We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
in house is different - you become a part of the company. While still a 'job' like a law firm, the only issue you'll have is you'd never earn as much as you would have if you were similarly successful in litigation.
2. I basically want to move to a company at some point.
3. What are the options for working in a company?
I also find the manner in which OP copy-pasted the entire email to be in extremely poor taste. If you have a problem with that MP or the Firm, just leave.
Secondly, many people put BD/CD, and don't attend office. It is the partners who are guilty of doing this more often. But the owner seems to be targeting the associates for this, and not his partners. Ignorance.
Thirdly, how can somebody target Mr. Ojha like this. Mr. Ojha works so diligently and has sweated for the firm. Ungrateful.
Fourthly, owner knows very well that senior partners won't follow this. But for the sake of writing, it has been mentioned everybody needs to follow this policy. Lame.
Fifthly, the direct consequence is non-entitlement of discretionary bonus. Even for other non-compliance like non-adherence to AI policy, WFH policy, not attending office parties, not filling time-sheets, and not filling appraisal forms on time etc, the discretionary bonus can go for a toss. So billing basically has no role. Unprofessional.
Sixthly, the senior-most female partner (who is also part owner) neither comes to office nor will follow this policy. Nepotism.
(PS: Owner thinks that if deal announcements will have names of associates, then other firms/companies will poach them. Other firms will only poach from owner's firm and not from CAM/SAM/AZB/Trilegal/Khaitan, just because the owner believes so.)
Congratulations for getting published and trying to keep the fire alive. Unfortunately, a golden opportunity to take control of the narrative and nail NKC & Co has been squandered. The focus unfortunately is on the slippery SH order of SC, which may get modified in near future. More importantly, this article yet again failed to produce documented instances of financial wrongdoing by NKC and his cronies. Glaringly, the SJA leadership is missing from the entire exercise. Contrast this with SJA ownership of student protests leading to the ouster of PIB. Just search YT for NUJS Nite videos from 2016 onwards or slightly earlier. PIB and his gang were well entrenched and yet it was common knowledge to rank and file of NUJS officialdom that the mere whisper of SJA brass, esp a certain Prez (who began early as CR) would cause PIB and his campus friends scoot. Ask the PA (assuming honest answers will be given). All this without any violence and farcical gheraos. At no point SJA had the numbers that came this time to secure it's objectives. But they succeeded, incrementally, to get the damning documentation. They chiseled down the cabal (to the extent they could) with univ own documents.
The 47 demands remain unknown to the world and potential allies. The allegations remain unsubstantiated. The VC keeps playing victim without any effective counter. There is no answer on how the complicit SJA got summarily fobbed off and maybe rightly so due to lack of persuasive documentation. And lastly, the faculty members who goaded the students to aimlessly protest continue making us fools with greater audacity. Then again with friends such as SJA who needs...
Source:- https://www.shiksha.com/accounting-commerce/articles/icsi-cs-pass-percentage-for-cs-executive-and-cs-professional-blogId-109727
Most senior exits are able to take their entire team with them but his team is not moving. Even IK took his full team from SAM to JSA.
Hostel facilities, especially for girls, are abysmal. “Washrooms were under renovation for an entire month while we had to use them. It was horrible. Female students couldn’t access the washrooms when workers were present,” a student said.
“Most projectors, plug points don’t work. Air conditioners break down every two months, and every single classroom has water damage,” the leader said.
Classroom conditions have become hazardous with widespread water seepage, malfunctioning equipment, and exposed electrical wiring during the monsoon. “There is a lot of seepage in the classrooms, and it worsens when it rains. They get flooded, and it’s not safe,” a student said.
Complaining about unhygienic conditions on campus, one student said: “There were snakes roaming around”. Girls in a separate hostel had to get food delivered inside because they were afraid to step out.
Students report multiple injuries from slips and falls, including one where a student suffered spinal damage. “We’ve had disabled students fall down… people on crutches. It’s that bad,” one student said.
After months of inaction, students took matters into their own hands. They purchased and installed anti-slip mats throughout the campus.
https://news.careers360.com/nujs-protest-student-vice-chancellor-vc-resign-kolkata-sex-harassment-campus-infrastructure-law-courses-elective-faculty-cag-audit
https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/trump-announces-100-tariff-on-pharma-products-indian-drugmakers-likely-to-be-hit-101758843833346-amp.html
25L (4 PQE) - AM
32L (6 PQE) - M
40L (8 PQE) - SM
52L (11 PQE) - AD
1.25 CR + Stock options ( 15 PQE) - VP (head legal)
Morgan Stanley Derivatives - 15L (4 PQE)
HP - 15L (3 PQE)
Amazon - 42L (3 PQE)
Google - 80L (6 PQE)
Crypto Industry - 25L (4 PQE)
Fintech (Groww, Zerodha, Razorpay etc.) - 30L (4 PQE)
Funds - 20L (4 PQE)