect tax)
However, indirect tax seems to be a niche practise and doesn’t seem to pay off in the end. (Mind you, I am based out of Chennai so I really don’t have varied options in terms of law firms) Unless the GSTAT gets fully functioning, there would be more reason to shift to indirect tax as an inevitable boom of cases will happen once the tribunal gets functioning
The problem is that you don’t find lawyers practising both indirect tax and company & insolvency litigation, the closest thing you would fund are senior counsels but they practise almost every type of law so I am not keen on going through that route
So now I am at crossroads, I really don’t know what route shall I pursue
And your instinct is to turn it into some conspiracy theory ? Who benefits from peace ? The deep state ? Or just people who get to live ? Who benefits from wars ? Arms manufacturers.
I always thought Trilegal used the designation "Associate".
▮▮▮
1. WB govt bans it
2. Sibal defends in SC
3. SC halts for a bit, orders further cuts
I’m wondering if i should follow up with the HR or is it that Khaitan only reaches out when they’ve made a decision? and what is the approximate timeline for the same?
Would love to hear from others who’ve been through the process or know about it.
I’m a 3rd year law student trying to line up internships. Most of my past ones were basic research (with no real reviews on the research), clerical work, and I barely got to try drafting or anything hands-on.
Would love to know — where did you intern that actually felt worth it in terms of learning and real exposure? Firms, chambers, orgs — open to all.
I get that interns need to be proactive to get work, but I’m trying to figure out which places are known to give interns something meaningful to do. Drop your recommendations please!
@mods pls allow this. It's with my full consent and any mishap will be my responsibility.
https://thewire.in/government/hindol-mazumdar-spain-bengal-minister-bratya-basu-jadavpur-university
Two law students from a bangalore law college (who were appointed amicus curiae by a reputed justice) had helped the court in arriving at a focal point in question of law for determining the grant of bail in the present case.
The court in it's order had given them the credit, due to their assistance, the final paragraph.
www.barandbench.com/news/khcaa-objects-to-kerala-high-court-appointing-law-students-as-amici-curiae
Unsurprisingly, the Bar association of kerala high court has condemned this practice and sent a "strongly worded" letter to the CJ of HC
Their reason?
--That appointment of law students as amici undermines the active assistance given by the advocates appearing for the parties as well as the other advocates in the Court.
(Mind you, the kerala high court had taken the consent of advocates prior to appointing the 2 students as amicus)
--According to the letter, a KHCAA nominated advocate would best represent the advocates community.
www.livelaw.in/high-court/kerala-high-court/kerala-high-court-amicus-curiae-rules-khcaa-letter-chief-justice-301043
"The Judge ought to know that this Hon'ble Court is not a training institution for law students and encouraging 'growing buds' is the duty of the law school...If at all there is any duty on a Judge, it is to encourage young advocates at the Bar," reads the letter.
If not courts, then from where a aspiring junior is supposed to learn the practicality of litigation -
just the chambers?
just the registry?
just the treasury office?
just their seniors' drafts?
The same would definitely not happen at CAM or AZB, have seen people around rank 30 get placed year after year with them, of course having a strong profile otherwise.
Looking at the top pay masters of the industry. Came across Spice Route. As some have already indicated in previous posts, Spice Route appears to be quite transparent and, in fact, takes pride in their retainers/pay bands. Can any insider give an accurate/ actual pay being taken away by A0-A4, SAs, PAs/ Counsels this year?