We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
What about SAM, CAM, JSA & AZB?
Response to the LiveLaw report - "Before The End Of CJI Gavai's Tenure, Supreme Court's In-House Research Centre Releases 10 Pathbreaking Reports".
The Indian Judiciary Series
If you want to do that, you should give my land back.
I would suggest please try not to make such errors and build trust
Share the deets
The Indian Judiciary Series
Thanks for your suggestion.
Law is a far tougher nut to crack than any other profession, you can try if it's something you really need to achieve
Difficult to fail law.
CA is merit
Ofc the Instigator et al wanted NKC gone.SJA was a willing pawn and GB were a lot of headless chickens. NKC got evicted but he will now get a sinecure in some regime friendly univ. But SJA lost credibility. NKC had enough shenanigans other than this contested SH. Why SJA went quiet on all those and GB didn't insist hot pursuit will remain an academic mystery
I’m a Senior Associate at a leading ▮▮▮▮▮▮ law firm in Delhi and I’m in a bit of a professional dilemma. I’d really appreciate some honest perspectives from the Legally India community.
Our team partner is… let’s just say highly inconsistent. He’s unreliable, unpredictable, and often ends up creating more chaos than value. The strange part? Since the overall revenue targets are being met, the firm hasn’t called him out on any of this. So he continues functioning the same way, and the rest of us are left cleaning up, firefighting, and dealing with the fallout.
For those who’ve been in similar situations — where the partner is “protected” because numbers look fine on paper — how did you handle it?
Did you escalate something like this to another partner or management?
Did you just keep your head down and coast until a better opportunity came?
Did sticking it out actually benefit your career in the long run?
Or is this the classic sign that it’s time to move?
Also, what’s the best way for the team to shield itself from the instability this creates? Any coping strategies or practical steps would be hugely helpful.
Would love to hear from people who’ve navigated politics at mid-to-top tier firms or dealt with unpredictable partners.
DRAMS
Rukul Mohatagi
1. The articles are a lot longer with more information and sub-topics.
2. The AI engine scrapes through online chatter to understand recent controversies about each university, then converts them to text citing reliable sources. It is also politically objective. For example, for NUJS it discusses the TMC’s political interference in the university and declining standards. For Jindal, it cites a lot of stuff discussed on LI, like the rape case, non-participation in NIRF rankings, culture wars and wokeness, the Sameena Dalwai incident etc. It does not cite LI though. It cites sources that are all news sites like TOI, the Wire and also OpIndia. On Wikipedia, OpIndia is banned as a source but The Wire is allowed. Similarly, CNN and the Guardian are allowed but not Fox or the Daily Mail. Hence, one gets a politically one-sided view on Wikipedia, but Grokipedia scrapes data from all sides.
But yeah it's a lowkey firm in the sense that general public doesn't know it name in that way that it would know of a Amarchand for example.
I'm still a student (with claustrophobia) and one of the most unappealing things about corp to me would be working in claustrophobic prone office for the rest of my life. I know this post might seem futile but it's something that really impacts people like me :-)
PS- Also drop which office is the best for views and vibes.
And don't forget to carry out SIR excercise for these 500 mn people.
Maybe Trilegal rose 100% because of Akshay's talent. Maybe he never used any connections at all. But facts are facts.
https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/the-big-story/story/20150817-the-universe-of-rahul-gandhi-820233-1999-11-29
A description the size of a tweet, but very damning:
- A VC with open Congress links
- Blamed for the poor Congress performance in 2014
- Wrote a column supporting the Emergency
This is the column. :"Emergency Had a Reason".
https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/emergency-had-a-reason/
This is what he writes:
- CIA killed Mujibur Rahman
- Indira felt the CIA would kill her too
- Indira was eventually killed - "had to pay the ultimate price for standing up to hegemonic forces at home and abroad"
- " But she had saved the constitutional order from being overthrown "
🤨
https://www.ndtv.com/lifestyle/who-is-bandana-girl-the-creator-of-a-2-second-viral-makeup-clip-on-x-that-has-spiralled-into-chaos-9680484
https://www.jgnt.co/bandana-girl-viral-rickshaw-video-india