Luthra, DLA win 12500 crore ONGC FPO against Amarchand, Crawford Bayley

Luthra & Luthra and DLA Piper have bagged the 12,500 crore ($2.75bn) follow-on share sale of ONGC, beating five other law firms in a competitive tender, with Amarchand Mangaldas Delhi winning the mandate for the bankers.

Luthra won the mandate late last month together with DLA, after pitching against Amarchand, Crawford Bayley, Fox Mandal, Khaitan & Co and J Sagar Associates (JSA).

Amarchand with Dorsey & Whitney, Crawford Bayley with Lovells and Luthra with DLA were shortlisted after the first round and Luthra submitted the lowest bid to win the role, which is understood to have been near Luthra’s roughly Rs 136 lakh bid that won the firm the Engineers India Limited (EIL) disinvestment.

The Luthra & Luthra team is understood to be led by capital markets partner Madhurima Mukherjee, managing associate Geeta Dhania and associates Abhiroop Lahiri, Raghavendra Singh and Debolina Saha, which is almost the same team that advised on the Coal India Limited disinvestment.

DLA’s team on the deal is led by Singapore-based partner Stephen Peeples.

Amarchand Delhi partner Prashant Gupta is understood to have won the mandate to advise the lead arranging banks Morgan Stanley, HSBC, Nomura, Citigroup, JM Financial Services, and Bank of America Merrill Lynch, that have submitted aggregate bids of Rs 1 according to the Economic Times.

Comments

Anonymous guest 4 Feb 2011, 00:35
+1 -1
Kian, im guessing it is 136 lakhs/ 1.36 crore and not 136 crores!!

[Thank you, indeed it is... -Ed]
Anonymous guest 4 Feb 2011, 00:56
+1 -1
The last line that states the combined bids to be worth Rs 1 seems incorrect too Kian.
Anonymous guest 4 Feb 2011, 02:09
+1 -0
except that lahiri was in amarchand for coal india.
Anonymous guest 4 Feb 2011, 03:42
+1 -1
# 1 get real - in the best private sector mandates fees at best go to Rs 80 lakhs. For a PSU mandate - luthra has got this at around Rs 13.6 lakhs - now it means that they will load some junior lawyers into the deal - (after all who cares for an ONGc!) amss wud charge 13.6 lakhs for some high quality advice let alone a IPO. Now - this is L1 bidding - the bids go to the lowest bidder (which means also the lowest quality provider !)
Anonymous guest 4 Feb 2011, 04:43
+1 -1
and now Lahri is in Luthra :-)
Anonymous guest 4 Feb 2011, 05:24
+0 -0
Is it even worth killing a bunch of junior associates for such unprofitable mandates-are these law firms stupid or am I missing something?
Anonymous guest 4 Feb 2011, 05:55
+0 -0
#4 get your facts right, the govt. first short lists on quality, then interviews each short listed firm there after appoints the Firm, based on points given for quality and cost. on many occasions in the past L1 has been rejected as they did not have the quality.
Anonymous guest 4 Feb 2011, 20:01
+0 -0
It seems bong brigade is flooding in Luthra !!
Anonymous guest 4 Feb 2011, 21:03
+0 -0
#8: guess they deserve it.
Anonymous guest 4 Feb 2011, 22:59
+0 -0
It is indeed true. With Coal India law firms have started this practice of aggreeing to really low mandates and then making junior associates suffer and compromise on quality. This rat race should be stopped and firms should stick to their standard pricing (for themselves and for the clients as well). I am sure if law firms take a call, they wont be taken for a ride by corporates.
Anonymous guest 5 Feb 2011, 02:15
+0 -0
Is there something wrong with the title of the story?

Somehow my head doesn't seem to follow on....

[Haha. Indeed, yes, and of no sense, typo in the headline. -Ed]
Anonymous guest 5 Feb 2011, 04:19
+0 -0
Hasn't Lahiri become extremely popular? Two comments on him!! Stop obsessing. :o
Anonymous guest 5 Feb 2011, 16:31
+0 -0
#12: during his stint at Calcutta, he was THE MAN for cap marks..
Anonymous guest 5 Feb 2011, 18:00
+0 -0
Lahiri must be good with his work.....otherwise he wouldn't have been entrusted with such transactions...
Anonymous guest 5 Feb 2011, 20:06
+0 -0
@ 14 Become mature, Lahiri is only an associate and not entrusted with such transactions.. there are partner/s/senior associate/s who have a much much greater role to play and review work of associates..
Anonymous guest 12 Feb 2011, 08:46
+0 -0
Get some sense #12, 13 & 14 - Lahiri is a kid. But something's for sure - his stars are on the rise, else he wouldn't have caught our attention :-)). #4: a) the number is 136 lacs - for DLA and L&L combined, I guess; and b) #7 is damn right - its the experience of doing similar deals which makes the difference. L1 is important and comes with its own baggage, but in a market where the Government has been a major issuer for the last couple of years, who doesn't a few such deals??
Anonymous guest 14 Feb 2011, 03:08
+0 -0
Lahiri is one of the smartest amongst the young brigade of cap markets lawyers. Let him be!!