Gaggar, Balbir Singh, others win vs Ravinder Narain, Salve: Upholding Compat Rs 630 cr DLF penalty

The Competition Appellate Tribunal (COMPAT) upheld for the owners’ associations of luxury housing projects over the Competition Commission of India’s (CCI) Rs 630 crore penalty on real estate giant DLF.

High rising penalties
High rising penalties
Gaggar & Associates won in the Competition Appellate Tribunal (COMPAT) for the owners’ associations of luxury housing projects Belaire, Park Palace and Magnolia where the Competition Commission of India’s (CCI) Rs 630 crore penalty on real estate giant DLF was upheld.

Gaggar partner Vaibhav Gaggar and advocates Garima Malhotra and Abhimanyu Chopra acted for the Belaire Owners’ Association and for Park Palace in the COMPAT as well as the CCI.

Balbir Singh, a partner at DSK Legal, was acting in a personal capacity as CCI’s counsel assisted by advocates Monica Benjamin and Abhishek Baghel.

In August 2011 the Belaire association had won in the CCI against DLF which, according to the CCI’s order, had abused its dominant market position in Gurgaon to get the association’s members to sign a “highly abusive” apartment buyers agreement, while last month the CCI fined DLF Rs 2.41 crore for not complying with its earlier order.

After hearing DLF’s March 2012 appeal COMPAT, however, asked the CCI to pass another stating the terms on which the Apartment Buyer’s Agreement needed to be modified. Consequently, the CCI passed a supplementary order on January 3 to modify DLF and Belaire’s members’ buyer agreement.

10 days after that order the CCI said that modifications suggested by it to the agreement between DLF and Belaire’s members would also be applicable to the case of Park Palace and Magnolia, as reported then by the PTI.

Advocate RK Khanna acted for Magnolia.

Ravinder Narain & Co senior partner Ravinder Narain with advocates Kanika Gombher, S Banthia and Namita Kaul acted for DLF, having instructed Harish Salve. DLF has said it would approach the Supreme Court against the CCI’s penalty.

Picture by Lime High Rises

Comments

DHC Advocate 19 May 2014, 12:36
+4 -4
Seriously good job by Gaggar and it's lawyers. It's a typical David vs Goliath story.
Hmm.. 19 May 2014, 14:00
+2 -1
Bit surprised as the CCI order did have some holes in it. But this is going to boost competition practice for lawyers !!
Jurist 20 May 2014, 04:50
+6 -1
Congratulations to Gaggar and also to Mr. M.L. Lahoty, who successfully argued on behalf of RWAs before CCI and set the ball rolling.

Luthra & Luthra was also advising DLF on this mammoth litigation. So even Harish Salve with the assistance of top tier law firm could not save DLF! Btw, the amount has gone upto 800 crore (630 crore + 9% interest p.a., since August 2011). Also the flat buyers will now be filling compensation applications before the COMPAT, so the amount is likely to go upto Rs. 1,000 crore.
DJ 20 May 2014, 06:52
+2 -4
Have known Vaibhav for a while, very dynamic and suave- nice win!
Hmm.. 20 May 2014, 17:20
+2 -1
Where are Ravinder Narains two Cambridge law-educated sons ? I notice that they don't involve themselves with these high profile competition-matters !
Saurabh 27 May 2014, 14:06
+0 -0
Magnolia was represented by Mr RAKESH KHANNA OF R K LAW OFFICES . The judgement has appreciated all his arguments which have actually contributed to the turn around in the case even after COMPAT rejected the argument of retrospective operation of the Sec 4 of the competition Act. You write up has failed to appreciate this.