Zero sum games: Indus gamble pays off, crushes into mega $1.1bn Zomato IPO for banks with CAM, JSA, Lathams

Cap markets very excited about Tomatoes these days
Cap markets very excited about Tomatoes these days

IndusLaw’s capital markets team, which had been poached nearly lock-stock-and-barrel from L&L Partners in 2019, has won its highest-profile mandate to date in its role for the banks on the upcoming and eagerly-awaited Zomato initial public offering (IPO).

The IPO might raise $1.1bn from its public offer, reported moneycontrol.

Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas partners Yash Ashar and Gokul Rajan, however, scored the mandate for Zomato itself, which the firm had worked with before on corporate matters and also advised on its exploration of floating in the US, rumoured possibly via via an SPAC (special purpose acquisition company).

IndusLaw partners Manan Lahoty and Abhiroop Lahiri got the mandate for the managers, including Kotak Mahindra Capital, Morgan Stanley, Credit Suisse, BofA Securities and Citi.

Latham & Watkins acted as international counsel to the issuer Zomato, led by Singapore-based India head and partner Rajiv Gupta.

J Sagar Associates (JSA) is acting for the selling shareholder Info Edge led by partner Rohitashwa Prasad with associate Aishwarya Abhijit.

Zero sum game?

Interestingly, our deals database had recorded JSA having acted for Info Edge on a $238m investment in 2018 though in 2019 L&L Partners had also acted on an $11.7m M&A transaction for the fund.

Update 19:39: We understand that L&L has also continued advising Info Edge on corporate matters since then and the capital markets team had even advised Info Edge on its $250m QIP, though that had happened before capital markets partner’s Jitesh Shahani’s exit.

L&L also saw Damini Bhalla, one of its homegrown corporate partners, join Zomato as its general counsel only in March 2021 (for many firms - such as Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas, very recently, with Byju and Roshan Thomas - such a move can be a clear signal that they might receive more work from the company in future).

Apparently not so in this case. We don’t know if L&L was in the running alongside JSA to work on the IPO, though its heavily and repeatedly decimated capital markets team means it is now unlikely that it would have pitched, despite L&L having several times vowed to make the practice better and more profitable than before.

For Indus, having been able to join the small club of capital markets firms that are instructed on mega IPOs, including getting the nod from the top-tier banks which have rather limited rosters of only top-tier advisers, was not a given, in light of Indus’ status as a relative newcomer, a bit of a legal mess after L&L Partners won (and lost) an injunction against the departing team, and despite the pedigree of the team joining.

At the time of the Lahoty-headed team of four other partners joining, we had reported that IndusLaw was betting on converting some of its corporate clients that it had babysat for many years into capital markets clients once some were ready for IPOs:

When asked about the challenges of winning capital markets work from typical clients in the space, such as bankers, that often prefer working with a very small roster of large firms, [co-founding partner Gaurav Dani] said it wouldn’t be a tough sell, adding that Indus also had “lots of large companies as clients and we have a very very strong private equity practice”.

That gambit seems to have now been vindicated.

Photo by FoeNyx

Comments

Capital Market 29 Apr 2021, 13:21
+15 -15
Why such hype for this IPO? Or you are paid for the publicity. For further details, please see "RF- 2 - We have incurred restated loss for the year/period of ₹1,069.16 million, ₹10,102.33 million, ₹23,856.01 million and
₹6,821.99 million in Fiscals 2018, 2019 and 2020, and in the nine months ended December 31, 2020, respectively. We
expect our costs to increase over time and our losses will continue given significant investments expected towards
growing our business." on page 37 of the DRHP.
Merchant banker 4 May 2021, 23:01
+3 -0
Still expected to raise 8,000 cr for vague (at best) objects of the issue

Given that sebi has caught on to the Ant problem and questioned being a professionally managed company

will be interesting to see what hogwash is pulled out this time around
L&L 29 Apr 2021, 13:40
+9 -12
This IPO has been cooking for months. In fact Damini's hire was because of the impending listing. Therefore, it's unfair to say that L&L couldn't score this mandate and JSA got it (despite Damini). So, please stop this forced sensationalism! L&L has massive issues currently but it will see this through and spring back soon!!
Guest 29 Apr 2021, 14:22
+15 -4
It’s just the beginning for Indus CM making it bigger than their L&L days. But what sort of sideways reporting is this LI? Targeting L&L and bigging Indus, what about the deal? What’s with the passing reference to CAM?

Maybe change to LegallyCosmo?
Guest 30 Apr 2021, 01:32
+14 -0
The para and subtle praise for CAM does seem out of place given the post theme clearly is Indus's victory of sorts.Let Indus have it's day,why let the big guns steal thunder.
Not big guns? 30 Apr 2021, 09:50
+3 -0
Memory fails those who say Indus CM isn’t part of the big guns. Wasn’t luthra CM the banks’ firm of choice? Or have we decided to forget the decades of practice and Band 1 positing of Indus at Chambers.

This is just bad reporting, doesn’t even serve the Indus team well to be honest.
It is a big deal 30 Apr 2021, 06:52
+10 -0
Breaking into the tight knit big bank club that are very guarded to move to other law firms than their regular ones,that's a big deal.Good one for Indus.
Merchant banker 4 May 2021, 23:03
+1 -0
Don’t ya know - Kian can’t sleep if he doesn’t find some way to praise cam every day
Go Indus! 29 Apr 2021, 14:22
+18 -2
Manan Lahoty, Abhiroop Lahiri, Abhyuday Bhotika, Priyadarshini Rao, Pooja Maloo, Ancha Venkata Samarth, Ritika Banerjee and Kamiya Marwah - full Indus team!
Hype 29 Apr 2021, 18:21
+4 -10
Anything Induslaw does is hyped. Thats why so much hype.
True story 30 Apr 2021, 04:39
Contested
+7 -10
That’s true. It’s the era of paid publicity
Unnicorn 30 Apr 2021, 07:09
+1 -1
Is this true Kian?
John Doe 30 Apr 2021, 02:19
+4 -2
I'm surprised that one deal can make or break a practice. If it were so simple...

It takes consistent earnings over a period of time to decide if a practice is successful or not. One deal here or there shouldn't matter.
Paid publishing? 30 Apr 2021, 05:23
+8 -9
So CAM got the mandate for the company, but headline and majority of the focus is on Indus!?!

And all this for just filing the DRHP.

Ohkay then!
Karteek 30 Apr 2021, 05:45
+4 -3
Paid publicity to encourage the CM team so that they do not leave.
symbiosis 30 Apr 2021, 06:33
+1 -0
Did Damini get Lahoty on the deal or did he get her this job???
tainu ki 30 Apr 2021, 07:24
+0 -1
bro both are deserving
Question 30 Apr 2021, 07:03
+5 -13
Success for CAM. Publicity for Banglur Laa Shop. How long will Zomato deliver?
Troll 30 Apr 2021, 11:53
+0 -2
I think they will delivery late into the night. Esp during COVID times.
Trool 30 Apr 2021, 13:29
+0 -1
wont deliver to you
Troll 3 2 May 2021, 17:40
+0 -0
Sorry. Delivery Boy.
OCD 1 May 2021, 10:02
+0 -2
What is LI's obsession with Capital Markets practice? Getting a mandate is new?
Not 3 May 2021, 08:59
+0 -4
Not obsessed with capital market - only obsessed with Indus law and its capital market practice. LI is not reporting the mandate, it is reporting only what Induslaw is doing. As someone else pointed, the actual mandate from the Company went to CAM - yet the headline is about Induslaw.
PR obsessed much? 3 May 2021, 10:36
+10 -1
Ya ya,all articles should only mention CAM.Doesnt matter if there are other law firms in the deal,there is no need to mention them.Deal details should only contain CAMs name,The other law firms need not be referred in article and most certainly not in headlines.New guidelines have been dictated to LI,enough?or you want LI to send a draft to CAM for approval before posting?