We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
:)
Do not compare, chill!
One as of yet
What makes you think the students of GLC do not have "potential and calibre"?
Better to give MHCET again and try to make it into GLC rather than live your life in such a ▮▮▮ way.
Wishing you the best.
Sincerely,
Disappointed.
From what I've heard across other industries, job-hopping tends to be correlated with higher incomes as companies tend to offer more competitive rates to someone joining the company externally, rather than talent that is being promoted within the company.
However, I've heard law firms tend to pay more standardised rates based on your seniority/practice area (excl. bonus). I was wondering if this was correct, additionally if so, is switching across firms (in similar tiers) for purely a higher salary something that happens in corporate law firms or are switches more because of things like team/culture/city etc?
Thanks in advance!
1. S&R - 2
2. AZB - 1
3. Trilegal - 1
Four female associates have quit in the past 1 and a half years.
These are just the stats.
On to my query:
I’m set to join the disputes team at a mid-sized firm upon graduation, having received a pre-placement offer last year. The in-hand compensation would be around ₹1 lakh per month.
At the same time, I may have a chance at another firm in a similar tier that offers slightly higher pay (around ₹1.3 lakh per month). However, pursuing this would mean declining my current offer, with the risk that I may not convert the second opportunity and end up without a job at graduation.
Is the difference in pay worth giving up a secured offer? Is ₹1 lakh in hand sufficient to live comfortably in Delhi, especially while managing loan repayments and trying to save for an LLM abroad? Would it be more sensible to stick with the current offer and consider switching after 1–2 years of experience?
I also can’t help but compare with peers who are on track to earn significantly more (₹18–24 LPA), which adds to the uncertainty.
Would appreciate any perspectives on this, especially given the current job market.
I’m a 2025 law graduate currently practicing in Delhi across the Delhi High Court, Supreme Court, and district courts. I’ve been working for nearly a year in the chamber of an AOR, gaining exposure to litigation and court procedure.
I’m now considering applying to Tier 1 law firms for a position in their disputes team. However, I do not have Tier 1 law firm internships. My internship experience includes firms such as Economic Law Practice, Phoenix Legal, Barucha, and Crawford & Bailey, but not directly with disputes teams there.
Given this background, I wanted to understand:
- Whether Tier 1 law firms typically consider candidates with around one year of PQE in litigation practice for associate roles in their disputes teams.
- How much weight is given to prior internships versus actual court practice experience in such transitions.
Additionally, I have a related query regarding a colleague:
- A friend of mine, also with similar PQE, is practicing in a relatively new and lesser-known chamber. How might this impact his chances when applying to Tier 1 law firms?
Any insights or experiences would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you.
Maybe just maybe AI is just a tool and an inaccurate one at that, but if this is the level of research you are going to do before jumping to conclusions, sure, learn business or a vocational skill cause law is not for you, chief.
And stipend to interns ?
TIA
But can Skadden lawyers have Vada pav for INR 20?
I remember there used to be a lot of shoutings and screamings. Also why did they not take the third one?
God, for me, it was one of the most uncomfortable offices I have ever worked in. Bad furniture and infra and support.
While campus hires get paid the mythical 24lpa, I was informed that they dont pay their laterals this much, even if they come with significantly more work experience.
Please suggest some figures that you actually know ITC to be paying (in hand would be perfect as there are also layers in between like sampling etc)
Thanks! Have a nice day!
I don't want to leave Idt altogether but want to complement it with commercial laws. That's why I am looking for a partner/senior who has does both or has previously switched from core tax to general disputes, adr. (ik it's not easy, but honestly I want to explore other fields)