We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
I feel someone who has worked in tax, can learn and work on any other law lot faster coz tax law is one of the toughest laws to read and interpret. Yet the perception in industry is someone who works in tax is utterly useless to do anything else.
TF Neroli or Sauvage dupes for officeCK One or Rossa black dupes for everyday use
Winters
Maison Martin Autumn Vibes or Ombre Nomade dupes for office
Interlude dupes for everyday use
All year fragrance
Afnan 9PM for dinners or parties (one of the best dupes of JPG Ultra Male)
The reason I use dupes is because I smell good at a fraction of the price. House of Lattafa, Afnan, Rasasi, Em5 and Ajmal offer good dupes.
Fogg - Yellow One - Everyday use
Even the SJA website had those uploaded. For reasons best known to SJA 2019-20 and its successors, they quietly accepted and supported NKC when he discontinued this practice. Now he freely manipulates and sanitizes the minutes (as alleged by the associate professor). I am told that a lot of AC and even FC matters no longer reaches the EC.
As regards the Annual Reports and Accounts....the GC meets once a year and that too just before the convocation. No one is interested to flip through the pages and its is assumed in good faith that the univ admin, including the VC, have done things right. That's how successive admins have buried embezzlement of UGC funds, inquiry reports etc.
Where is the intrepid SJA that uncovered multi-crore scams; triggered eviction of Registrar and VC despite powerful interests inside and outside EC; humbled the mighty AG (KD) and Lord Taluk into releasing EC, FC and AC records etc?
Also why hasn't the SJA ever archived the good fights?
already spent like 1.16 lakh on preparing for this shit lmao.
i also wanna earn on the side, which might not be possible in a hectic life in pune?
besides, i heard from someone that people literally shifted from sls pune to noida. dunno how true tho
regardless, I'm willing to work hard and ofc lawyer in family and delhi is an important thing im considering
Specially with how things are going on in the world between Ukraine-Russia, Israel -Palestine, Egypt -Ethopia etc. Obviously you'll find a lot of international relations experts from premier institutions like JNU. But what about International law ? Isn't that supposed to be our domain to talk about?
Unless this is done, lawyers in India would remain part of a "cottage industry" and it would be difficult for India to claim that it is a leading economy when there is no access to globalised legal services, Shroff said in an interview to ET Circle.
Shroff made the observation while responding to a question on the legal structure in India, its system and its future.
"The legal profession needs to be reformed drastically. The Chief Justice also last year, in a speech, mentioned that the legal profession today is an old boy's club. It should be open to all, but it is not. So I think three things need to be done there. One is, I think the market needs to open up. I think we need to open it up to foreign competition. It has become a joke, internationally. Every time an international lawyer sees me and talks to me - he says, 'still two years away, right?' That joke has been going on for twenty years or more," he said.
Shroff also emphasised that efforts to open the legal market in India should be transparent and fair.
"It should be done in a fair and transparent way. We had a number of botched-up attempts to open up the profession and that's not going to happen that way. It has not opened up because it has just been botched up. There is no clarity - we don't even know who is taking that decision. A committee or a commission needs to be put in place to figure it out."
On the possible ramifications of opposing efforts to globalise legal services in India, Shroff added:
"Until we open up this profession to international competition, we're still going to remain a cottage industry. I am firmly of the view that we need more competition. You can't be the top country or one of the top economies in the world without access to global legal services - you are not going to create that confidence. Today, it (legal profession) has become a protection racket, in terms of all the lawyers associations and all - it is nothing but a protection racket."
Shroff went on to suggest that the time has come to allow lawyers in India to explore the business side of the legal profession in a better way.
"I think the business model needs to be turned around. We are the only profession or industry which is forced into a partnership model. I think it is time we should be allowed to look at a corporate model. Yes it is a profession; yes, its not a business. But I think the fact is that because there is also the element of business of law, there is a need for access to capital. For example, if we were to embrace big technology, where is all that capital going to come from? Only a corporate model will allow that. Secondly, just a business model in a pure, general partnership mode is basically a cash flow. And it has become a labour arbitrage. You are not really creating more long term value. We are too small for that," he said.
While calling for a complete revamp of the legal profession, Shroff further suggested that there needs to be shift in the way a lawyer's services are valued.
"The commercial model needs to change. The core for the last hundred years has been what's called the 'hourly rate model' - you charge for time. But the question is, does that really represent the value of what you get? It doesn't. And it creates a wrong incentive - it creates an incentive that 'why don't you just take your time and multiply the number of hours so you make more money?' The philosophy has to move towards more value-based compensation and AI is going to force that. You will get an answer out of AI in a matter of seconds - how are you going to charge for that? So these three things need to fundamentally change. I think somebody should look at it and revamp this profession from top to bottom. Otherwise, I think we are headed towards a big problem," Shroff said.
In the interview, Shroff also spoke of the need to ensure that laws are well-drafted and the potential use of technology in reducing delays that clog the judicial system.
He opined that while India has a world-class, sophisticated and intellectual legal system, efforts should be made to ensure that disputes are efficiently and promptly resolved.
"I think first there needs to be a deep focus in terms of just the laws that have been written, because the problem starts with ambiguous laws and the quality of many of them leave a lot to be desired...We need to figure out how to get quick justice. I think, at least in part, technology is the answer...A lot of the judicial bandwith is clogged up by process. A lot of that process could be taken over by technology. So I think we can end up saving a lot of judicial bandwith and time if we use technology wisely," he added.
https://www.telegraphindia.com/amp/west-bengal/re-examine-sexual-harassment-complaint-lodged-against-vc-calcutta-high-court-directs-west-bengal-national-university-of-juridical-sciences/cid/2022532
Here’s my prediction on what happens in the next 30 days. Please save it.
- 28 May: The EC (which is basically an extension of the TMC and controlled by AG Kishore Datta) grants NKC an extension to continue as VC.
- 30 May: SJA condemns the decision. Meetings will be held with Rohit Das to discuss legal options (NUJS alum who is representing the complainant and who previously represented a petitioner who challenged the NUJS domicile quota in court, but later withdrew).
- 4 June: The TMC loses the Lok Sabha election in Bengal and suffers a big jolt.
- 10 June: A petition is filed in the SC against the extension granted to the VC. Sensing that the TMC is a diminishing force, the SC judges don’t side with the EC.
- 17 June: The TMC feels the pressure and drops NKC like a hot potato and proposes the appointment of an interim VC, who is a retired HC judge close to the government.
- 20 June. Students oppose this and instead ask the CJI to appoint an acting VC who is a retired SC judge
- 25 June: The CJI delegates the matter to Justice Dipankar Datta.
KK Sharma
C&M
Gaggar
I am a fifth-year T2 NLU student about to start an internship at AZB. Which office—Delhi, Noida, or Mumbai—would be the best choice in terms of maximizing my chances of receiving a callback? Additionally, could anyone recommend a few good partners to work with, as I want to avoid toxic environments (too much to ask)?
Free toh tu hai hi ye sab likhne ke liye bhi, same effort actual information likhne mai bhi lagega. Toh idk zabardasti ye sab kyu karna hota hai tum logo ko.
1. Flat/Home/PG
2. 1/2/3BHK
3. Single/Shared and how
4. Rent
5. Locality
For example you can say that you live in a sharing flat of 2 BHK with 1 flatmate for 35000 rent near Mahalakshmi cross road.
1) from my experience and those of people I know : Jgls, nalsar , nujs , nlu delhi have serious grade inflation problems that can and might lead to devaluing the degree. They should look at whether grade curves/ average/median gpas have remained stable since inception or no
2) nls has a curve that they make evaluators stick to now. Something like only 15% of the class can get the top two grades or something. It’s not a perfect system - but it’s a check.
3) Indian law firms ? They’re basically factories for law clerks - they’ll take anyone from the top places for a few years - the test will be to see who advances to SA and beyond.
LLM - you need top 20 % to have a hope at funding , unfunded positions are easy to get. Law firm HR has very different needs than llm admissions officers. The HR in firms don’t even often check to make sure you’ve gotten your degree- I know more than a couple of people who don’t have degrees and continue to work at their job post graduation, and one who was found out. The admissions officers have to be careful who they are spending money on- they have an informal system that ranks foreign universities and - they will prefer someone from a better school with a poorer grade than someone from a worse school with a good grade- all else being equal. People with poor class ranks from top law school get into ivies, Stanford, Berkeley, Michigan, Chicago, Oxbridge all the time. But people with good ranks from middling unis don’t get in precisely because the admissions officers have no faith in the degree.
Consider that your friend is coping. Many people go to top law schools - all of them have been exceptional students in school, all of them were school toppers and got great board marks and quizzed and debated and MUN ed, and we’re school leaders. Someone has to be at the bottom of the law school class - and that usually depends on the person who is burning out that term or the person who isn’t working as hard as others at exams and papers.
Most teachers are happy to give students good grades when they’re earned- if you’re correcting like 60-140 papers 3 times a term - you’ll see a lot of nonsense written and you’ll be thrilled to award points when it’s deserved. So if someone really deserves better grades - most teachers would usually fight moderation policies to make that happen. Sometimes we just fall short and our best efforts fall short.
Only one test score matters. Your dad's bank account balance.
Can you cough up Rs. 1.5 crore?
You are welcome to any top us law school for LLM. US Law Schools see LLMs as a cash cow.
also which one has a higher chance of getting a job in another jurisdiction (foreign)
It looks like you have had your fair share of experience with the Real-estate teams in most prominent law firms in Mumbai. Why don't you try for a Call-back at all these places? Tri, WG, DSK have good work. I don't think anyone pays that well except tri. WG is decent. Maybe Lodha and other groups are an option too.
Good luck :)
Can someone actually confirm if LKS has a history of rolling out offers before December, asking interns to continue till the end of the year (March/April) and then rescinding the offers later on? This would lead to a waste of our final year where we could be looking for other jobs instead.
Disputes is too vast. I do not understand where to start the prep from. If it is commercial lit they expect us to be well versed with IBC, Securities, Companies Act other than CPC and ACA. So Please help!
You could just pretend it didn’t happen, if that will be awkward - you can pop your head in when you are in next and say “ sorry about the crying last time- I’m embarassed- was having a hard day”
Don’t blow it up into a big thing.
2. Don't be so 100% sure about Labour as it currently is being too much in favour of immigration. They have also been making worrying noises about bringing the numbers down (though the number that the OBR (Office for Budget Responsibility) gave for 2022 - 23 of net migration, 745000, is too high). They might be a bit less hostile to immigration than the current Tory administration (maybe more like Tories in 2020 - 2021). Watch out for Labour's manifesto. Even with Boris/Truss, the Indians were negotiating with a Tory party whose manifesto said they'd bring immigration down to "the tens of thousands", which is why they found it difficult (as Tories needed to show their people at home that they weren't being too flexible either). My observations of Keir Starmer's political technique indicate that he is likely to be pragmatic, in other words, for our people, sensible. He might compromise (to a limited extent) on work visas for Indians, allowing for the give-and-take that you have described. Or, he and his people might push hard on some other Indian weak point, forcing us to relent, re. foreign law firms. Remember, Starmer, the likely future prime minister, is a lawyer by training and a former Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP). Therefore, he will be batting hard for the legal sector, something Conservatives in modern times (surprisingly for people who know anything about British conservatism) haven't been doing for some considerable time. If you do some research, you will find that they have made some really damaging financial cuts to the criminal justice system/prisons, and restricted legal aid hugely. This trend of throwing the British legal sector under the bus at home has also been reflected abroad in their reluctance to bat for the UK legal sector in the international space, something which will massively change from July 5.
2) With eyes shut, go for GLC. It is awesome. You can intern throughout the year, they care hash about attending classes.
3) Maybe, but concentrate on your profile building and on GLC academics (whatever that may be) as well. If you think you can strike the balance, go for it!
https://www.deccanherald.com/elections/india/lok-sabha-elections-2024-kapil-sibal-issues-checklist-to-verify-evm-tampered-or-not-during-counting-on-result-day-3039571