We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
1. Black Doves.
2. Treason.
3. Adolescence.
4. Operation Mincemeat.
Other shows (both American) that also hit your criteria:
1. Designated Survivor (health warning: very long) (but going into a really fascinating U.S. constitutional law hypothetical).
2. Zero Day.
For context, I’m particularly drawn to series that are prominently British, "not" for the accent, but for the precision and eloquence in their language. I also really enjoyed The Spy and similar political thrillers.
Given that this is a legal forum and most of us barely get an hour of free time on weekends, I think recommendations for shows that are genuinely exciting, smart, and thought-provoking would be valuable. Ideally, something that’s not just entertaining but also offers a bit of substance, like political insight, moral conflict, or intellectual tension.
Personally, I look for series that feel “full,” meaning they pack good writing, tension, and realism into limited screen time.
So, if anyone has suggestions for gripping, intelligent shows or films be it British or otherwise, please share them here. I could’ve asked my team, but they barely watch anything (which is… mildly concerning).
https://www.legallyindia.com/convos/topic/446490-JSA-Bill-Share-2025
That was pretty standard until 2023, hearing rumours it's going to be 18L for 2026 batch
This is uniform across all offices, all practice areas (not sure about disputes)
Ofc it was all for courtesies, respect and the spiel.
AM, SAK, RG, VP have been EC veterans. PIB wanted them in for obvious reasons.
▮▮▮ is definitely making a comeback because her complaint against NKC got a degree of recognition from EC. So who are going to fill the three slots?
But the point is that students should get a seat inside. Then again despite the eventual NKC exit the shenanigans of the SJA doesn't inspire confidence.
Expect a big reshuffle in the NUJS governing bodies anytime between May and September next year -- regardless of whether the TMC wins or not.
1. Knowledge Gathering and Processing: The KM team is responsible for sourcing the latest legal and regulatory updates and processing them in a way that can be shared with all firm members. The purpose here is to ensure that practicing lawyers remain updated on developments. This also builds the firm’s KM repository over time and makes research and drafting efficient in the longer run.
2. Designing courses for firm members: Almost all law firms of a certain size (and disposable resources) have internal courses for their lawyers, which sometimes also form a part of the lawyers’ KPIs. The KM team develops these courses and handles the actual training/ course delivery aspects also. This can also include sessions with external speakers.
3. Maintaining repository of firm drafts and docs: It is also common for the KM team to keep a record of all the drafts and documents prepared in the firm across all matters. This is done to ensure that the drafts and documents are available to other lawyers as reference, if and when needed in the future for other matters.
4. Cross functionality with BD and HR teams: KM and BD teams often work together on digital marketing initiatives (think knowledge focused posts, 3rd party publications, media quotes etc.) and other related aspects. KM also works with HR on preparing firm wide policies at times (though less often) and also has a role to play in appraisals (if your firm mandates KM contributions in your KPIs).
KM teams typically do not work on any transactions. Even if there are lawyers in the team, they do not practice and instead work on the things I mentioned above.
The role is a mix of research and administrative work - typically a 80:20 split between the two.
The pay is decent. KM associates usually get paid 20-30% less of what practicing associates make at the firm at the same PQE. Not a bad deal, specially considering the working hours are typically lesser (meaning overtime is usually not required on a daily basis).
As I said, the exact role differs from firm to firm. But if you’re someone who enjoys research/ want a role that is a mix of corporate and academia, this can be good opportunity for you.
Hope this helps!
The work primarily involves redlining documents, with occasional contract negotiations. There’s limited drafting exposure, and even less research work since most of the contracts are standardized.
I’m planning to move to a law firm setup within a year of experience. Would really appreciate some guidance on how to navigate that transition. I understand that I could possibly pitch myself to GC/TMT teams, but I have zero references in the industry.
From what I heard, the somebody who was working at axiom that time joined AZB as a partner and that intern was recommended by him or smthg like that.
i repeat
tipping is optional
But are there genuinely no practitioners who actually want someone knowledgeable to join their chambers?
Honestly, I feel that at least at the fresher level, there must be many advocates and seniors with years of solid practice and experience who would take on juniors simply to maintain workflow (even if they pay very little). Do they also only care about contacts? Does no one value merit and knowledge anymore?
It’s genuinely disturbing if this is how chamber recruitments are made. Let's take the example of Yuvraj Singh, he’s retired from cricket, but even after retirement, he’s coaching players like Shubman Gill and Abhishek Sharma, passing on his knowledge and expertise to the next generation. I know it’s not the perfect analogy, but it captures my point: there must be some good seniors and advocates who actually want juniors to learn, work hard, and develop discipline for the future of the fraternity, and in that case atleast they would be seeking merit based interviews? Or is even that is a fairly tale dream?
I’m not saying they do it out of affection or respect for their juniors. Regardless of how they treat them, their ultimate goal is to ensure that both they and their juniors get better at what they do.
If such advocates exist, and I believe they do, then the question raised by the OP becomes valid. The previous answers only focused on the “contacts” aspect, which may answer point 5, but there are other important points worth discussing.
Do no advocates or chambers conduct interviews to assess a candidate’s knowledge before taking them on? If not, that’s a really deplorable situation. In that case, the coming gen should genuinely flood in-house & law firms; at least there, recruitment is structured and somewhat merit-based, with a payment at which you can eat something everyday without thinking of maintaining budget till end of month.
And to be clear, I’m not saying it’s the senior’s job to teach anyone. This is a profession built on practice, and everyone has to develop their own skills and knowledge. But there surely must be some good chambers with enough work to give young individuals exposure when they’re just starting out in litigation. In such cases, the question raised by the OP remains perfectly valid.
Contacts are one-half of your practice. I used to think your calibre & acumen is the other half, but I'm not too sure of it; contacts are the other-half of your practice as well.
I have worked at someone's chamber and now have my independent practice for the last several years. There is no other answer to it, period. Hell, half of the questions asked in OP are inapplicable.
It sure is redundant to satisfy your ego by responding to your myopic view that someone’s insecurities would make them take some competitive exam.
Truly hoping that in your 60s, you won’t be going around telling everyone you once did well in CLAT. Hope you find an identity for yourself beyond your CLAT performance.
Panag & Babu
If you don't have connections: Even if you have those skills, they probably (No, certainly) won't hire you.
They rejected deserving people after 6-7 minutes of basic HR questions and hired a client's child from▮▮▮ ▮▮▮▮▮▮ and Top ▮▮▮▮▮▮▮▮▮ student. Truly ahead of the curve.......
25k is not a bad pay since you are a fresher and we are talking about pune. i have friends there who got paid around 7-10 k after around 6 months of "probation/free labour" period. they had joined a litigation law office.
https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/holdings-of-indian-politicians-coming-soon-on-perplexity-finance-says-ceo-aravind-srinivas-101761965323089-amp.html
How true is this claim? Can anyone say from personal experience?
Get a good criminal lawyer in Kathmandu who can help you.
Also, please apply for anticipatory bail if that is available under Nepal law.
About me: SA at T1 M&A practice, top 3 NLU grad.
Transport: cab
Tech: iPhone pro max, MacBook Air
Clothes: ArmaniX, Ralph, Lacoste
Watch: Datejust, speed master (resale)
Holidays: Maldives, SE Asia, Paris/Amsterdam
Going out once a week.
Hope to get some advice on upgrades needed once I’m in the PA league. What can in change/pickup? The Datejust set me back quite a bit so no prominent watch splurge any time soon.
Toodles.