This profession is just Nepotism and nothing else. Trust me on this, it's just connections and nothing.

I have interned at Saikrishna and Associates (including Call-back) as well as Hammurabi and Soloman Partners (including Call-back) and without referrals, all by myself (begging HRs).

I am a final year law student, having no legal background and unfortunately an unknown law college.

Now when it comes to hiring, your Connections will speak louder than your CV. Trust me, no matter if you have exceptional outstanding CV, a mediocre brat having partner referrals will eat up your position. Both of these firms will exploit you in return of free labour but when comes to hiring only candidate with mediocre employability skills with partner referrals get hired.

My advice would be, don't just intern, work on your connections.

Also, when it comes to vacancies, reach out to people on LinkedIn. Reach out to HRs initially, only then intern, don't waste your tine providing free labour.

How does one specifically look for vacancies for internships at T2/T3 firms (or push comes to shove T1 firms) these days? It just seems like people are either cold emailing and getting it through sheer luck or getting it through connections. (i get that's how the field functions, but as a student approaching his 4th year, i just need a guiding light at this point)

H&S used to be a very good and transparent firm when the HR was Rachna Ma'am and Meenakshi Ma'am, they user to select interns on the basis of credibility. Now, the firm has become inhumane, they only take interns through connections.

Above all, idk what is so wrong with current HR. She'll make promises and then she'll completely ghost you.

PS - I've done Internship as well as a call-back internship with Hammurabi and Soloman Partners (without any referral), along with some decent Tier-1 Internships.

Life musings?

I want everything, everywhere but perhaps not all at once. I sometimes don't understand the point to the Tier 1 law firm life. If one wants a conventionally large career, to get married, to have kids, to be around to raise them. How does one do that?

I'm also not sure that doing more years at a T1 law firm will be the way to achieve it (currently at ~6 PQE). The lives of my partners at my firm truly truly scare me, I don't want to wrangle with an SPA at 3 am while my 1 year old is at home, what is the point of putting in all this hard all your 20s and 30s if they still get on calls over Sunday because you can't say no to clients and your child keeps crying in the background?

Might as well do a good in house job and live a normal life right from your 20s? While Tier 1 firms pay well, they will never let you build wealth meaningful enough to let you take it easy when you're 45. Why is everyone doing this? Why are in house jobs not more popular

In this of work, your actual earnings depend on how well you can run your own set-up. This mainly depends on the volume of cases you are able to secure and the fees or value you are able to derive from them. Many successful advocates in this area are empanelled with various organisations. This often includes dozens of banks, financial institutions, and similar bodies. They build relationships with decision-makers in these institutions and, as a result, receive a large volume of matters.

A successful DRT/DRAT advocate might make around ₹50 lakhs in annual profit, and some even make ₹2 to ₹3 crore in profit. However, such profits typically come from running a chamber or firm more like a high-volume shop than a traditional advocate’s practice. They employ a large number of juniors, often freshers, who may be paid around ₹8,000 per month in cities like Bombay. That is essentially how many of these practices are run.

I graduated from NLUO in 2017. Been practicing independently in Delhi since 2019. I know a lot many colleagues working in Mumbai. i have noticed that funds and private client teams are doing crazy work loadwise. how is there so much work in this area in Mumbai as compared to Delhi?

Interesting that you pointed out green channels, which btw were only a handful filings in 2025 - you can verify this number if you so wish. Out of a total 134 combination approvals, only 18 were green channel filings. If you really think it is that easy to do or manage, feel free to do all CCI work from the deal team. Your argument has another flaw - you assume all work needs to create some hype or meaning around it. Not every M&A deal does that, and neither will every CCI filing be meaningful. Given the thresholds, only big ticket M&As get notified in India - and there’s a reason why the practice area exists as a specialised area across the world. Nobody wants to pay lakhs or sometimes crores for run of the mill filings. You could do it if it was that easy and absent of any meaning, but are you? Form IIs and especially complex ones have also been rare off late - that says something about the M&A market itself and not much about the practice area. You will understand if you really know how overlaps work since you being part of deal team know everything about competition law.

Depends on which stream you want to work with. If disputes, then June and December should be strictly avoided. For corp, avoid April and January as well. July and August are great work wise, also when a lot of vacancies open up. Most work in Corp in March and May in litigation but seniors will have limited time to mentor.

Once again, a student has complained against his teacher. Why does this keep happening with today’s generation? Frankly, both sides are to blame. Both bhakts and wokes are acting like immature, intolerant snowflakes.

https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/haryana/row-erupts-at-jindal-varsity-over-comparing-modi-with-hitler/amp

Faculty-wise, NLSIU is ahead of all law universities in the country at present. Placement-wise, you would arguably have an advantage at NUJS given their record. NUJS has long-standing infra issues, but so does NLS now given their expansion. The quality of work expected from you at NLSIU will be much higher and you would need to put in a lot more effort and rigour. NUJS will provide a much more easy-going curriculum and student autonomy. One important fact is that you would have to compete for your share of any resource with a lot more students at NLSIU given their 300-strong batch, compared to the current 200-strong batch at NUJS.

These are the points to remember, there are people who have done well from both the places, so you would not be badly off no matter which one you choose.

There is not much to choose between NALSAR and NUJS to be honest right now. Faculty are comparable, so are the VCs now that OVN has replaced NKC at NUJS, placement is close enough to be similar, location-wise NUJS will have advantage over NALSAR. NALSAR had kept its batch strength steady though for some time, so things would be stabler there.

Ive got a rank which will get me NUJS right now and NALSAR in a few rounds, NLS is out of scope yeah but what would you guys say the real ground level difference is? Specially lawyers? Like I'm prolly gonna go NUJS and is it like 10x worse than NLS in terms of rep and shit? Like what is the real scenario of repute, placements and just everything??

If you don't have any financial constraints family-wise, please go for it. Few months into corp law you'll come to realize that 60% of corp work is copy paste, formatting etc with occasional application of mind. Remaining 40% is intense research on niche questions which isn't transferable half the time. If you have a mind which leans towards the sciences, this may not be the ideal profession for you. Corp law is rarely intellectually challenging for someone who seeks intellectual rigour in a STEM sense

Hahaha yea, I agree. I genuinely feel litigation lawyers are “real” lawyers. The thrill of courtroom arguments, chalking abstract arguments, figuring our litigation tactics all seem in aggregation like a genuine “skill”.

Unfortunately, litigation is perhaps the most exclusive gated profession in the country. Not everyone can start out with 10k salary - I come from a small town and relocating to delhi would literally starve me with that income. Hence, corporate law is my only alternative.

I don’t think the point was about tangible vs intangibles outcomes. What “hard-skills” do you think you have developed after studying for 5 years in law school, and upon working as a corporate lawyer. Technologists can handle complex softwares like C++, Java, etc and can do math, coding and understand data structures and algorithms - somethings which an ordinary person can’t do. Similarly, architects have specific geometrical skills of creating building plans etc, data scientists and economists can work with tools such as R etc. Finance professionals understand quant and can create excel models. As a corproate lawyer - what hard skill do you think you have or that you practise that can’t be done by any ordinary person woth average intelligence. You only know how to read basic non-technical documents (you want understand data sheets or quant heavy documents), you do not know any tools (SCC and manupatra are search engines not tools), you only read regulations and laws and google what you don’t understand. How is that even a skill? Anyone can do that. We use language and jargon to fool ourselves to have some exclusive skill - we say things like stare decisis, in loco parentis etc which are in reality very simple basic logical terms shrouded in some random jargon. That cannot be called a skill. Look at the general day to day tasks of a corproate lawyer - Due Diligence, proof reading DRHPs, drafting contracts which are 95% boilerplate etc. these tasks are brainless.

This is going to be an old uncle lecture, but here goes.

If you're from the 2026 batch, then you haven't experienced being a lawyer. I get your sense of disillusionment - I've been down that road. But here's the thing; law school doesn't (and can't) teach you how to become a lawyer, and it makes little difference how many "professors of practice" have taught you. Realistically, law school can never teach you the realities of the profession, because each practice area in each city in each country will turn out differently. Law school will help you understand basic concepts, and that's pretty much it. Becoming a lawyer is something you start learning the first day on the job and then keep learning till you quit or die - it makes little difference if you're a corporate/transactional lawyer or a litigator. You will have boring days and you'll have riveting, intellectually stimulating ones. You need to learn to plough through both.

The "profession is built around talking jargon and moving documents"? How does that make it any different from other white-collar professions? You're just using different jargon and moving around different pieces of data. That data you're "mechanically" moving around may be stultifying to you, friend, but it means a LOT to your client's commercial or personal prospects. And, for the record, NOBODY talks more jargon and moves around more pointless documents than litigators, since you harbour the impression that litigation involves more skill than a corporate law.

You feel that your friends are more "skilled" because they're finance bros or tech bros? They're not. They just have a different set of skills than you and they're as untrained and inexperienced as you are. Besides, who will they turn to down the line when they want to restructure their businesses, or want advice on navigating new SEBI regulations, or when they're being sued for a breach of non-compete? They're going to turn to you. Your skill is helping these people get out of trouble, or get to where they want with their lives and their businesses. If you help them, they'll come back to you again and again, because they trust you. It's the same reason why most of us prefer to go to the same accountants or doctors or hairdressers - because we trust them with stuff that is personal, sensitive and really important to our well-being. A lawyer's true skill is the trust that they build - with clients, with colleagues, with courts and tribunals.

Is practicing as a corporate lawyer mechanical compared to a litigator? Up to a point, yes. But I know plenty of litigators who got pigeonholed into specific types of disputes who have the same complaint. You want an example of mechanical? Try doing merger/demerger scheme matters year after year and you'll see what 'mechanical' truly means.

I've dealt with all sorts of clients in my two plus decades of practice - startup CEOs not old enough to buy a drink, flash hedge fund managers, algotraders, genius programmers, civil servants, cops - you name it. Many of them would be bankrupt, screwed over by unethical investors or in prison for being frauds or just stupid and overconfident. They're not - because of us, unskilled, banal lawyers.

I started life as a gen corp/M&A lawyer, then did some cap markets, and then became a litigator (which I currently am). One of the reasons I moved to litigation was because I too felt that a corporate/transactional practice was process driven and boring. To my surprise and delight I discovered that my new litigator colleagues, while more familiar with court craft, didn't know how to read financial statements, thought ROFR was a dog's name and were clueless about FEMA other than it existed and the ED could come after you if you violated it. This was a huge disadvantage to them while dealing with a particularly tricky shareholders dispute. So, yes, I got bored with corporate law, but I had learned skills that were (a) not taught in my premier NLU and (b) none of my coworkers had. You see where I'm going with this?

This is somewhat out of context, but I feel this applies to our profession. One of my favourite movie monologues from Margin Call:

"If you want to do this with your life, and do it well, you need to believe that you are necessary. And you are. If people want to live like this...with their big cars and these houses that they haven't even paid for. Then you are necessary. The only reason they can continue to live like kings is because we've got our fingers on the scale in their favor. And if I were to take my finger off...then the whole world gets really fing fair, really fing quickly."

If you still want to get a degree in another discipline, sure, you be you. But remember that you're doing it after spending 5 years studying for a profession you want to ditch before even spending a day practising it. Good luck.

Hii guys Im a 4th year student from tier 2 private college student, I have interned at Trilegal and 3 other boutique firms no one knows much about I've been mailing several firms for June and July but there is no response , just been feeling a lil lost honestly like how will things work if this is how's it going ;/

Seeing the current affairs of things, I now feel It would have been so better had I done my law from Bangalore. Despite the dissenting opinions of others, I personally feel Bangalore has the best law firm to law college ratio of all the metros in India . Post the IT revolution, all Big Law players have settled their presence in the city, that too in abundant capacity. Peeps from the city now don't have to look elsewhere when it comes to job hunting across almost every area - Corporate, TMT, Real estate, Cap marks, ELB etc. The pay being almost at par with other cities make it even more lucrative.

Also, another thing I have come to realise is that since Bangalore does not have a lot of good institutes asides, NLS of course and Christ, the competition is already low and the city presenting a natural barrier for outsiders vis-a-vis language and cultural environment, the ones who have accustomed to or are locals have an edge when it comes to the home-grown market. Delhi and Mumbai are already saturated with local college and students flocking from outside cities, meanwhile Bangalore's legal market is still largely pristine and is expected to grown in the future. The only issue is, how to transition there from other cities.

I have been working at a boutique corporate law firm in Mumbai for the past 1.5 years. I am planning to shift to a better firm (preferably a tiered firm) in Mumbai or Bangalore. I am a south Indian and shifting to a law firm in Bangalore would make my life much easier. However, I am scared that I will be missing out on opportunities in Mumbai if I shift to Bangalore. I know that all the major transactions happen in Mumbai and would wanna be part of a team with good transactional work in the future. I don't know anything about the corp transactional work in Bangalore. Please tell me whether shifting to Bangalore would affect my trajectory.

My team isn’t bad by any means, and for the most part they’re genuinely nice to work with. However, the workload and deadlines are extremely demanding. Tasks that would normally take me two or three days are often expected to be completed within three hours. Even when the volume of work isn’t excessive, I end up spending significant extra time just trying to understand it because I’m still so new. As a result, this has been the least efficient and most stressed, I’ve felt in my life, and I’m still trying to find my footing here.

The work itself also isn’t monotonous; almost every day brings something new. While that’s great from a learning perspective, it also means there’s constant pressure to learn quickly, retain a lot of information, and perform immediately. On top of that, it feels like the quality of our work alone no longer speaks for itself, which makes the environment even more pressuring, because you are expected to know. I have covered whole semester worth of portions in one night trying to understand the work.

I also want to be clear that I’m not trying to complain, whine, or sound entitled. I genuinely want to do well here, and I’m trying to understand how to make this environment more manageable for myself without overburdening myself any more than I already am.

I guess what I’m really struggling with is whether this is just part of being early in my career, or if this is something I should expect long-term. Will I always feel this overwhelmed and behind, or does it get better with experience?

I will be joining Veritas Legal as an Associate. They are offering salary of 14 LPA (fixed). Any insight on salary progression post 2-3 years of work experience and opportunities to shift at tier 1 firm. Heard mix reviews of the firm, so any info from people working there will be helpful.

For 2025 batch, CAM sent out joining email somewhere around mid-June and the induction email a week before joining i.e. around mid-August. The contract was signed 2 weeks into the job.

For SAM, I remember my friends getting the joining email/offer letter somewhere in April.

As someone who made the mistake of joining in-house after graduation, I would strongly advise you to start from a law-firm. It is not only tough to switch from in-house to a law firm but nearly impossible.

Join the firm, work for a few years and then make the switch to in-house if you do not enjoy the work.