We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Is bullying people necessary? Can't you just keep quiet if you have got nothing helpful to contribute in the thread?
The stream you choose in your +2 should depend entirely on what interests you period! Otherwise the bheed that is in science won't decrease but will actually keep on increasing. Harming not just the people who actually are interested in science by fucking their mental health and chances but also those who select science just because of money. More students becoming directionless, getting fucked again and again by the entrances for the subjects they don't even care about a bit. And finally losing motivation after facing failure for the nth time.
Not every thing should be chosen according to money prospects. Happiness matters! A career will be something that you will have for your whole life. Why would anyone want to be depressed their whole life?
75% of your batch is from science because not everyone succeeds in those entrances. 99% of people in science do not end up with good colleges after their 12th, decide to take a drop and then repeat that cycle. Everyone knows this! And law being a good second option, people shift their careers. They have been doing that for a long time now and still are doing it.
Giving 3-4 chances to these entrances means giving 4 years of your life to just get a college. That is not a joke! You might have graduated recently but you don't the current situation. How burned out we get after our 12th! Drop is not a joke.
Honestly to me, you seem bitter just because your sci friends are earning more than you. 17LPA is not less. It is more than what most of the population in India earns. 17LPA might seem measly to you, but in reality it is not!
You seriously have boomer mentality. Never expected to hear this from someone of the same generation.
She has described the mundane nature of Law jobs across the board, compared to consulting, engineering and the likes. Also, let's be honest, law firms are the only avenue to make any kind of liveable money. I would've liked if you mentioned examples of careers which pay even decent sums, so the young minds may consider.
Not only have you made a biased presumption, due to your lack of comprehension and experience, you haven't even made attempts to read through properly. The OP clearly mentions that PCM opens more gates. You CANNOT by regulation, even attempt engineering or medical, or any related fields without a PCMB background. A class 12 humanities student only has very few courses to pursue that would enabl3 them to pay bills for life.
It is not a huge ask, for a career to pay you decently. It's a basic human right, a human need. In 2024, you cannot pursue a course on gender rights and then also cover for your basic needs.
Litigation pays nothing. Nor does policy. Do tell us what else you know. A further educational investment is required for an academic career, which may also not be viable for everyone.
While I agree the fact that a career is interesting or mundane, is to themselves and their opinion, there is such a thing called objective boredom inducement. And that is corporate law. There is not one person who would do it for litigation money. Not one sane person who's dad isn't an amarchand or khaitan.
While there are upvotes on your comment, they are just random people not reading your flawed statements vis a vis the OP but just amused with the devils advocacy you have so disrespectfully attempted. Rather than making allegations, it would serve you good to suggest these avenues you boast of after you also clear your own credentials?
Clat asks basic level CR and Legal reasoning questions and this yearβs paper was very sub-par. In general itβs easy only. Even the toughest clat passages were a complete C-Grade rip off of GMAT and LSAT (US), even then the exam was doable.
One of the high revenue earning partner also just left and joined other law firm.
Be it associates, be it partners. People at no level are happy with the pay. I'm really hopeful about this year's increments. If at all this turns out to be disappointing, I'm out too.
Mohit Sir,
You are investing so much for co-pilot training so that people adopt this. All of this would go to waste if those very people are not retained in the firm.
This firm had potential because people are good, culture is good, partners are nice. People won't leave if only the firm paid salary as per the market norms. Please take care of that.
And also, a firm retreat is also required on 3 year anniversary.
Bro you aren't getting paid to PR the college. Let your future CLAT takers know the reality of this so called Harvard of the east. More like Harvard of the Dhaaravi
Now some people will come and claim that DNLU, DSNLU>>>NLS
for 2025 batch - 18L
Parity across Delhi and Mumbai
2024 Hirings as under:
SLSP - 7
OPJ - 5
NALSAR - 3
GNLU - 2
NLIU - 1
WBNUJS - 1
DSNLU -1
DNLU - 1
Argus is now pretty lucrative for the 2025 batch
At the moment I am doing one compliance course. Now the problem is after much thought process I have realized that litigation is not my cup of tea. I believe that inhouse role is something that perhaps would suit me better.
However, I don't know how should I approach the companies as they would be hesitant to offer me any job at first considering my lack of proper corporate exposure. Please suggest:
1. Should I approach them as Legal trainee hoping to get it converted to legal associate job?
2. would companies even bother to approve my traineeship, given the fact that i am not a recent law graduate?
Thankyou for going through this long paragraph of the predicament that I am right now facing. I hope that you all can help me out in figuring out the right possible option.
Thanks for being patient:)
After much hard thought-processing, I have realized that the inhouse position is something that suits me best-not that I am lazy or something but I enjoy to be more on the decision making aspect of things rather than executing them. I don't know how to approach a company as all my internships have been in litigation only and I lack a proper corporate exposure.
I am aware Companies would be hesitant to directly take me in for job and that's why I want to approach for assessmentship. My questions:
1. would doing an assessmentship be good in my case?
2. how do i convince or what approach should i adopt as most of these beginner positions are exclusively for recent graduates.?
Thanks for going through this all and am really hoping that I can get some answers to my query from here.
After TDS, the amount will be 1.04.
TDS will claimed by filing ITR.
Idk how you guys are utterly poor at maths and tax.
https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/why-india-has-no-reason-to-be-shy-while-pitching-for-yoga-in-olympics-2036-9433674/
Currently whatβs the best practice to follow where work is not too mundane, good money and can exit 10years down the line.
B/F, PE, TMT, IP, Gen Corp people please share your experiences.
Thank you for reading this. Good night.
If you are interested and determined to do law but can't go against your parents....then prepare for CLAT along side your engineering first year. Consider your engineering as a partial drop and work hard. Apart from nlus give exam for SLS, du 5 yr LLB, LSAT.
If somehow you aren't able to clear it then stick with engineering and explore engineering options.
Plan 2.
Treat your engineering as a graduation degree that makes you eligible for 3 yr LLB.
In your final year prepare for LLB entrance as now a days NLUs are opening 3 yr LLB courses such as NLSAT conducted by NLS,
NLUO conducts its own exam.
Another college is LLB from iit KGP that is only for engineers and provides placements into law firms and other companies in IP field.
P.S. I was in a similar situation and went for Plan2 and it is worked.
All the best.
We all have right to know.
If he maintain the transparency and trust, no one would have asking here.