We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Some genuine perspectives would be truly useful
The current dean / head seems a social justice types.
Avoid at all costs.
I’m guessing FM Som will now get importance as he is a BJP member and even stood for elections once.
Maybe the BJP could create its own Aquilaw-type firm? Why not?
https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/all-about-nationalist-citizens-party-new-home-of-20-rebel-trinamool-mps-11636178/amp/1
https://www.instagram.com/shewly.kundu/
Compare that with a platform like Reddit, where moderation is largely reactive. It happens after publication, in response to community feedback, policy violations, or court/ government directives. LI moderates at both stages, before and after a post goes up. So if it already reviewed the content before publishing it, how can it then turn around and claim the protections of an intermediary?
For LI to credibly assert intermediary immunity, the whole platform would have to be fundamentally reimagined. Until then, it's really just a heavily moderated, heavily censored space for anonymous commentary, one that arguably carries content liability for every thread and post published on it.
Happy to be corrected if my understanding is flawed.
ICICI -2
TT&A Mumbai -1
Some inhouse -1
MAYBE 2-3 MORE but it won't be more than that
"What's so great about Swiss Patek watches when desi Sonata watches also tell the time?"
This exemplifies the logic of LI readers.🙄 Your comments against NSIU/Sudhir show that you don't believe in elitism, excellence and meritocracy.
I would be really grateful for any leads or names of firms that would be open to hiring because at this point I'm breaking from inside and I need some support very desperately. Even a salary of 20-25K/pm would suffice, so please feel free to make any suggestions you feel might be helpful.
I am not sure if waiting for a firm is wise, unless you are sure that you will have options to choose from in the near future.
Lend me your ears. Our voices are not heard, and we are invisible in the array of black and white. While I commend Legallyindia for being one of the only sources (the accuracy of information is disputable) in the Internet for information on the field of Corporate Laws, I believe the representation for the litigating community is nil and frankly the profession is commented upon quite condescendingly.
I want to build something similar just for us, just for those who aspire to go to court and "suffer for 10 years until they make money". I wonder whether people would take this seriously or whether this post will become a moment of laughter. Please tell me your thoughts on the same.
Can someone please tell me good partners who can give a good exposure in the field of commercial litigation?