Budget catches senior advocates & tribunals with wider service tax net

The Union Budget has withdrawn the service tax exemption of senior advocates providing services to other advocates or law firms, effectively increasing the cost of instructing senior counsel by 14 per cent.

The Union Budget has proposed withdrawing the service tax exemption of senior advocates providing services to other advocates or law firms, effectively increasing the cost of instructing senior counsel by 14 per cent.

Service tax is also now chargeable on representations before arbitral tribunals, but legal services provided by “firm of advocates” - presumably meaning litigating lawyers as opposed to transactional lawyers - and individual advocates are still exempt from service tax.

Seniors already charge what some would call exorbitant fees - as Legally India research had revealed in Mint last year, senior counsel in Delhi easily charge more than Rs 15 lakh per appearance to clients.

With an additional service tax rate of 14 per cent, this could work out to more than Rs 17 lakh per appearance, or a Rs 2 lakh increase.

The legal services tax saga now has history.

In 2009 the Union Budget introduced service tax for all lawyers, many of whom were unhappy.

In 2012, the Union Budget exempted litigation and tribunal work from service tax after strikes and protests by advocates and stays by high courts, causing considerable confusion in the process.

The new distinction between senior advocates and advocates appears arbitrary for the purposes of taxation, although perhaps it’s a misguided attempt to encourage the practice of non-senior advocates, whose services are already many times cheaper than those of seniors.

On the other hand, this will put the services of senior advocates - who can be quite effective according to earlier published research - even further beyond the reach of anyone but the richest clients.

The new provision on page 9 of the finance ministry’s Department of Revenue changes in service tax rules, as first tweeted by @poeticgooner (download PDF here) states:

6.0 Review of Exemptions:

6.1 Exemption in respect of the following services is being withdrawn,-

- Services provided by a senior advocate to an advocate or partnership firmof advocates, and

- A person represented on an arbitral tribunal to an arbitral tribunal;

Service tax in the above instances would be levied under forward charge.

However, the existing dispensation regarding legal services provided by afirm of advocates or an advocate other than senior advocate is beingcontinued.

Hat-tip @sowmyarao_ and @poeticgooner

Comments

Rabbi 29 Feb 2016, 13:02
+3 -0
I really dont think this will have a material impact. In most cases, while the firms instruct the senior advocates, the payments are made directly by the client. The client will anyway be discharging service tax. So this literally doesnt increase the cost of engaging a senior advocate in such situations. The issue will arise only if the client pays the law firm who in turn will have to pay the senior advocate, which is negligible in the scheme of things.
Anony 1 Mar 2016, 12:20
+0 -0
Rabbi is absolutely correct! ST is paid on legal services under the reverse charge mechanism. This has merely been brought under forward charge ie., service provider will pay instead of service recipient.
Lp56 29 Feb 2016, 13:11
+1 -0
your story on how much fees Bombay Senior Counsels charge is still pending.
AG 17 Mar 2016, 05:37
+0 -0
Considering that this article features on "legallyindia", i must say it has been written with a surprising lack of understanding of the service tax law. even earlier, the services of advocates were subject to service tax. the exemption provided was only for non-business entities or entities with turnover of upto 10 lac pa., who anyways might not have been able to afford senior counsels charging high sums. the amendments made by the budget have merely removed it from reverse charge and placed the onus on the senior advocates. while they may find it more cumbersome, this would in no way make their services more expensive.