We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Thanks
predominantly - disputes and GC
want our country also to be ruined like Bangladesh and Nepal. One of these politicians frequently travels abroad and meets anti-Indian figures, including those who support terrorism. He is reputedly very close to George Soros and has been receiving huge funds intended to destabilize our country over the past decade. "
https://x.com/LiveLawIndia/status/2080326332215665128/photo/1
The solution is simple. Get high GDP growth asap. Reduce taxes. Abolish bureaucracy. Improve ease of doing business. Privatise PSUs. This alone will solve most of the problems.
You people are either stupid or malicious to say that they fastened during sleeping hours. Obviously the fast was during office hours. 6 hours is not as easy as you think. Some people did not drink water. Maybe it sounds easy to you, but it was just a small, symbolic gesture of support, amidst the pressure of studies, moots etc.
What have you people down to support the movement? Or are all of you BJP supporters?
T1 lawyers are great at emails.
Perhaps even better at briefing notes.
And decent at passive aggressive negotiation.
Watch them stand before a court to see them shudder.
Considering majority of their clients have a big say in government policies aka having government support, they can't risk losing them and see their competitors/peers getting a share of their pie.
Wachtell must act, given that it is widely considered the world's best law firm.
https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/supreme-court-lawyers-recite-constitutions-preamble-seeking-justice-for-students-cjp-thanks-them-101784805678763-amp.html
https://www.ndtv.com/video/the-real-issue-is-lost-harish-salve-s-blunt-take-on-neet-protests-political-drama-1131130
Obviously, it is hard to argue that Britain is a model for democracy these days (no country should be having seven prime ministers in 10 years), but this kind of mentality that your comment displays is taking us in the direction of the opposite dangerous extreme: a personality cult. Therefore, please revise your ideas.
About four months ago I placed at a national essay writing competition RGNUL ran in collaboration with Dhir & Dhir Associates. The advertised prize was an internship at the firm. I am still waiting for it.
What I have done, roughly in order:
- emailed the firm's internship and careers inbox
- emailed HR
- messaged HR on LinkedIn
- emailed the responsible associate directly, short and polite
- called the firm and tried to get put through to the right person
- went back to the student coordinators at RGNUL who organised the competition
Response to nearly all of it: nothing. No dates, no confirmation, not even a rejection.
Eventually I connected with one of the partners and messaged them on Linkedin. To their credit they replied immediately and said an associate would call me that same day. They named the associate. No call came. At 5 PM I looked up the associate's number and called him myself. He picked up, said he would call back, and hung up.
He called at 8 PM and spent the call shouting at me for having contacted the partner. Not for getting anything wrong, just for escalating. I had already emailed him about this internship. I had emailed the careers inbox, HR, other associates and the RGNUL coordinators. Nobody took responsibility, which is exactly why I went to a partner, and the partner was the only person who actually replied. The associate then told me the firm only offers virtual internships and asked me to message him on WhatsApp. I did . This was about 2 weeks ago. Nothing concrete since.
So, four months in: no dates, no offer letter, and the only real interaction I have had with the firm was being shouted at for following up.
I am posting because prize internships are advertised as a genuine part of what you get for months of work on a submission. If the firm cannot or will not honour it, the organising college should say so upfront rather than leaving students chasing an inbox for a third of a year.
Has anyone else had a competition prize internship simply never materialise? Did putting it in writing to the college's committee get you anywhere, or is there any point escalating further?
SC:
- NA
Bom HC:
- Justice Revati Mohan Dere, LLM Cambridge (now CJ of Meghalaya)
Delhi HC:
- Justice Pratibha Singh, LLM, Cambridge
- Justice Prateek Jalan: LLB Cambridge, Bar at Law from London, LLM Michigan,
Cal HC:
- Justice Arijit Banerjee: LLB Cambridge, Bar at Law from London
- Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya, LLM Cambridge (now in Telangana)
- Justice Rajasekhar Mantha, LLM King's
- Justice Ravi Kapur, LLB Leeds, Bar at Law from London
- Justice Lapita Banerji, LLB Leeds, Bar at Law from London (now in Punjab)
Allahabad HC:
- Justice Siddharth Nandan, LLM Warwick
Could you shed some light on the CTC that may be expected (Fixed+ Variable) for a SA/MA role in the KCO IP team, if the move is from a Tier 1 IP to KCO?.
Moved back to my place and left the big city behind for good.
Happier for it.
I don't know which should be given priority
If what you say were true, by now the 'victimized' NLUs would have sued BCI - more so when this information is already in the public domain.
I am uncertain about the choice, that I should make— so I need some suggestions