IPOs are HOT again: Cyril BLR, AZB Delhi do $165m Cafe Coffee Day IPO with BakerMacs

In a week that’s seen a raft of companies hitting the markets, Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas Bangalore partner Arjun Lall has scooped the mandate advising Cafe Coffee Day on its Rs 1,150 crore initial public offering (IPO), with AZB & Partners and Baker & McKenzie acting for the banks.

AZB Delhi partner Madhurima Mukherjee with senior associate Agnik Bhattacharyya and associate Namita Das acted for the global book running lead managers Kotak Mahindra Capital, Citigroup Global Markets and Morgan Stanley.

BakerMacs’ India head Ashok Lalwani handled the international elements of the deal.

Comments

Name or alias 2 Jul 2015, 14:15
+6 -0
Not necessary to define initial public offering as IPO, as the defined term is not used elsewhere in the article. There is also a stray bracket, and it is always Rs. and no space between Rs. and the first numeral. Senior associate's' Agnik Bhattacharyya and who else?

Hell, puritans may even argue that 'that's' is 'that is', and not 'that has'. Yes, you can slap me now.
Why so Serious??? 3 Jul 2015, 06:43
+2 -0
LOL....only yesterday LI was commenting about writing skills.
kianganz 3 Jul 2015, 07:00
+2 -0
*Slap* :)

1. It's not a contract, so we don't need to define terms or use them again.

2. Stray bracket, correcting - a CMS error.

3. LI house style uses a space between Rs and the first numeral consistently.

4. Correcting the stray s.

5. As others have pointed out, that's can either be that has or that is. :)

Ok bye.
kianganz 3 Jul 2015, 07:03
+2 -1
Actually, since we are contractually nitpicking, IPO is used twice in the headline, so technically we should have defined IPO in the headline as it's the first occurrence.

Or we should have added a definitions section to the article ;)
Scooter- 3 Jul 2015, 11:49
+4 -0
Its bad karma to define in the headlines!
2007 2 Jul 2015, 19:26
+1 -0
Well bowling, Jim. Well bowling, Sua.
Hmmm 3 Jul 2015, 03:46
+1 -0
That's not the only way to use "that's". There's nothing wrong with using "that's" to mean "that has". That's been a fairly well-accepted usage of "that's" for a long time now. So, yes, I CAN slap you :-)
G-master 3 Jul 2015, 11:09
+1 -0
Shouldnt there be an oxford comma between Citigroup Global Markets and Morgan Stanley? #Okbye
kianganz 3 Jul 2015, 11:32
+2 -0
Oxford comma stylistically optional also na? :) #okbyetoo