Application for Indian lawyers to practice in UK not yet received by SRA; Top priority at BCI

london-big-ben_by_David-Sifry
london-big-ben_by_David-Sifry
The Solicitors Regulations Authority (SRA) has not yet received the completed survey for India to be included in the England & Wales Qualified Lawyers Transfer Scheme (QLTS) but the Bar Council of India (BCI) assured it was an “urgent matter” and would be completed “as soon as possible”.

An SRA spokesperson said that the situation remained unchanged since Legally India first reported on 2 September that Indian lawyers would not be able to apply to practice law in England because India was not included in the list of jurisdictions under the new QLTS regime, due to an apparent clerical oversight at the BCI.

“We haven’t heard anything but are keen to hear from them and will deal with their response expeditiously when they respond,” said the SRA spokesperson.

Professor of law and the BCI’s associate director of legal education Rahul Singh said that the BCI remained committed to getting India included in the list. “We have taken a serious note of it and it is something which should have been done earlier.”

“We are trying to get it done as soon as possible and one of our colleagues is on it,” explained Singh, adding that the paperwork had only filtered through to the directorate of legal education several days ago. “It is an urgent matter for us as well.”

The new QLTS exam, which came into effect on 1 September to replace the Qualified Lawyers Transfer Test (QLTT) is required for Indian and other non-English lawyers to practice law in England & Wales.

Jurisdictions such as Canada and New York were also omitted from the original list, although as per the latest update of 7 September lawyers qualified under the New York state bar are now also eligible to take the QLTS.

Photo by David Sifry

Comments

Anonymous guest 24 Sept 2010, 21:04
+0 -0
well our very own BCI is extremely busy [...] with Rainmaker by torchering freshers to give bar exams. How can you expect them to do this useless work. How abt SILF helping BCI out with this.
Anonymous guest 24 Sept 2010, 21:24
+0 -0
That is a defamatory statement. Please know that defamation suits are going to filed for such comments in the future by lawyers like me. Please do not write here unless you are certain.
Anonymous guest 24 Sept 2010, 22:28
+0 -0
what does "torchering" mean? hahaha..i can imagine BCI holding a torch on students...improve your english at least....
Anonymous guest 24 Sept 2010, 22:47
+0 -0
@ 2 - defamation will take place only when its a false statement. What # 1 is saying is absolutely true. The proposal of a bar exam should be announced atleast 3-5 yrs before passing out.If you want to raise the standard of the bar then ask existing date seeking advocates and corrupt judges to clear two bar exams - one based on ethics and the other for legal aptitude. Perhaps rainmaker will help then also. LOL !!
Anonymous guest 24 Sept 2010, 23:55
+0 -0
#1 is obviously a SILF supporter. His/her poor English proves that SILF people are [...]