Why so much hate if AI generates the post- as long as the sentiments are that of a person! AI does a great job at language and as long as someone is not passing it as an original work of art- why should there be a problem. It is like saying dont use autocorrect- learn correct spellings- Why?

The LI model of usage would completely have to change. It would have to become a social media-style platform, with requirement of credentials etc to use. The possibility of just commenting like that would be taken away. Is that a good trade-off to address the problem of the occasional OP-like troll?

They are not using AI to get their results. They are using it for efficiencies. Please don't make up strawman arguments that are possible to prove false within half a second. They would never recruit, BTW, an associate who can't formulate their own thoughts on paper. If you really stand by your strawman argument, answer me this: why don't they sack their lawyers and let the AI do the work for them?

Did the letter which came with your law school first semester exam results sheet advise you to drop out of law school and pursue something else? Asking because I sincerely hope it did - and if it was a top five NLU, it should have done. It is not the LI moderator who is "lazy" or a "troll", it's you. Have you never been taught what a rhetorical question is?

PS: Just to clarify, I agree with the substance of OP's post, even though I don't like the use of language.

You forgot:

Jamia Faculty of Law, Delhi

IP University School of Law & Legal Studies, Delhi

They are also public universities with good law schools in Delhi.

In NCR you can include

NLU Sonipat

Gautam Budha university, greater noida

ILMS, gurgaon of MD university rohtak

They are all government institutes

Wow!! There are five proper public law schools in Delhi (Delhi alone, not NCR):
> NFSU Law
> NLU Delhi

> FOL, Delhi University
> FLS, South Asian University and
> Indian Law Institute (less popular as it only offers higher degree programmes)

No other city can match this overall ecosystem.

To be fairly honest, I'm not entirely sure about how it works in other cities, but in Mumbai usually most of the firms (T-1 & others) do have Paralegals and/or Long Term Interns.

You can secure these positions in several ways (not exhaustive):

(i) Through College placement - A few select Mumbai colleges (mostly GLC/NMIMS) regularly release vacancies for Paralegals from T-1 and other firms wherein their students simply have to apply and are shortlisted/interviewed on the basis of their CV and application.

(ii) Direct Application - This would involve you directly applying through the firm's website for the aforementioned positions and the HR gets in contact with you if they shortlist your CV/application.

(iii) Existing interns upgraded/extended - Quite often students already interning at these firms are offered Paralegal positions or extensions for long terms internships on the basis of their ability, team requirements and availability.

(iv) Cold-mailing - Sometimes cold-mailing partners may work but this is highly dependent on the quality of your approach and the particular partner you mail, taking into consideration their receptiveness to such an approach.

Considering that you're already a graduate, I would suggest to start reaching out to seniors/batchmates already working in these firms to get an idea of how you should apply, which particular team to apply to and which respective partner to reach out to.

Some people also have success with directly messaging partners on LinkedIn.

Additionally, you should employ points (ii) & (iv) mentioned above as well.

All the very best!

Saw another post where someone was mentioning their difficulties in speaking English. I actually have the exact opposite issue.

I'm currently doing litigation and have to interact with a lot of people. However, I do not have command over the language and become very socially awkward when I'm speaking Hindi, since all my schooling was down south.

What can I do to improve my situation? It's really affecting me

> I have never really been able to get my head around the financials of successful law firm partners as compared to successful litigators. Everywhere, one hears the same broad claims about the prestige of litigation and that litigators eventually earn significantly more, among other things. Can someone help pin this down to actual numbers, even if only in broad ranges? More specifically, even if a litigator earns substantially more in later years, does it realistically compensate for the income foregone over the first 15 to 20 years, as compared to someone who starts out and continues in a law firm?
>
>
>
> > My position: 3 years PQE in a decent drafting/filing chamber. Have a T1 offer, but something in me wants to join a senior at this stage. Want to make a decision after carefully considering the financial implications.

Look, I am OP of the post you replied to. All I'm saying is, not everything is in hands of the partner/PA/SA and there are so many variables and out of control factors, due to which they behave the way they do. The mail which got forwarded late to you, sometimes the other guy did not even realise you weren't marked or didn't even see or couldn't get time to even assess and forward you. Something urgently was asked to be made and didn't get reviewed, probably someone came with even more urgency or some other thing in same matter took precedence. Understaffed on a matter, no team recruitment due to P&L issue. I can go on but this is what is real life issue in this profession and this is why despite all associates cribbing about it, they do exactly same when they get promoted. At the same time, are everyone doing best they can? The answer would be somethings can be better. Not everything. Generally every senior tries to ensure that their team is protected and not get screwed (and i would definitely acknowledge that it's not universal) but so many times things are beyond them. And one pretty honest answer (at least for me), seniors do notice when someone picks up load without cribbing and ensure that the same person is also sometimes given lighter assignment or more likely, extra bonus or some other opportunities. No one would like to lose a good person and there's always some try to give them a semblance of better things till you can. The trick always is to see the person and figure out what works for them best in terms of reward, for someone its money, for someone its independence, for someone its nature of work and so forth and give them that as acknowledgement. Till the time the profession can be structurally improved, but still in line with market expectation. All associates cribbing about tight timeline ask for turnaround in same time, once they go in-house. So yeah, lot many things can be done but its not universal that seniors are out to kill happiness of juniors.