DIPP public consultation on FDI in LLPs; Appropriate also for law firms?

The department of industrial policy and promotion (DIPP) has invited discussions on whether foreign direct investments should be allowed into professional services firms including law firms incorporated as limited liability partnerships (LLPs).

The discussion paper, which is available on the DIPP’s website, has invited comments by 30 October on the issues with FDI into LLP firms, which could become more popular as a vehicle for private equity funds and other companies.

“The LLP model is attractive to professional sectors for its lower compliance costs, greater flexibility in operations, better control over management and limited liability. Many professionals in India, such as advocates/lawyers, chartered accountants and doctors are precluded from practicing through companies. The LLP structure would be particularly advantageous for providing such professional services,” stated the paper.

The issues the DIPP wishes to examine include whether FDI should be permitted in LLPs at all: “Can it be argued that given its limited attractiveness for large investments, allowing FDI in LLPs will not significantly accelerate FDI into the country while disproportionately increasing the regulatory burden? Does the present uncertainty on how this business model will proceed, as well its yet unestablished case law, magnify these concerns?”

Other concerns include whether FDI in LLPs should be phased in with sector restrictions with or without caps, conditionalities or entry route restrictions and whether an Indian partner is required.

In March of this year the Economic Times reported that the Commerce and Industry Ministry was opposed to automatic route FDI in LLPs on security grounds, as the DIPP was discussing the issue with the finance and corporate affairs ministries.

Two law firms have already converted to LLP and at least eight have registered their LLP trading names or are discussing the conversion internally, Legally India reported in August.

Non-Indian citizens are currently not permitted to practise law in India or be partners in Indian law firms.

Download the discussion paper on FDI in LLPs.

Comments

Anonymous guest 8 Oct 2010, 23:25
+0 -0
Thi is an interesting bit of news. However, this is an initiative of the Finance and Commerce Ministries. The Law Min's priorities are different and Moily could scuttle any attempt at reforming the legal sector. A comparison between Pranab Mukherjee and Moily's track records makes this clear. The FM has been pro-reform and has been one of the best-performing ministers while Moily has been amongst the worst performers because he has not carried out a single piece of reform.
Anonymous guest 10 Oct 2010, 23:06
+0 -0
reacting to the statement "Non-Indian citizens are currently not permitted to practice law in India" - is this true? if so, this is really archaic... i would presume that if a non-Indian citizen completed a law degree from India, he/she would be eligible to practice law in India... having a citizenship requirement does not make sense, i.e. what is the risk/ concern that is being protected against by imposing a citizenship requirement for practice of law (I can understand in other areas of national importance, but not here), if it is indeed so the case.. would appreciate any comments/ inputs/ direction to what is the correct position and anyone who knows or has any justification for why it should be that way.. thanks
P.S. - if this is true, it is also ridiculous in light of the fact that an Indian citizen can study law in U.K. and practice law in India, but someone who studies law in India cannot practice law in India (because he/she is not an Indian citizen) - how would the law schools ever attract foreign students, as in what incentive is there to study in India, if you cannot qualify into the bar.