We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Can anyone clarify why the Court decide to do this? Thanks.
NLUs now: ๐ฅด
https://x.com/gautambhatia88/status/2092916975500763506
Campus Infrastructure and Basic Amenities Protests: Students staged aggressive on-campus protests over long-standing issues like severe water shortages, power fluctuations, and failing hostel infrastructure.
Administrative and Policy Backlash: Tensions erupted between the student body and the administration regarding rigid, unforgiving attendance rules resulting in year-backs, steep cuts to activity funding, and a mass resignation of student representatives.
Expansion and Batch-Size Debates: The rollout of the alternative 3-year LLB program and regular BA program alongside the flagship 5-year B.A. LL.B. course, coupled with significantly scaled-up overall incoming batch sizes, fueled continuous debates over internal equity, campus crowding, and mounting placement pressures.
Its downhill journey has well and truly caught pace.
https://www.legallyindia.com/convos/topic/494321-the-debacle-of-nls-increased-batch-sizes
The convocation fiasco adds to the list of reasons why NLS should never be nationalized.
I agree with the post above. The contrast is so visible. On the same day, NFSU School of Law declares the IDDRC operational (led by Justice Dave), inaugurated by the CJI earlier in February 2026. This is a great milestone for the NFSU School of Law in creating this national asset for India, while NLS is busy with such petty and narrow-minded affairs.
A good analogy would be what Mamata did to the Tatas by opposing their coming to WB (for frivolous reasons) and the consequences it has faced since then on the state's investment climate.
Until we get a reliable confirmation that such a meeting happened, this report should be treated as FAKE NEWS.
https://www.thenewsminute.com/karnataka/why-was-nlsiu-convocation-cancelled-a-meeting-with-the-cji-followed-by-a-demand-students-rejected
However I believe the people/associates within the office are nice and mind their own business but yah they donโt care to ensure that interns get meaningful work apart from the lit team.
P.s. Note to foodies, no dinner is served or even covered in the entry charges. The name is a misnomer.
Nevertheless, it seems futile to blame batch size increase in lack of employment opportunities. The students who got into NLS would otherwise would have been in NALSAR/NUJS/etc. They are still the same bright students. The larger problem is concentration of Indian corporate legal market in the hands of a few large firms. If the legal market is to grow, more and more partners would have to break away and start their own botique firms (there are already some who pay around 1LPM which is good enough launching platform to grow). This will ensure that even lower ranked students from good law school get placed.
The second problem is people wagering all their bets in corporate placements, that too in tier 1 law firms. There is more to law than M&A at one of the LALA firms. I am not asking you to give up everything and start doing legal aid work, but if you know your batch rank is not good enough for a t1 law firm - diversify to a smaller firm which may pay 80k-1LPM to freshers, but atleast you will have a job. I wont name any places, but a person motivated enough can hustle through and easily find them.
Welfarism and populism always means more seats.
At the start of this decade, NLS would have a double digit batch size, and along with NALSAR, NUJS and NLUD, the graduating batch would be ~400. Now, the incoming batches at BA LLB in NLS themselves have 400 students+ 60 at LLB. 135 at NALSAR. 130+60 at NUJS. And some 80 at NLUD. You would have close to 900 students only from the top 4 law schools lol.
It's terrifying to think what would happen to the batches of 28 and 29 in the near future. The law firm job market gets worse each year, and does not show absolutely any sign of recovery any time soon, at least not in this decade. I don't want to get into specific numbers, but NLS has 2/3 of its batch unplaced. NALSAR and NUJS around half. A significant part of this includes really deserving candidates, with good profiles, who have nothing to blame on themselves. You spend lakhs and lakhs behind an elite degree after clearing a competitive exam, go through 5 years of law school only to graduate unemployed. I don't think rankers have to ever had struggle so much.
Law is not a basic graduation degree like a bachelor's in humanities. When you treat it as one, mindlessly expand your intake without any regard for the potential future of your students, you eventually do face the brunt. Competition keeps getting fiercer, and opportunities keep getting scarcer. So congratulations NLS, you've managed to keep a huge bunch of yourselves, as well as others, unemployed.
And honestly there are family disputes, property disputes among family thatโs get sorted with peace.
Though batch size of gnlu was almost double but let's seeeeee
Don't hold your achievements nluj and gnlu peeps, tell us who won this yearrrrr
i hope you are well! best of luck with everything ahead in your life. if you need any help/support, please reach out. i am sure many of us on this forum would be more than happy to help.
NALSAR and NLUJ : 10/10
NLSIU : 9.5/10
NLUD, WBNUJS : 8.5
SLSP : 8
other NLUs : 7.5
JGLS : 7
Sr. Adv. / Counsel - Gaurav Pachnanda, Gourab Banerji, Nakul Dewan, Rishab Gupta, Vyapak Desai. While these names are known when it comes to arbitration, you can also consider chambers which do a mix of arb and commercial litigation - Darius Khambata, Zubin Behramkamdin, Zal Andhurjiya, Ritin Rai, Amit Sibal, and I'm sure you'll find other LI threads which mention more such chambers
About potential and saturation, ngl lot of people claim to specialise in arbitration on linkedin nowadays so the field is saturated in terms of the volume of people trying to break into it vs. the number of meaningful opportunities. But arbitration is obviously expected to grow even more in the coming years, and there is no denying that quality lparcatocers would be needed in future. And understand this, no matter what specialisation you choose, the top is always vacant. You beat competition by authenticity. You you are not seeing it as a linkedin buzzword and really enjoy it, it should not be difficult for you to break in. You're from a T1 NLU, leverage that well. Take up relevant co-curriculars. Don't let anyone discourage you. Work hard and i'm sure you'll reach great heights. All the best!
You can try at Sama ODR if you are really interested.
They are doing quite good.
As for the dress, very commonly worn these days by trendy youth. Go to any metro city, or an upscale college like Jindal and Ashoka. Itโs very standard dress.
Big fuss over nothing.
But I'd really like to know how accurate this report is. I myself use Claude, but have to double check everytime it generates a draft for accuracy.
Would you recommend a 1 person team to evaluate some of these platforms?
CGPA matters without rationale.
But if you want absolutely no ifs and buts about it, a comfortable spot is above 7.5 (8 is arbitrary). And yes, gaining a +/- 1 CGPA score in the next 2-3 years can happen. Happened with me.
Go on: show me the verified, authoritative statistics demonstrating that Indian law firm partners are not as I describe. Do that.
The whole world knows this.
Constant performative conversations are insufferable.
What is the hiring scene though
(tier-1 grad too - if there's anything 'tier-1' about that college)
if this is not true - i hate big law
I've been told that I can work in a field that's an intersection of law and the creative field. I've been told that I can try HR or Marketing.
I have no one to seek guidance from, no one who could get what I'm going through. I'd really REALLY appreciate some advice from you all. thank you!
เคฏเฅเคเคจเฅเคจเฅเคธเคพเคฐ, เคธเฅเคนเฅเคฒ เคธเคฐเคฒเคพ เคตเคฟเคเคพเคฐเคพเคฏเคเฅ เคเคนเฅ เคเฅ เคคเฅ เคเคฎเคเฅเคฏเคพเคฌเคฐเฅเคฌเคฐ เคเคพเคฏ เคเคฐเคฃเคพเคฐ เคเคนเฅ. เคเคชเคฒเฅเคฏเคพเคฒเคพ เคเคฐ เคจเฅเคเคฐเฅเคฎเคงเฅเคจ เคฌเคพเคนเฅเคฐ เคเคพเคขเคพเคฏเคเฅ เค เคธเฅเคฒ, เคคเคฐ เคเคคเคพเค เคนเฅ เคฎเคพเคนเคฟเคคเฅ เค เคธเคพเคฏเคฒเคพ เคนเคตเฅ เคเคฃเคฟ เคเคชเคฒเฅเคฏเคพเคฒเคพ เคฏเฅเคเฅเคฏ เคตเฅเคเคณเฅ เคนเฅเคฃเฅเคฏเคพเคเฅ เคชเฅ เคเฅเค เคฆเคฟเคฒเฅ เคเคพเคตเฅ. เคฆเฅเคจ เคฎเคนเคฟเคจเฅเคฏเคพเคเคเฅเคฏเคพ เคจเฅเคเฅเคธเคธเคน เคเคชเคฒเฅเคฏเคพเคฒเคพ เคเค เคเค เคเคฐเฅเคจ เคฌเคพเคนเฅเคฐ เคซเฅเคเคคเคพ เคฏเฅเคฃเคพเคฐ เคจเคพเคนเฅ.
เคเคชเคฃ เคเคเคคเฅเคฐ เคเคญเฅ เคฐเคพเคนเคฟเคฒเฅ เคจเคพเคนเฅ เคคเคฐ, เคเคฎเฅเคนเคพเคฒเคพ เคตเฅเคเคตเฅเคเคณเค เคฎเคพเคฐเคฒเค เคเคพเคเคฒ.
เคเคชเคฃ เคชเฅเคขเฅเคฒ เคเค เคตเคกเฅเคฏเคพเคค เคจเคฟเคฐเฅเคฃเคฏเคพเคตเคฐ เคชเฅเคนเฅเคเคฒเฅ เคคเคฐเฅ, เคเคชเคฃ HR เคเฅเคฏเคพ เคธเคฆเคธเฅเคฏเคพเคเคจเคพ เคฎเคพเคนเคฟเคคเฅ เคฆเฅเค เคเคฃเคฟ เคคเฅ เคเคฎเคเฅเคฏเคพเคธเฅเคฌเคค เคธเคพเคฎเฅเคฒ เคนเฅเคฃเฅเคฏเคพเคธ เคธเฅเคตเคพเคเคค เคเคนเฅ. เคเคฐ Suhail เคธเคฐ เคเคฎเคเฅเคฏเคพ เคตเคพเคเคตเฅ เคฎเคพเคเคฃเฅเคฏเคพเคเคถเฅ เคธเคนเคฎเคค เคจเคธเคคเฅเคฒ, เคคเคฐ เคเคชเคฒเฅเคฏเคพเคฒเคพ เคธเคฐเฅเคตเคพเคเคจเฅ เคเคเคพเค เคตเฅเคณเฅ เคเคพเคฎ เคฅเคพเคเคฌเคตเคพเคฏเคฒเคพ เคนเคตเฅ. เคเคฟเคเคตเคพ เคเคฆเคพเคเคฟเคค เคเคเคพ เคตเฅเคเคณเฅเคฏเคพ เคเคพเคฏเคฆเฅเคถเฅเคฐ เคซเคฐเฅเคฎเคฎเคงเฅเคฏเฅ เคฎเฅเค เฅเคฏเคพ เคชเฅเคฐเคฎเคพเคฃเคพเคค เคธเคพเคฎเฅเคฒ เคตเฅเคนเคพเคตเฅ.
เคเคพเคนเฅ เคตเคเฅเคฒ เคชเฅเคขเฅเคฒ เคฎเคนเคฟเคจเฅเคฏเคพเคค เคนเฅเคฃเคพเคฑเฅเคฏเคพ เฅจเฅซเคตเฅเคฏเคพ เคตเคฐเฅเคงเคพเคชเคจเคฆเคฟเคจเคพเคเฅเคฏเคพ เคธเคพเคเคฐเฅเคเคฐเคฃเคพเคเคพ เคฌเคนเคฟเคทเฅเคเคพเคฐ เคเคฐเคฃเฅเคฏเคพเคเฅ เคฏเฅเคเคจเคพ เคเคฐเคค เคเคนเฅเคค เคเคฐ เคคเฅเคฏเคพเคเคจเคพ เคคเฅเคตเฅเคนเคพ เคคเคฐเฅ เคธเฅเคชเคทเฅเคเคคเคพ เคฎเคฟเคณเคพเคฒเฅ เคจเคพเคนเฅ. เคเคฆเคพเคเคฟเคค เคเคชเคฒเฅเคฏเคพเคฒเคพเคนเฅ เคคเฅเคฏเคพเคเคเฅเคฏเคพเคค เคธเคพเคฎเฅเคฒ เคตเฅเคนเคพเคฏเคเค เคเคพ?