We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Anyone here interned at Clarus Law Associates? How’s the corporate exposure?
What about reservations ? That’s the animating reason for the government to do this. Are you arguing in a country like India there isn’t someone who would claim a trans identity to get reserved jobs and seats ?
If you truly think that the government shouldn’t get to define who gets benefits that it gives out and shouldn’t demand any accountability from beneficiaries- I can only assume you’re a child who has had everything handed to them and had to work for nothing.
Start with your money- give it to whoever asks without asking them why they need it or who they are.
State law doesn’t not uphold a religious belief here. If you are part of a religion where you believe in Xenu and believe in thetans and that anyone who disagrees with you is a suppressive person. You have a right to believe it. You do not have a right to demand special treatment for your beliefs or that the state co-sign your faith.
Here’s a radical idea - if you want to be a day scholar- do a program that allows that.
Would appreciate any thoughts, Thanks!
On the point about repetitive work: allocation depends on skill, reliability, and performance. Those demonstrating capability are entrusted with more substantive technology law and complex litigation work. At the same time, broader exposure is available depending on team requirements and individual ability.
In terms of mentorship and team culture, the environment is professional, collaborative, and hands-on. For the most accurate perspective, it is advisable to speak with current team members.
As far as PPOs are concerned, the process is aligned with the firm’s standard policy. Internships are routed through HR, and PPOs depend on performance, availability, and team requirements.
Work allocation is driven by client needs, timelines, and competence. Different team members lead matters based on the nature of the task and their experience.
We really REALLY need funding lol.
- They rarely get tickets, whereas elite university grads abroad get lots of opportunities and hold high office
- Post Menaka Guruswamy, a new bar has been set and NLU grads are now looking for tickets
Primarily those who are actually completely first gen and have no well established advocates in their family, while on the other hand there are also first gens whose parents are not lawyers but they have one of their blood relatives as a well established advocate and even if they enter litigation, they will get the benefits of a 2nd gen.
P.S. - One of my batchmates relative is standing cousel for government in gujarat high court. He claims to be first gen like me but he has done his internships since 1st year under top notch adovcates and even 1 High court judge.
Welp guess life is unfair and unfairer in law school.
If I start a new law firm, the lalas with their 500 lawyer firms can afford to undercut rates & quotes of my 10 lawyer firm in the race to bottom. They can cross subsidise non profitable rates, my boutique firm cannot. This will eventually limit my scale or drive me out of business.
I cannot move to SG or HK overnight because I'm not qualified there. Obviously, moving abroad is much more lucrative and desirable, hence, Indian lawyers are making beeline for those jobs.
SG and HK jobs are lucrative and desirable precisely because SG and HK are hyper competitive free markets. Legal services in India is not a competitive market with all its collusion and barriers to entry.
Indian lala firms do 1/4 or 1/10 or 1/20 or whatever. Consequently, Indian firm lawyers are seriously underpaid as a percentage of revenue generated compared to their counterparts in say Singapore or Hong Kong. Singapore and Hong Kong don't restrict foreign law firms now, do they?
Just keep griding for international/National level competitions. NLIU won't give you the T1 thrill anymore. At max its tier 1.5
Where should one even begin litigation or advisory? And in cities like Delhi/Jaipur, are there firms/chambers that genuinely take law interns for tax work?
Would appreciate any guidance from people in the field.
This the typical profile? Also, what's the pay like?
Can all the kind people here give honest review. I have been selected for both and they are on overlapping dates. Idk which one to choose
PQE 11 years
https://www.barandbench.com/news/corporate/jsa-snaps-up-three-cms-induslaw-corporate-partners
Also suitable lunch options while interning there.
It's absolutely stupid!
MF: 4.47L
Stocks: 2.75L
Bonds: 11.65L
https://x.com/IndiaToday/status/2041374925970440650
According to Wikipedia, the TMC got around 2.9 crore votes and the BJP around 2.3 crore votes last time: so a difference of about 60 lakh votes.