Compat affirms explosives cartel but reduces fine to Rs 5.8 cr

Explosives
Explosives
Compat today reduced Rs 60 crore fines but dismissed appeals in favour of Amarchand-advised Coal India.

Compat affirms cartellisation finding but finds mitigating circumstances
Compat affirms cartellisation finding but finds mitigating circumstances
The Competition Appellate Tribunal (Compat) today reduced the fines but dismissed the appeals of nine explosives manufacturers against last year’s Competition Commission of India’s (CCI) Rs 60 crore penalty in favour of Coal India, which was advised by Amarchand Mangaldas.

Coal India had complained about cartellisation by explosive manufacturers controlling 75 per cent of the market entering into anti-competitive agreements and threatening a boycott of competitive reverse auctions for the procurement of explosives by Coal India.

In April 2012 the CCI unanimously fined 10 manufacturers around Rs 60 crore, or 3 per cent of their annual turnovers of the last three financial years, for violating the anti-cartellisation provisions of the Competition Act 2002 under Section 3(3)(b) (cartels attempting to limit or control supply) and 3(3)(d) - directly or indirectly rigging bids in auctions.

An Amarchand press release stated that today that the Compat passed a final order dismissing the appeals of nine of the manufacturers and upholding the section 3(3)(d) contravention:

Pursuant to an information filed by CIL, the CCI had conducted a detailed investigation, following which it passed an order imposing a total fine of approximately Rs 60 crores on the ten explosives manufacturers.

In its order today, the COMPAT dismissed the appeals upholding the violation of the Competition Act, but considering various mitigating factors, reduced the fine payable to 10% of the fine imposed by the CCI.

The fine would therefore be reduced Rs 5.8 crore, said Amarchand partner Shweta Shroff Chopra.

The team at the firm also included Delhi senior partner Pallavi Shroff, principal associate designate Harman Singh Sandhu, and associates Yaman Verma and Sreemoyee Deb for Coal India.

It is understood that a number of law firms and advocates, including AZB & Partners, Luthra & Luthra, Vaish Associates and PH Parekh acted for explosive manufacturers, which included Gulf Oil Corporation, Ideal Industrial Explosives, Solar Industries India, Blastec India, Indian Explosives, Emul Tek, Regenesis Industries & Techno Blasts India, Black Diamond Explosives, and Keltech Energies.

“We are happy with the outcome of the case,” commented Pallavi Shroff in the press release. “We hope that the Hon’ble Tribunal’s order is complied with.”

Comments

HK Observer 18 Apr 2013, 13:03
+1 -2
Amarchand on a roll as always and easily the busiest and most sought after firm in India. Good going guys !
Have to admit 18 Apr 2013, 19:28
+1 -2
The Amarchand competition team is thes best. All their Delhi folk are super knowledgable and nice.
Have to admit too 19 Apr 2013, 04:24
+1 -0
The fine was reduced from 60 crores to 5 crores for AZb, Luthra and Vaish clients. Have to admit AMarchand has the best PR machinery. Where are the names and quotes from the non amarchand firms!
Simple test 20 Apr 2013, 06:27
+1 -0
Lets see who appeals this order to determine who considers this a victory? If Coal India appeals, then you're right, Amarchand basically lost and has an excellent PR machinery. If one of the AZB, Luthra and Vaish clients appeals, then Amarchand won and you didn't understand what the case was about (and still maybe Amarchand also has the best PR machinery :-) )
Admitted 19 Apr 2013, 21:30
+0 -0
Maybe the other fins are running for cover because the original order was bad!!! Hahaha