First NLS senior counsel interview: Akshay Bhan on the importance of seniors and who’s next from NLS

Akshay Bhan, who is the first NLSIU Bangalore alumnus and advocate designated as a senior counsel, as first reported by Legally India this morning, recounts how being a former Supreme Court judge’s son helps, the importance of seniors and how he thinks other NLS alumni are likely to be elevated soon too.

Bhan told Legally India that he started his practice in Punjab and Haryana high court after graduation and has now been practicing for around 15 years, doing general counsel practice across all fields, including tax, criminal, civil and writ work.

“Of course NLS has been the biggest factor on me to be reaching where I am,” he said. “One owes everything to your alma mater, which I do.”

“You have to love the profession and have to stick in – there will be ups and downs, play it and you win it and you lose it, but you just have to stick to something,” he said.

His father, Ashok Bhan, was a Supreme Court judge until 2008 and began his practice in the same court, he explained. “My father was designated senior in Punjab & Haryana high court before he got elevated here [to judgeship]. Then he was taken to Bangalore, where he was acting chief [justice] and got elevated to the Supreme Court, from where he retired.”

Ashok Bhan then headed up the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission and retired last year in October.

When asked whether having a father who was a former apex court judge helped politically in the senior designation process, Akshay Bhan said that it didn’t. “Politically we are way apart – my father actually retired from active judicial service 5.5 years back, so I can’t even [benefit from that],” he joked, and added: “Yes, in the initial stage of my career the old clients [of my father] that used to come in and all, it did help because my father had a huge office when he was elevated.”

But he added: “The biggest step [in my career] was in 2004 when my senior [Ajay Mittal] was elevated [to judgeship in the P&H high court where he still sits], I got his whole office, which turned out to be a very big [help].

“Your visibility quotient goes up and you get a tremendous amount of exposure.”

Bhan noted that working with someone as a senior can have a huge impact.

When asked whether it was easier to get elevated in the P&H high court, Bhan said that he wouldn’t necessarily agree. “Even Delhi HC has a few NLS alumni who I think should be on the verge of being designated - primary amongst them, being Mr Dayan Krishnan [who graduated in 1993 from NLSIU’s first batch.”

“And if you go down to Bangalore, my batchmate Aditya Sondhi, he’s doing amazingly well there, and there are many, many more,” he said, and also mentioned Siddharth Aggarwal in Delhi.

Bhan is the first national law school graduate to be designated senior at any court in India. Research by Legally India last year revealed that 26 per cent of recent partners at India’s six largest firms hailed from NLS, ahead of Delhi University, which constituted the second-largest contingent at 17 per cent.

Readers: Please leave your nominations in the comments below for who should soon be senior counsel from NLSIU, or from other national or younger law schools.

Comments

Future Rockstars 31 Jan 2014, 08:44
+37 -12
Siddharth Aggarwal and Rajshekar Rao
kianganz 31 Jan 2014, 08:48
+7 -5
Please also mention which high court they're practising, and the batch or any other relevant details, if applicable. And please vote up the ones you agree with.
Up and away 31 Jan 2014, 14:58
+7 -6
Both Raj and Siddharth are in the Delhi High Court and Supreme Court
Done. 26 Mar 2021, 09:35
+1 -0
7 years, though.
Scooty 31 Jan 2014, 08:55
+7 -6
Kian, Justice Bhan was elevated to the Supreme Court in 2001 and he retired in 2008. Your article says that he retired in 1998.
kianganz 31 Jan 2014, 08:58
+7 -2
Yes, sorry, don't know how that happened...
devilsadvocate 31 Jan 2014, 09:19
+29 -2
Did he start practice at P&H HC when his father was a sitting judge there? Just curious. In any case, it does not hurt to inherit 2 chambers and have one's father as a SC judge.
rotten 3 Feb 2014, 08:33
+8 -1
[b]Nepotism in judiciary[/b]
"Relatives of around 18 advocates in the Punjab and Haryana high court who are kith and kin of judges of Punjab and Haryana high court and are at present posted as law officers in the AG offices of the state of Punjab and Haryana."

http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-09-08/india/41873359_1_haryana-ag-punjab-and-haryana-law-officers
Guest 31 Jan 2014, 09:46
+12 -22
My nomination: Sajan Poovayya, former Additional Advocate General of Karnataka
SR 31 Jan 2014, 10:01
+3 -3
Another DYC story...
Blore Rocks 31 Jan 2014, 10:02
+7 -9
Srinivasa Raghavan, Bangalore
Arun 7 Feb 2014, 13:29
+0 -1
Without a doubt!! :)
pp 31 Jan 2014, 10:29
+18 -39
gopal shankarnarayan, Delhi & SC
Have Mercy 3 Feb 2014, 21:26
+7 -1
Kian, this is not cool. While you asked people to vote up, you knew very well that people would vote down too and that would create controversy (and add to more visits to LI).

PP's suggestion of Gopal Sankarnarayan has been downvoted to such an extent that it appears as "Controversial" and says "Comment hidden because downvoted..."

Can you imagine how these people must be feeling? If I wanted a popularity contest, I'd organize it. No need to do the honours.
Guest 13 May 2018, 16:59
+1 -0
Gopal is probably the number 1 lawyer in the SC in his category. In the words of his peers there is no one like him.
BV 31 Jan 2014, 11:28
+16 -9
Vaibhav Ganjiwale and Abhishek Chopra in Supreme Court of India.
Future Jurists 31 Jan 2014, 13:49
+9 -9
[quote name="BV"]Vaibhav Ganjiwale and Abhishek Chopra in Supreme Court of India.[/quote]
I agree. Should also add Roshan Santhalia. All three are of equal calibre.
haanji 4 Feb 2014, 14:52
+6 -1
ganjiwale? seriously? he graduated in 2011 idiot
LoL 4 Feb 2014, 16:04
+5 -0
2011 kiddo. LOL. I guess they have run out names of those NLS alumni in litigation. They are are now scraping the bottom of the barrel. "Did you graduate from NLS and know what a court looks like? Great. You deserve to be designated senior counsel."
Guest 7 Feb 2014, 10:32
+2 -0
Vaibhav Ganjiwale is not from NLS
Ganjiwale Fan 5 Feb 2014, 17:45
+4 -0
In anycase I feel he is doing a great job in what he is doing now !
Another Ganjiwale Fan 6 Feb 2014, 16:24
+5 -0
Vaibhav Ganjiwale will not only be a Senior Counsel but also Attorney General. Watch it!!
Okay, but 6 Feb 2014, 16:52
+24 -0
let him be a general attorney first.
Ought to 31 Jan 2014, 11:56
+11 -3
Anita Shenoy (Supreme Court);
Rajshekhar Rao (Supreme Court);
Gaurav Agarwal (Supreme Court);
Uttam Maheshwari (Madhya Pradesh High Court)
Rahul Agarwal (Allahabad High Court)
Another Alum 31 Jan 2014, 13:57
+7 -1
Most of these people are very good, but far too young (in the 10-15 years experience range).

Akshay's pulled it off at an incredibly young age - I don't think he's even 40 yet, with 15 years at the Bar.

Dayan and Sajjan are around the right age and probably the leading candidates now.
Guest 31 Jan 2014, 14:21
+7 -2
Dayan Krishnan, Sai Krishna, Siddarth Agarwal, Gaurav Agrawal (all of them Supreme Court)
Guest 31 Jan 2014, 14:27
+7 -10
Bipul Kundalia at Calcutta High Court
SA 31 Jan 2014, 14:40
+14 -6
Menaka Guruswamy, Supreme Court.
tasteless 31 Jan 2014, 16:20
+18 -2
This is so tasteless. Getting people to name potential senior counsels and then have them voted up or down. Seriously Kian. ..This is incredibly tasteless and just shows how much you like people to start batching and fighting..think of the named people's feelings? Dickish behaviour.
kianganz 31 Jan 2014, 16:22
+3 -12
Didn't ask for voting down, just up, and I think all names published here obviously need to be taken with a big pinch of salt, but it's an interesting list that's coming together for people who don't spend all days in the courts...
tasteless 1 Feb 2014, 09:25
+10 -1
If I recall your first message did have something about voting up..which appears to have been changed. In any event...This is tasteless..I am a litigator and this is absolutely disgusting.revolting.
kianganz 3 Feb 2014, 04:18
+2 -7
My first message still has something about voting up but not about voting down, I am not sure what you are reading.

Sure, some people will clearly troll on this thread but I don't think it's been too bad. If a suggestion is completely inappropriate (eg someone who's practised for only 2 years or something, please leave a comment or report it and we will remove it).

And if you find it so revolting, please don't read the comments - they are hidden behind a big health warning for the more sensitive among us...

Best wishes
Kian
Naive 3 Feb 2014, 07:40
+3 -1
Perhaps you have a point, but if you think about it, all of these people are hardened litigators and before they make the jump to seniors, many more influential people will say very harsh things about them. A confidence/no confidence motion from the randoms on LI really can't be a big deal, eh?

But what do I know.
kianganz 3 Feb 2014, 08:32
+1 -2
@Naive said what I'd intended to say but found the right words that I failed to find... Thanks!
djsf 4 Feb 2014, 06:53
+4 -2
Cause your words were clearly rude.. "if you dont like - dont read it"...we may just stop reading your site. Look at whats happened on the Gopal Sankarnarayan comment. its down voted to "Controversial" and is hidden. I appreciate your work Kian, but you need to stop this "i am an admirer of free speech" and actually be honest about your real intentions - comments get you more readership..and controversial ones, even more. just be honest and say that. Even the Hindu regulates comments btw.
kianganz 4 Feb 2014, 09:01
+1 -4
We also regulate comments, much more than you think and probably more than our competitors too, judging by the nastiness I've read elsewhere too.

However, I think this one is an interesting thread and it brings a bit of transparency and debate about who's up and coming in the courts.

I think anyone smart and senior enough to be in that league won't start welling up over a couple of anonymous downvotes. And I believe one person mentioned here, who'd written a controversial article on another website, faced far worse in the comments there than they ever have here.

I think everyone knows, or at least should know, that law school, even after graduation, and court politics are undoubtedly a huge factor in 'downvotes' and opposition, as both can be incredibly back-stabbing and cliquey worlds.

If a tiny bit of that nastiness is reflected in some up- or downvotes, so be it, I'm pretty sure no one will get unduly hurt by it.

I'm also pretty sure there are far bigger fish to fry at the bar than a few comments under a blog.

Finally, let me reiterate, that we also really do mean the big red health-warning you need to click before reading the comments: if you don't like the comments or are a sensitive soul, please don't read or participate in them.

I'd like to think that most of the articles we publish are interesting enough.

Best wishes,
Kian
Concerned 4 Feb 2014, 07:00
+2 -0
And if others saying harsh things is the yardstick.. why regulate at all? LEt people use abusive language also? SAy personal malicious wrong things as well!? Where do you draw the line then? Litigators should have thick skin and hence wouldnt mind being named and voted up and down is an absurd argument! Same stretch should apply to law firm partners. Lets start voting them also up and down then? Why double standards? Who should be the next partner in big law firms - dare you to open that one Kian?

Rubbish your comments section has become. Alas - thats what gets you more hits so you encourage the rubbish. I normally would never use strong language, but LI just doesnt seem to get the message about the harm its comments section does.
Huh 4 Feb 2014, 11:06
+2 -0
[quote name="tasteless"]This is so tasteless. . . . .[/quote]
If it is tasteless, take it with a pinch of salt.
Angrezi? 31 Jan 2014, 16:50
+8 -1
"Of course NLS has been the biggest factor on me to be reaching where I am”

ON me? Kian, you sure he said this?

AND “ONE owes everything to YOUR alma mater, which I do”?

Please get the quotes right.
kianganz 1 Feb 2014, 05:47
+4 -0
People rarely speak colloquially in the same way that people write formally. Quotes are accurate...
Polly? 1 Feb 2014, 01:13
+2 -9
Palash Ranjan Gupta ? He is just become a PARTNER at Haresh Jagtiani & Associates - a hard core Bombay lit firm!
Anon 1 Feb 2014, 11:27
+3 -4
Kian, why don't u cover this ?
[quote name="Polly?"]Palash Ranjan Gupta ? He is just become a PARTNER at Haresh Jagtiani & Associates - a hard core Bombay lit firm![/quote]
Lawschoolite 1 Feb 2014, 05:01
+37 -2
2 AAGs and 1 Senior Counsel- One a Congress spokesperson, another a BJP lobbyist and the third a Judge's son. Amazing! So even NLSites need the X factor- merit alone does not matter. Lol! The two AAGs hardly came to Court and when they did, they mostly hid behind a senior counsel's gown. And what has Akshay done that is SO outstanding that he should be honoured with a gown at such a young age when people like Dayan are still fighting in the trenches?! I am ashamed to be a lawschoolite - we are just like the rest - not above politics.
Guest 1 Feb 2014, 05:35
+2 -3
"two AAGs hardly came to court"?

Not true about the AAG I saw. i.e. Mr. Sajan Poovayya at the Karnataka High Court. Definitely appeared and took the lead in most matters before the Karnataka High Court. Not a single matter where he "hid behind a senior counsel's gown". As to being a BJP lobbyist, I have no comment.
A 1 Feb 2014, 15:54
+7 -2
I agree with Lawschoolite completely. Sajjan rarely did appear in court to argue matters, though he did race between courts with a 8 person troupe led by the mace bearer {dressed like a band major for some weird reason} giving assurances that things would be done/info provided. Aditya Sondhi is a remarkable counsel and is rightly considered the second best (senior counsel included) in Karnataka.

A 7 month AAG stint and NLS credentials simply don't make a person deserving of 'silk'.
B 1 Feb 2014, 19:49
+3 -2
Who is the best counsel? Udaya Holla??
D 3 Feb 2014, 11:22
+0 -2
Who says he's the "second best"? Just your opinion. He's still got years to reach there.
A 3 Feb 2014, 18:31
+1 -0
Possibly. But he's also years ahead of the former AAG and many current senior counsel].
Guest 7 Feb 2014, 10:34
+1 -0
This comment seems to have no basis in fact. No mace bearers, dressed as band majors or otherwise, accompany AAGs/AGs. Not in the Karnataka HC.
Anonymous 1 Feb 2014, 05:42
+21 -3
Dayan is a gentleman, beyond reproach. I would think that he would make a fine High Court and Supreme Court judge. The Gown, in his case, should probably just be a formality to satisfy that condition precedent to elevate him.
RS 1 Feb 2014, 14:49
+0 -0
Other than Sajan, who is the other AAG?
Lawschoolite 2 Feb 2014, 06:20
+0 -2
Brijesh Kalappa, AAG Haryana
DBS 3 Feb 2014, 06:20
+1 -0
[quote name="Lawschoolite"]merit alone does not matter.[/quote]
In Litigation, the company you keep also matters! Its all about marketing oneself. Once you know the right kind of people you will get work even if some others are more competent than you. Luck also plays a part!
Guest 1 Feb 2014, 14:44
+2 -1
Mr Bibhu Prasad Tripathy who is a post graduate from National Law School Bangalore and practicing in Orissa High Court should be senior counsel.He is practicing for more than 15 years in Orissa High court being the standing counsel of state Govt
J.K. 2 Feb 2014, 04:24
+0 -7
Anup S
CA 2 Feb 2014, 20:22
+6 -0
LOL
Gulti 2 Feb 2014, 12:00
+1 -3
Vivek Reddy in Andhra Pradesh High Court.. It is a given.. the only question is when?
Gulti 2 2 Feb 2014, 15:41
+5 -0
[quote name="Gulti"]Vivek Reddy in Andhra Pradesh High Court.. It is a given.. the only question is when?[/quote]

Agreed, its a "given"...since his dad is a senior counsel.
know facts 27 Aug 2016, 17:50
+0 -0
his dad is an advocate general, now...vivek is around 35...way to go, may be 10 years more. i see him in the court, daily. He is good, and will become a senior counsel.
Another lawschoolite 2 Feb 2014, 16:16
+6 -0
You don't get elevated to senior, only elevated to a Judge. Slightly better reporting expected.
Guest 3 Feb 2014, 05:18
+6 -0
Kian, you could do an article comparing how the older law schools (DU, GLC, ILS) are faring when it comes to senior counsel designations. And I'm not talking about pre-NLS times. If you cover senior counsel designations post 1993 across law schools, it would provide a better perspective whether the NLS factor really has a role to play.
Proud of litigators 3 Feb 2014, 06:51
+12 -0
Congratulations Akshay Bhan. He was a role model in NLS. He was the head of the SDGM (responsible for student discipline) and was very fair. Had no airs about being a judge's son. Was polite and immaculate in his behavior with juniors, seniors and teachers. Great to see he has been able to use his good qualities to become a good lawyer. Being designated a Senior Counsel is seriously good stuff. Raj, Siddharth, Gaurav Agarwal, Vivek Reddy and many more to come. Proud of all of the NLS folk who have taken up litigation(I am not a litigator). May you inspire the next generation.
del counsel 3 Feb 2014, 10:43
+0 -0
A. It is strange that Senior Counsel designation is being discussed in such a manner in a public forum, dunno how many actually know the qualifications required thereof.

B. The names - everyone named herein has obviously reached sopme strata to be mentioned herein.

C. Dayan Krishnan - Despite being a really good counsel, his see-sawing of stands, in the 2G cases has certainly hampered all the good work that he has done, with some orders even noting the continuous contradictory stands being taken by him before different tribunals and courts.

D. Deserving or not - nepotism or not - NLS or not - the fact that people are getting designated at such young age definitely highlights that if you have the 'necessary' qualifications, there is a hope ( a slim one albeit) but there is that you will get that gown.
tuu 3 Feb 2014, 11:12
+1 -1
Sidharth Dave, SC
Rockstar 3 Feb 2014, 17:55
+12 -3
ADITYA SONDHi - hands down. Karnataka High Court.
Anon 4 Feb 2014, 05:32
+2 -3
Jayant Mehta (AOR, Supreme Court)
Guest 4 Feb 2014, 09:13
+7 -0
"“Politically we are way apart – my father actually retired from active judicial service 5.5 years back, so I can’t even [benefit from that],” he joked"

Yeah, right. So daddy was a judge for the first 10 years of junior's career which are the most critical.

This 'joke' is a weak attempt to defuse what is otherwise a glaring instance of nepotism. FOUR-FIVE batches of NLS, each with 60-70 lawyers many of whom are equity partners, general counsels, etc. but apparently NONE are qualified enough to be senior counsel until young Mr Bhan with his impeccable pedigree and many chambers comes along.

It is a disrespect to every honest hardworking lawyer out there each time somebody's kiddy is given a toy as a reward. Disgusting, and Kian I hope you will publish this since it reflects the views of many of your readers who are not from so privileged backgrounds, many of whom tried for years to litigate but gave up because having no connections proved to be too hard.
kianganz 4 Feb 2014, 09:40
+7 -1
To be fair, I think Mr Bhan was pretty candid about having had the good fortune of inheriting clients from his father and a practice from his senior.

And if you look at most of the senior counsel (or law firm equity partners), how many do you think had parents in the profession? More than 50%?

I think it's a given in the profession, particularly at the bar, that connections, whether from law school, family or elsewhere, go a long, long way.

Also, children of lawyers or judges don't ask to be children of lawyers or judges. If their family or background benefits their careers, as it inevitably does, should their entire life's work or any achievements be discounted because of that?

Finally, is it inconceivable that someone is related to a judge but could also be a fantastic lawyer in their own right?
Anon 4 Feb 2014, 11:05
+3 -1
As a NLS grad I am very happy that Akshay Bhan has been designated, it is definitely a proud moment for NLS regardless of his pedigree. And of course he has to perform on his own merit to keep succeeding, his father cannot help him with that. But Kian, the point being made is that the profession is far too skewed towards those with such a background, they get the opportunities which others do not get. Being hard working and meritorious is simply not enough to do well in litigation unless you have the background connections to go with it. And there are numerous examples of this. If some people express their disillusionment it is not surprising because it is very frustrating to see others racing ahead only because of who they are.
kianganz 4 Feb 2014, 11:09
+4 -0
Agreed, the problem is clearly endemic in the profession (and in Indian culture/society, to an extent).

Therefore there is no quick fix, and picking on one person such as Mr Bhan does not really seem fair.

Agree the bigger issue is worth raising though.
Frankly Speaking 4 Feb 2014, 12:03
+2 -0
[i]"Also, children of lawyers or judges don't ask to be children of lawyers or judges. If their family or background benefits their careers, as it inevitably does, should their entire life's work or any achievements be discounted because of that?"[/i]

That is EXACTLY the argument that RaGa gave ArGo's Nation in the course of a recent spectacular TV interview ;-)
Guest 4 Feb 2014, 20:24
+11 -0
[quote name="kianganz"]To be fair, I think Mr Bhan was pretty candid about having had the good fortune of inheriting clients from his father and a practice from his senior.

And if you look at most of the senior counsel (or law firm equity partners), how many do you think had parents in the profession? More than 50%?

I think it's a given in the profession, particularly at the bar, that connections, whether from law school, family or elsewhere, go a long, long way.

Also, children of lawyers or judges don't ask to be children of lawyers or judges. If their family or background benefits their careers, as it inevitably does, should their entire life's work or any achievements be discounted because of that?

Finally, is it inconceivable that someone is related to a judge but could also be a fantastic lawyer in their own right?[/quote]

Kian,

Young Mr Bhan has no choice but to be candid. The facts are all out there (when he started practice, when daddy was elevated, how long daddy was in the apex court, etc.) so he is doing nobody a favour by being 'candid'. Rather it is a weak-wristed attempted to defend a question which could create embarassment.

In mostly all other career options, such as law firm tracks or GC tracks, a few do get to the top because of family connections (take Pramod Rao of ICICI who is related to Mr KV Kamath thru his wife or Justin Bharucha of Bharucha Partners / Ravindra Jhunjhunwala of Khaitan). But for the most part, the vast majority of the success stories do not have a daddy/mommy/uncle connection. The earliest partners from NLSIU like Umakanth / Vineetha MG had no such connections in AMSS / AZB.

In Akshay Bhan's case he is being designated senior at an age of maybe 38/39 when many high courts have unofficial policies preventing people below 40/45 from being designated senior. My point is that is he such a spectacular lawyer so as to (1) deserve senior counsel at 38 and (2) be appointed before ANYONE else from his alma mater 4-5 years his senior is designated so? Do anyone honestly believe the story would have been different if Akshay went to Punjab University and not NLSIU ?

You have missed an excellent chance to highlight the flaws in our system and made a hero out of a recipient of what is without a doubt a nepotistic appointment. Your priorities amaze me.
scammentator 4 Feb 2014, 09:28
+2 -0
Suraj govindraj
courtbird 4 Feb 2014, 11:50
+2 -0
I think Mr Balaji Subramaniam deserves it. I think he is the best of the new crop of upcoming advocates practising on the civil criminal and writ side. I hope he gets recognised soon.
DBS 5 Feb 2014, 05:48
+0 -0
Who is the youngest to be designated as Senior Counsel??
A.M. Singhvi or was it Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud?
IP 5 Feb 2014, 08:54
+4 -3
Shwetasree Majumder', Delhi High Court for her IP work.
VOTE FOR VIKRAM RAGHAVAN 6 Feb 2014, 06:45
+1 -1
i would nominate vikram raghavan - he had all teh potentail to be the finest senior counsel but chose to sit behind a desk in DC. but his contribution to constitutional law is still incredible.
Anon 6 Feb 2014, 07:13
+9 -0
after reading all these suggested names with great interest I cannot help but wonder if some people are putting up their own names here?
Guest 7 Feb 2014, 10:43
+0 -0
I must admit that I put up the name of the lawyer in whose chambers I am a junior. Of course, I also truly believe he/she is really worthy of silk.
Little Birdie 6 Feb 2014, 12:14
+4 -0
A Little Birdie has just informed me that the Next Senior from NLS, bangalore has been Designated..Hint its from the Delhi High Court
Wondering? 16 Apr 2014, 15:08
+0 -1
How about Abhinav Chandrachaud, he seems to be doing well and has the required connections
Harry 9 Sept 2015, 03:51
+2 -0
I have a suggestion to Mr senior advocate. My owns going through lot of troubles. Mr senior advocate claimed and insured about the case that possibly liable to come through. Simply, bumped out in a very few innings. Sir, winning is possible if the focus is on the game that practice normally other than something not known. Demanding large amounts but zero outcomes is a syndicating but not valuing the study earned.

Opening (but not repairing) many machines simultaneously is not a "ingenuity", its a complexity.

No client has a right to buy player, accordingly no player has a right to "sold" their client.
Adv Satish 27 Aug 2016, 08:03
+1 -0
Today I got the privilege to hear him. A eloquent orator and a vigorous speaker who can prove his point through audacity.