We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
๐๐๐
P.S. Itโs high time law schools removed Iyer from his pedestal. Apart from the dreadful language of high judgements, his Marxist dogma was regressive and harmful.
Do you think anyone will hire an accountant or an economist or a statistician or a physicist or an engineer who cannot do long division without a calculator?
Do you think anyone will hire a musician who cannot play instruments and or write songs and can only recycle what others have done through an AI program?
Or doctors who cannot diagnose or treat without running to AI?
I get that students are lazy- but when you cheat this way- youre only cheating yourself out of an education. Suit is ridiculous, should be thrown out of court.
1. Having graduated from a tier-3 college, first gen lawyer have struggled to make inroads in the corp. law scene. SO far, have around 1.5 years of PQE in boutique law firms but going ahead is seriously a tsk given my non-nlu credentials in a few job switches in the past.
2. I come from a middle class family, living in a tier 3 city so litigation is something I cannot look up to , obviously due to financial constraints as well as locational disadvantage.
3. Following from point no.2, doing foreign LLM or any masters degree would not be feasible for me as I know that it will only marginally increase my chances of getting a good job later on. Further, I cannot leave working on and earning as I have financial burdens over me as well.
What should I ideally do to in this predicament. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
First, tutorials are needed BECAUSE it has a humongous batch size. Tutorials are not required if batch sizes are smaller (say around 40ish).
Second, generally, tutorials are usually conducted by new Assistant Professors or Ph.D. students, not by senior faculty.
There is no need to eulogize anyone for trying to solve a problem that is an outcome of its own policies.
Pick up a hobby or something. I promise you no amount of preliminary learning is going to help you in a law firm. Just the basics, and the rest is learning on the job.
I thought that after getting a PPO I will chill, party hard and socialise with people around but it has been three months and I am bored and I feel I am getting rusty.
Since I will be joining the firm next year around July/ August (2025), I want you all to suggest something to pursue career wise. I am done with travelling and partying and I want to utilise my time effectively to further strengthen my career prospects.
I donโt want to do CS. Thinking of CFA but does it make sense? Please suggest me something.
Guys from 2025 batch, what are your plans for the free time?
moreover, there are many ex-tier 1 associates in judiciary now. some in fact left in just 6 months or 1 year to prepare.
I do get days and weeks off but sometimes without prior notice I am still expected to work on my days off. This uncertainty and lack of control over my time has made it very difficult to freely enjoy my time off. Having to carry a laptop everywhere I go like I am the busiest person in the world and still making peanuts as compared to other people working these many hours in other jobs is very disheartening. Further, I have had to opt put of every vacation my friends had planned for the past two years because either I am never free when they are or I can never avail holidays on a short notice. In short, my chill time is severely limited, most of the times because of my own mindset.
While I do understand that this job pays for my time and not my skills per se, its very depressing for 25 year old wanting to enjoy his/her youth. My body already feels like a 30 year old and my energy levels are moderately low. I worked very hard like my other colleagues to reach where I am, but having a life like this makes me wonder if I can ever have a good life. I might come across as naive and even entitled for starting this conversation and, more importantly, wanting a good life just because I worked hard. I understand that most of us working this job work really hard and face similar challenges in balancing work and life, so my problems are not extraordinary. The question I really want to ask, even if naively so, is does life ever get better? Will quitting my job help me?
Thank you.
https://www.theweek.in/theweek/cover/2022/05/20/i-have-been-walking-around-with-a-letter-of-resignation-says-bibek-debroy.html
It clearly mentions the Cambridge event and his own criticism of his actions.
Bibek, Ratna, and I have been friends since our Cambridge days 1977-1982. I accompanied Bibek to Clare College when he had his PhD viva. Ravi Kanbur, an external examiner from Oxford, asked Bibek to add a chapter to his thesis on information theory to illustrate its application to something more recognisably economics, in addition to examples of dowry market equilibrium conditions in India, information implications of Maoโs policy of making intellectuals help farmers to build furnaces, and another similar esoteric example I canโt remember.
Bibek, whose thesis had been praised by his supervisor, the great Frank Hahn, did not think Kanbur was fit to examine it. He opted for an MSc and refused revision. He was in a class of his own, with a fantastic breadth of eclectic interests. I worked closely with him from 1993 to 1998 on a UNDP-supported project. The $1 million project I managed was relatively large, so we created an acronym for a large project: Legal Adjustments and Reforms for a Globalising Economy (LARGE). After he completed that project, Bibek joined the Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Contemporary Studies at Manmohan Singh's prompting. Bibek and I organised inter-school debates, starting with NCR Delhi, then nationally and with South Asian entrants, in memory of Mahbub ul Haq. Bibek wrote a report on states that put Gujarat at the top of Indiaโs states on the dimension of โease of doing businessโ.
When the Chief Minister of Gujarat gloated about it, many Congress netas (but not Sonia Gandhi, as he told me then) were unhappy with him. Bibek felt that he had to quit. He joined the PHD Chamber of Commerce, which was lucky for him. There, he met Suparna. She transformed a somewhat self-effacing and eccentric person into someone worthy of joining the Delhi Durbar. Prime Minister Modi respected him as a Raja Rishi for his knowledge of the Itihasas, Vedas, and Puranas. I donโt think the PM took Bibekโs advice on economic policies, instead of expecting him to defend some bad ones. Individuals like Bibek get better with age, like whisky, wine and temple idols. Thatโs why it is such a loss to so many that he passed away so soon. I cherish fond memories of the time I could spend with him (much less after he teamed up with the PM). Bibek was inspiring, educative, and provoking to everyone who knew him. The grief of each of us is unique.
Although my grades were average, my mooting was exceptional. Won really reputed moots and had decent publications. More than day, my team was in-general very impressed of my candidature based on my day to day interaction.
Hence, my whole team pushed for my PPO.
Please rethink about criminal litigation - if for nothing else than the single reason that our Court's physical infrastructure is extremely pathetic for females. Most Courts don't even have clean wash-rooms (& am guessing that female wash-rooms are as bad as men's).
Salary and power-structures - others here have already commented well.
White collar crime/ POSH/ advisory may be a more appropriate and financially rewarding route.
https://www.reddit.com/r/notlegallyindia/s/yLjLLUFziw
Please be candid but mindful that you dont spready any baseless rumours.
I'll say that much
but let's hope for the positive since it's unlikely that it'll get changed now
Can you please help me find a mansion being leased at 30k a month in Noida? I am even willing to give 40k a month.