We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
- The Antitrust Concern: The FTC argued that coordination among law firms on standardized DEI hiring metrics, demographic hiring pools, and candidate-sharing agreements violated competition laws, specifically Section 1 of the Sherman Act and Section 5 of the FTC Act.
- The Outcome: Under immense regulatory pressure, Diversity Lab dissolved and permanently ceased operations to avoid continued FTC antitrust investigations
The Two Sides of the Argument
- The Anti-DEI Argument: Opponents argue that if a law firm sets a quota, uses a diversity scorecard, or gives a hiring preference based on race or gender, it is no longer hiring purely on talent. They view this as illegal discrimination against highly qualified candidates who do not fit those specific diversity criteria.
- The Pro-DEI Argument: Supporters argue that the traditional legal system was never a true meritocracy to begin with. They believe that systemic biases, exclusive networking, and elite university pipelines naturally lock out talented people. In their view, DEI programs level the playing field so that actual merit can be spotted and rewarded, regardless of a person's background.
There is no 'right' answer for these things, follow your workplace's style guide.
Always had a liking for legal education but given some family crisis, it looked impossible back then that's why went with physics ( science background and I was much more comfortable with it)
This year gave my first attempt and got into nalsar
1)What can I expect?
2)Will my age be a hindrance?
3)I still can pass for 19-20 so I am more concerned about intership chances and other job oriented oppurtunities.
4) which exams can I keep as a backup of I am not accepted in T1, T2 firms , ( no UPSC) given most exams have a age barrier like sebi or some psus
It would be really helpful to get some valuable advice
Please
Again, this is only an observation as a 30 y/o, so don't be very bothered by it. But I hope you all do work hard in the upcoming placement season. Good luck!
An absolute gem of a person. Takes a keen interest in the lives of his team. Will always have your back. The perfect friend, teacher and role model.
Lala firms are always penny wise and pound foolish.
I am looking for guidance. I want to pursue corporate law in future and as of now I have secured admission at NUALS and Nirma. NUALS is on basis of nri seat so the fees is thrice the usual.
Should I opt for nuals or nirma, considering i want to do corporate?
That being said, NUALS has a much smaller batch size than Nirma which means lesser competition. You will find a few alma doing good as well, especially in BLR offices of law firms. Also, having the NLU tag might give you a slight edge over a private uni.
Do give this thread a read : https://www.legallyindia.com/convos/topic/182347-what-to-choose-between-sls-pune-and-nuals-kochi
The second comments appears helpful. Objectively, NUALS seems like the right choice. All the best! Work hard wherever you go.
For those who have used such softwares / platforms, which ones would you recommend? Claude Cowork, Lucio, Jurisphere or something else?
Please dont turn this into a hate thread against certain platforms or their team members. Just looking for some genuine advice - please help a fellow lawyer out
Fable 5 was the first model from Anthropic that deviates from their data retention policy, allowing them to retain and review all prompts for a period of 30 days, making it completely unusable for most legal work.
Probably a good idea to see which vendors advertised support for Fable 5 when it came out last month (ex: August, Spellbook, Juris) and make sure you avoid them too.
They have taken interviews since March and now recently in June too.
If anyone knows, please share