Compat stays record $1.15bn fine on cement makers, orders 10% deposit in lawyer-heavy battle

Seth Dua advised the Builders Association of India (BAI) in the Competition Appellate Tribunal against 11 cement companies.

Steep competing demands: Rs 600+ crore
Steep competing demands: Rs 600+ crore
Seth Dua & Associates advised the Builders Association of India (BAI) in the Competition Appellate Tribunal (Compat), which today partly stayed the earlier penalty of Rs 6,300 crore but directed 11 cement companies and the Cement Manufacturers Association of India (CMAI) to deposit 10 per cent of the fine or lose their appeal.

The cement companies had appealed against the Competition Commission of India’s (CCI) order imposing a Rs 6,300 crore ($1.15bn) penalty – the highest in the watchdog’s history equal to 50 per cent of the companies’ average profits – after a complaint of cartelisation by BAI.

The Compat also held that the CCI’s earlier cease and desist order against the cement makers would continue.

Seth Dua designated senior advocate OP Dua, assisted by erstwhile Seth Dua partner Rahul Goel and senior associate Anu Monga until they joined Dhir & Dhir in March, acted for BAI, which had alleged that the cement companies and lobbyist CMAI had colluded in price fixing in 2009-2010 and 2010-2011. Dua was present in today’s hearing, according to Mint.

The 11 cement makers and the cement trade body claimed in their appeal that there had been a violation of natural justice principles by the CCI because the original order was signed by the CCI’s chairman who was not present at hearings.

The appellants also claimed that the parties had not been given adequate opportunity to cross-examine witnesses.

The Compat said that it would have to examine whether the CCI should be held to “strict judicial norms” or whether it was only an “advisory, regulatory or an expert body”, which would enable the chairman to sign orders despite not having been present throughout, and concluded:

Under such circumstances, we would chose to grant stay to the penalties, however with a condition that the appellants deposit 10% of the penalties inflicted. We make it clear that the deposit of the penalty should be within one month from today. We also make it clear that if the penalties are not so deposited, the appeal shall be treated as dismissed without further reference to the Court.

On 21 June 2012, the CCI held the companies guilty of cartelisation on the basis of their parallel, coordinated behavior on price, dispatch, and supplies and by underutilising production capacity to pressure supply in times of higher demand.

The cement companies were represented by a raft of senior counsel and law firms.

  1. Lafarge India: AZB & Partners
  2. Ambuja Cement: Amarchand Mangaldas
  3. ACC: Amarchand Mangaldas
  4. Cement Manufacturers Association: Pramod B Agarwala
  5. Ultratech: Parekh & Co.
  6. India Cements: Harishankar
  7. Jai Prakash Associates: Luthra & Luthra
  8. Binani Cement: Virender Goswami & Associates.
  9. Madras Cement: T Srinivas Murthy
  10. J K Cement: P K Bhalla
  11. Century Textile Industries: Pramod B Agarwala

DSK Legal partner Balbir Singh represented the CCI before the Compat.

A second case involving around 40 cement companies that was clubbed with the current case in the CCI after having been referred by the CCI’s predecessor, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission (MRTP), is also undergoing appeal in the Compat. In that case Shree Cements, represented by Khaitan & Co, was fined Rs 357 crore in June 2012.

Earlier this month the Compat, in the Board of Control of Cricket in India’s (BCCI) appeal against a CCI penalty, ordered the Indian Premier League (IPL) organiser to deposit 25 per cent of the total Rs 52 crore ($9.6m) penalty. Amarchand was advising the BCCI.

Click to read today’s cement Compat order

Photo by Mark Strozier

Comments

no press alert? 19 May 2013, 14:07
+3 -2
What a contrast in approach. Whereas amarchand bby screams from every roof top that they got a stay with 25 % deposit for bcci. Amss delhi nor for that matter it appears any of the other firms involved here appear to have issued a press release. And rightly so! empty vessels male the most noise!
what? 19 May 2013, 17:34
+1 -0
Yes there's nothing to brag about in the bcci matter, or even here (though at least in this case there have been extensive arguments) . Maybe the press releases should wait till final orders.
@ Prachi / Kian 20 May 2013, 10:36
+0 -0
I am confused by this line: "Seth Dua designated senior advocate OP Dua, assisted by erstwhile Seth Dua partner Rahul Goel and senior associate Anu Monga until they joined Dhir & Dhir in March, acted for BAI."

Is this supposed to mean: "OP Dua, designated senior advocate and [designation] at Seth Dua acted for BAI. Till March this year, he was assisted on the matter by erstwhile Seth Dua partner Rahul Goel and senior associate Anu Monga, who Dhir & Dhir in March."????
B&B 21 May 2013, 14:04
+0 -0
See the story on barandbench.

[ http://www.barandbench.com/content/compat-stays-rs-6307-crore-penalty-cement-companies-refuses-interfere-cci%E2%80%99s-%E2%80%9Ccease-and ]
Sr. Adv. in a law firm?? 20 May 2013, 10:36
+0 -0
Any idea on how a designated senior advocate is a law firm partner? Isn't there a bar on this?
What too? 24 May 2013, 16:32
+0 -0
Amarchand Delhi and Bombay representing separate clients on this??? The difference between this and bcci is not the percentage of deposit of penalty but a stay on the rest of the CCI order. Quite clear from the orders unless I am missing something in the internal amarchand politics of Delhi vs Mumbai!