CCI takes pity on Thomas Cook, Sterling Holiday Resorts; penalises with Rs 1 crore

The Competition Commission of India (CCI) fined British travel major Thomas Cook and Sterling Holiday Resorts a “nominal” Rs 1 crore, for failing to notify the CCI before Thomas Cook acquired shares in Sterling.

The CCI stated in its 21 May order, which was published on the CCI’s website today:

“In the instant case, the Parties consummated the Market Purchases between 10th and 12th February 2014 and same was disclosed in the notice filed on 14th February 2014. Though the parties have made full disclosure of all the transactions and there was no effort on their part to conceal information, the Commission discovered the violation of the provisions of the Act only from the notice given by the Parties. These facts go to suggest that the conduct of the Parties was not such that attracts severe penalty. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the Commission considers it appropriate to impose a relatively nominal penalty on the Parties.”

The CCI has approved the Rs 870 crore merger of Sterling with Thomas Cook in March, as reported by Money Control. The Commission dealt with parts of the merger as a “composite combination” and observed that composite notices were needed to be filed with it. The parties argued that the CCI’s combination regulations did not regulate “composite combinations” and “even assuming for the sake of argument” if they did, the particular acquisition of shares was not a composite combination.

Legally India could not confirm the advisors to Thomas Cook and Sterling Holiday Resorts at the time of going to press, though AZB & Partners as well as Trilegal have advised Thomas Cook on corporate work in the past.

In the same week as this order, the commission had also fined Trilegal’s client – Anglo-global supermarket retail behemoth Tesco – Rs 3 crore for delay in filing notice seeking the CCI’s approval for its joint venture (JV) with Trent, as reported by Legally India.

Comments

Guest 25 Jun 2014, 10:54
+1 -0
"The Commission discovered the violation of the provisions of the Act only from the notice given by the Parties." should this really be in their order! Ridiculous. What were they doing instead?
Guest 25 Jun 2014, 12:57
+3 -2
In the absence of Prof. Rahul Singh, Tri clients seem to be having lots of fun with CCI here! :P
AZB 26 Jun 2014, 04:42
+5 -1
Samir Gandhi AZb competition head advised Thomas Cook who is the acquirer. JSA advised the target. Convenient to unnecessarily implicate Trilegal when AZB is common between this fine and Tesco where it advised Trent. Time for AZB and Trilegal to get senior competition lawyers in each office city location.
Guest 26 Jun 2014, 05:32
+2 -0
JSA did not advise any party in this transaction.
PE GC 29 Jun 2014, 19:08
+1 -1
I have read the order. Abysmal quality of advice if AZB could not tell their clients not to acquire shares till the approval came through. Shows lack of knowledge and non-application of mind. Clients do not pay top dollar for this! Shoddy work by the competition lawyers at AZB!!!
Hilarious 26 Jun 2014, 14:10
+4 -0
The only parties the CCI fines for belated filings and gun jumping are those who filed voluntarily. Not seen any where CCI has discovered parties not complying and caught them. Also why is AZB getting associated with all the fines. Time to take more conservative views or file earlier.