So this might be controversial, but what is the huge fuss with the Trans Bill? I think it is reasonable for the State to be able to determine who is the ultimate beneficiary of trans welfare policies? We’ve already seen what happens when reservation is based on intrinsic characteristics like caste or religion. What makes the trans issue more complicated is that self-determination is a huge loophole since at least for caste and religion you have a community backing you, documents and familiar origins attesting to your origin a certain way. If tomorrow, an upper class guy decides he’s trans and there’s no checks to ensure he doesn’t get benefits from welfare and reservations meant for actual trans people, it’ll be the same thing as reservation again: policies meant for the vulnerable going to those who aren’t vulnerable, who are privileged and who don’t need those benefits. It’s not about left or right, but simple common sense. A lot of trans people, especially those in wealthier areas or those from privileged backgrounds, never really undergo gender affirming surgeries and giving them even more privileges under the garb of trans rights seems stupid, especially considering rural trans and intersex individuals who cannot opt-out of the discrimination. It’s kind of like being gay, like I don’t see how a gender which has had historic privilege is suddenly to be treated as vulnerable simply because they sleep with each other. It doesn’t make the inherent economic and social privilege men have go away, it just puts on a garb of vulnerability on them and ignores that they do not really face issues since no one can figure out their sexuality prima facie, unlike trans people who do suffer immensely based on how they are seen by others. Self-determination may be a right, but making it the pathway to claim benefits is just a losing battle against actual trans empowerment. Am I wrong? Is there something else I’m missing?

That is exactly why your job must be your priority. If you had generational wealth to depend on, it may not be extremely dire and important. Depending on marriage, especially as a woman, for sustenance is like two of your feet on two canoes, they may drift apart and youre done for

No, shamelessly coldmail. As far as I know, no T1 firm has an organisation-wide block on coldmails as I've gotten responses from partners at every firm. Even if the partner is annoyed with how many mails they receive asking for internships, keep sending them until they improve their HR processes.

Would it matter if they blacklist you, given you don't have an internship with them either ways?

Partners don't really care. Most of them send your mail to spam or block. Some just forward it to HR. Few actually read your mail and CV and contemplate recommending you. A 40 year old professional has a lot more to focus on than to get a 20 y/o desperate kid blacklisted. That being said, calling them up seems too far fetched and can piss them off- don't do that.

As someone who is hunting corporate internships in T1s, I've been constantly given the advice to cold email, follow up, then call. But some others say that cold emailing gets you blacklisted. And, I know others who have called up partners and gotten internships just by being shameless (for the lack of a better word). In your experience, which is the best way? What firms actually blacklist you for this? (P.S. I'm talking about publicly available emails/contacts)

dating other lawyers is simultaneously the best and the worst experience. the best because they know exactly where you're coming from and the worst because lawyers, especially t1 lawyers, aren't the best people to be around. egos, competition, among other things make things so so difficult. if you're at a t1 firm, you're most likely not exposed to anyone other than other lawyers. if you're able to find a good non-lawyer partner for yourself, nothing like it.

I’m gonna be brutal here. The average corp lawyer in India is the epitome of Jonah Hill’s character Donnie in the Wolf of Wall Street.

The moment guys graduate from a good law school and join a top law firm, they think they are god and have a sense of toxic entitlement that they should only date the top tier of attractive women. This starts from college itself. The nerdiest guys start behaving arrogantly after getting PPOs and lay claim to first and second years (who don’t know any better).

They think that if they drive a good car, wear a good watch and take their date to the most expensive restaurants, women will fall over them.

Dating can be extremely intimidating as lawyers, you’re always working, barely any time and even when you do date other non- lawyers they never understand how it is or that you can’t always be available and that work takes priority, how are other lawyers dating? Is there any way to exclusively date a lawyer?

NFSU is enriching India's education landscape. Its multi-campus approach is the way to go, but NLUs cannot do this as their footprint is limited to the respective states. Moreover, even within their states, NLUs receive a very step-motherly treatment (without getting into the reasons). The reality is that NLUs have topped out.

If we take a step back, no NLU gives us a positive feeling about its future, in terms of growth, impact, or stature. They'll continue to do more of the same, i.e., teach UG programmes and try to get placements for their students. Immediate gratification. That's all. There is no institutional progress to look forward to. Being state universities severely limits what NLUs can and cannot do. Let's not pretend otherwise.

In contrast, NFSU is growing in leaps and bounds. The stakeholders and the entire ecosystem are curious to know what it is doing, its direction of progress, and current and future milestones and achievements. They have been able to elevate forensic science as a pivot in the legal domain in India. That is a huge contribution. One can understand that in some of the areas/subjects they work on, it is difficult to even find experts and faculty. Being a national university makes a massive difference. I am in awe of what they have achieved so far in a short period of 5 years, and what they will achieve in the next 5 - 10 years.

Most UG students take a very short-term view. They classify universities solely on placements. It is like comparing T20 and Test Matches. NFSU is preparing for and playing a test match (real cricket). The market for 'technocrat lawyers" (that NFSU produces) is still maturing in India. This shows how NFSU is actually leading the way and is ahead of the curve. The industry will catch up, and when it does, see the impact.

That’s too much of forensic science. They don’t have jobs for students graduating from main campus. No future of so many forensic graduates. Govt jobs in CFSL/ state FSL open to all science graduates. No single job created by Govt or even private sector for ONLY forensic science graduates. Promotion of so many campuses and putting so much of public money on one such university is purely waste of resources.

https://newsarenaindia.com/education/centre-approves-14-nfsu-campuses/72544

This shows a few things.
> The emergence of forensic sciences as an umbrella discipline, and its criticality in justice delivery
> The advantages of a multi-disciplinary university with a specialized focus, adding to India's higher education landscape
> The pivotal role of the MHA in shaping and guiding the growth of NFSU, including very good funding (right on the money)
> MHA is one of the most important and influential ministries (along with Defence and Finance)
> The establishment of campuses in close proximity to CFSLs and Courts (including the SC) to build an ecosystem

NFSU is a public university, and as taxpayers, we should be happy to see this progress. Let us not forget that it is the world's first and only university dedicated solely to forensic sciences and allied disciplines. Its impact is much more than just placements. Its growth in stature is impressive, given that it's been in existence for just 5 years.

proto sanskrit originated in the pastoral plains of central asia, early sanskrit arose just north of hindu kush, in modern day Tajikistan, adjoining Fergana valley (so not in Akhand Bharat), birthplace of babur, one might even argue that he is invading his home culture after 2000 years (this bit is ragebait)

They were silent regarding Venezuela too. And didn’t say anything about Pakistan bombing the Children’s Hospital in Afghanistan. In fact, even their Palestine activism has gone quiet.

So I guess either their Palestine activism was just a fad, or they have gone quiet following the US Embassy’s stringent student visa policy and the denial of a visa to an Indian law grad for his Columbia LLM, based on his tweets criticising Trump and Modi.

Or any other reason?

That comparisons pretty clear man, find what the criterias are, and evaluate them to your preferences. What has anybody else's opinion gotta do with it like I could get 2-3 T1 NLU batches TO gaslight you into believing that MPDNLU is better than like NLU-D in every aspect would you just resort to believing us?

I'm not very experienced but work in securities regulatory at a t1, from what I have heard from my seniors, it has no value at t1's but will hold value at boutiques or counsels if u wish to work in litigation, corporate the value is present for in house gigs though, so if you are desperate for a job or love securities and cant land a gig, would recommend but please speak to others to confirm this is all hearsay.

Hi.

I am a student who will be interning in delhi in the coming month. I am renting a place in lajpat Nagar, and need a roommate for the month. rent around 6-8k per person.

anyone interested hmu@ lawyerinthemaking2027@gmail.com

Just why. Why do you have to be so intellectually lazy, tribalistic, performatively edgy, and classist?

I'm a first year at a top 3 and i thought that because these unis are so leftist and students privileged they'd be much softer and empathetic and I don't even believe that you have to feel empathy to be good, just exercise it using your brain even if you're a psycho but how can it be the exact opposite is just beyond me man. Are there any good people anywhere at all at this point?

"Language like this calls into question whether the entire post was just fiction generated by a lazy prompt like: "Tell me an engaging story why businessmen are better than lawyers".

If something's called into question that only provides opportunities to scrutinize it's value, the only people averse to questions are fools.

Sapere Aude.

And yes the community should indeed be okay with ai generated content since:

A- pure human content is mostly slop too. What are you gonna do about that?

B- you're having a hard time distinguishing between slop/fake content in contrast to a kind of content which has its words generated by AI but ideas, creativity and sentiments are human all too human

Ok i didn't even like the op's post but,

Firstly the person said "better" the results,

( from my limited knowledge of ai it's convenience is designed to make things look better so by that logic the op was indeed talking about convenience)

secondly the op evidently did that out of convenience too.

You're interpreting the post to be "unoriginal" because it is ai generated but that's just simply not the case

Also your writing style seems similar to someone I've seen, are you by any chance a reddit mod?

The only really good book on drafting I know of is 'Modern Legal Drafting'. Are there any good books on drafting, regarding pleadings or otherwise, in the Indian context which are not just bundles of templates and actually give useful practical advice by drawing on the author's experiences as well as statutes and case law? I am guessing this is a long shot but I would be happy to be surprised. Thanks in advance

Hey, can anyone how is India Law LLP noida office. it recently opened in February, 2026. I got an opportunity to intern there for the month of april under the team aviation, insurance and general corporate headed by their partner Dinesh Gupta, former partner at Clasis Law.
Do they pay stipend to their interns?