We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
I think Mumbai and Pune should be designated as union territories and governed by the army. Too important to be left in the hands of uneducated goonda politicians.
All of the BA LLB's top rankers knew they had pretty much confirmed spots at T-1s on Day-0, and that the RCC rules meant that if selected by NDA they would be unable to participate at Day-0. As such, pretty much no one with a decently high rank applied to NDA from the BALLBs while the LLB's had a lot of top rankers apply.
As such, this idea that firm's prefer the 3 Year LLB's is misguided because a large chunk of the BA LLB's just didn't apply to NDA. But regardless, This stupid internal fighting is clearly being brought up by someone who either 1. Not a student here or 2. a junior who hasn't sat for day 0. And if they spent half as much time studying than they did engaging in this, maybe they'd have a career to worry about instead of this.
Any Brother Printer which is a laserjet with a scanner should do you fine. Especially one with an autofeeder. Brother DCP L something something is what I have. Do not get inkjet or and other nonsense, get a laserjet, mine has been working like a charm for the last 3 years.
Or is it that no firms appear there?
TLDR:
- VC instituting a biometric attendance for faculty. Will allow monitoring of how much time professors are spending on campus.
- One faction is protesting this. They say colleges abroad don't have it and most in India don't have it. A university professor is not like a 9-to-5 Jindal Steel employee. All that matters is taking classes regularly, meeting students who want private appointments and publishing papers. Research can also be done from home. Pay cannot be linked to time physically spent on campus. Also, attendance can be checked through non-biometric systems.
- Another faction is pledging loyalty to Naveen Jindal and the VC. They support the introduction of corporate practices in academia. They agree that corporate concepts like efficiency and productivity, pay linked to time on campus etc should be introduced in academia. They agree that WFH is not productive. Biometric attendance is more accurate and reliable than other types of attendance.
- The split in faculty in broadly along ideological lines. Left-wing profs are against it, right-wing profs favour it. Most of the left-wing profs were hired when Naveen Jindal was part of the Congress and the university had a left-wing tilt. Whereas most of the right-wing profs are recent hires, after Naveen Jindal joined the BJP and the VC has taken a full pro-BJP tilt.
- The LW faction is apprehensive about whether they will be targeted through this system.
The classes at MNLU can often end at 3:30-4 as well, so the "Mumbai advantage" is only a thing if you don't manage to land a PPO in your normal session breaks. People use the internship allowances (a month per semester/year, I believe now), and in the final semester, they intern like crazy to land jobs/explore opportunities.
Both aspects are true, but if you grind enough at Jindal, you would be in a good place to get a good job (both corp and non-corp).
However, the decision is up to you, and the NLU tag does matter during your student life and post-graduation. MNLU would even help if you wish to go for an MBA (IIM's, ISB, SP Jain and so on). There are some top MBA admits from MNLU as well (IIM K, ISB, among others).
I am currently practising at P&H High Court.
I want to switch to corporate law practise.
(May be a law firm or in house legal team).
How to begin?
Reason for switch is personal(family related).
I'm preparing for CLAT PG 2026 and aiming for a Tier-1 NLU for my LL.M. I'm considering buying the LegalEdge After College Premium Test Series (TopRankers), which includes:
50 full-length mocks for CLAT PG & AILET PG
Study material via E-Reader (non-downloadable, accessible till 31st Dec 2025)
1000+ curated case law summaries (2021โ2025)
PYPs for CLAT PG, AILET PG, CUET PG
I don't have time to watch live lectures or videos โ I prefer in-depth reading and mock practice. So, I have a few questions:
1. Is the study material deep and reliable enough to help crack CLAT PG with a good score?
2. Is the E-Reader interface smooth on MacBook? Can we highlight, annotate like in a PDF reader?
3. Are the mocks at the real CLAT PG difficulty level โ especially the passage-based pattern?
4. Any experiences from aspirants who cracked or scored well using only this course?
Your guidance or honest reviews would be really helpful before I invest. Thank you in advance ๐
So I unfortunately see Lala LLP outlasting Argus and buying them up
The issue is lack of vacancy.
As for OP: Learning curve is steep, much like at any seasoned senior's office. Best to approach such places after 2-3 years of consolidation at Trial/HC.
Litigation in India is, by design, an individual-driven profession. Youโre not truly a litigator until you have your own clients and an independent practice. Lawyers working in litigation officesโwhether chambers or law firmsโare, in effect, apprentices. Itโs unquestionably wrong that theyโre expected to work without fair compensation, but that remains the harsh reality of our time.
Corporate law firms have failed miserably at disrupting this cultureโlargely because they account for less than 1% of the work flowing into the courts.
Enrolment is fine, but AIBE would be needed. But Association membership on payment of chanda is certainly not needed to practice law.
GNLU Ends with 39 PPOs.
Lets see the score on Day Z
Reasons:
-Perceived favoritism toward certain associates by partners.
-Limited direct exposure or interaction with partners early on, making it hard for new hires to understand core leadership expectations.
-Coordination gaps across functionsโunclear processes and point-of-contact confusion during their initial weeks
-Limited HR bandwidth โ New hires frequently encounter confusion over basic administrative matters.
-Lack of formal mentoring or senior guidanceโwithout structured mentorship, new colleagues felt unsupported in navigating internal norms.
-Internal politics within associate pool makes life of few associate very difficult.
Jhana is one which is slightly better in terms of accuracy but privacy issues โ ๏ธ
However, thereโs one named Lexplor- theyโre great on accuracy and privacy front, specifically for litigating lawyers. They have free plans as well.
https://www.news18.com/india/supreme-court-raps-rahul-gandhi-over-chinese-occupation-claim-if-youre-true-indian-wouldnt-say-this-9482685.html
Others that pay well (but again, difficult to find vacancy):
Sidharth Luthra
Vikas Singh
Aryaman Sundaram
Siddharth Aggarwal
Absolutely valid to ask why Mumbai should not be much cheaper than Dallas. Make sense to everyone except blind bhakts convinced that India is a superpower.
Thanks.
Paradox