We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
AZB- 4
S&R- 2
Tri- 1
Panag and Babu - 2
IC RegFin - 1
+1 at Jurisphere
= "I am from an allegedly good college in Mumbai with a good CV, but my college is not an NLU"
If the big day doesn't work for you, take NLSAT and try to get into NLS. Otherwise, go for litigation for now.
Perhaps try to get some information by asking an indirect confirmation like: โWhen will I approximately get to know regarding further joining details?โ or โWill I be directly joining (X) Partnerโs team itself?โ to gauge the current status of the PPO if you can.
Hang in there though!
1. Considering you have written proofs too, you shouldn't be worried at all. Did you try showing said proofs to the HR? Call the HR everyday and ask him/her to connect you with the partner or to give you clarity about your situation. Maybe try connecting with the associates in the team you worked with? In case you were able to make a good rapport with one of them, speak to them and ask them if there is any reason why the partner has suddenly ghosted you.
2. If none of this is working out, fuck the firm. Talk to your RCC or your faculty in charge for the placement committee, explain to them your situation and persuade them to let you sit for the placements. You are in T1 NLU so you are obviously smart and have the goodwill of your college name too. I am sure the RCC will let you sit for exceptional circumstances, this isn't a situation where you are at fault.
3. Worst case scenario, none of this works out, reach out to your alumni, explain the situation without naming or dissing the firm/partner and try and bag an assessment internship. Again a T1 NLU tag will definitely help your case. 2026 is still far away, you still have the chance to secure a placement with/without your college RCC helping you.
Just don't lose hope, good luck!
Now coming to Gopal SanksโLOL, comparing him to the Sibal Bros is apples and orangutans. The Sibals are swimming in the big-money stuffโcommercial disputes, fat arbitration gigs, courtroom drama with corporate stakes. Thatโs not the SCโs usual vibe, btw. The Supreme Court is more into the aam janta spaceโpublic interest, policy, constitutional questions- and, yes - the occasional commercial appeal. Not where the money flows, but easier to enter if youโve got, like, half a brain, a decent handle on English, and the holy trinity: unpaid work, a sponsor, and most criticallyโa GURU. Your ticket to the club is referrals, baby.
Gopal didnโt come from crorepati cash, but letโs not kid ourselvesโhe had elite privilege. Bureaucrat dad. KKV as his legal godfather. What he did have was serious driveโand he ran with it. That combo? Lethal. And thatโs why heโs where he is.
If anything both Akhil and Amit Sibal are doing both hardcore commercial matters before all Courts and Tribunals, and are probably earning more than GS.
PS - Earning more or working exclusively in the Supreme Court is no measure of success. My point is both GS and the Sibal brothers are doing well and are on similar levels - one can't compare
IYKYK.
NB: To be clear about definitions, "[passing] CLAT" = "admission into T1 NLU", nothing more, nothing less.
My seniors, including the partner I was working under, are nice people. I think thatโs why, it feels worse disappointing them everytime. Moreover, I have been working hard, staying late in the office to get work done. However, that hasnโt helped me deliver a decent work product. As a result, I think, I havenโt been getting as much work either in the past week.
A few weeks ago, I thought I was getting a hang of everything and I was getting a lot of work, but now I donโt know how to proceed. A major part of me now thinks that this profession, because of itโs requirement to attention to detail, isnโt for me. I donโt even understand where my concentration goes or/and how I end up making an error. Also, I donโt feel like working, because I know that even with my best efforts, I am going to deliver a substandard work product. Even so, I like law and transactions in general. Part of me wants to be in the profession for whatever reason.
I need guidance as to how to proceed. I saw another post here on making a checklist. What should the checklist consist of? Is there anything else I can do to help myself? I am trying to take my work slow, but even then, I catch some things amiss on a re-read when the document has been sent out. After that, my morale reaches a low point and I donโt feel like working all over again. Because of this, I have been feeling very anxious as well, which was not a problem as much even when I was burdened with a lot of work.
Your comment would make a lot of sense in the year 2000. Today, things have changed. A generalist law degree (like a BA-LLB) followed by an LLM in a special area would make sense. Today, that differentiation is happening at the UG level itself. There is a reason why questions are being raised about having generalist civil service officers versus specialist ones. The need and demand for specialist roles are rising.
At the current moment, all top law colleges are managed and led by those who are products of the traditional BA-LLB-oriented thinking and approach; hence, they will resist change. For real transformation to happen, the current crop has to retire, and new law schools that are not bound by archaic thinking have to crop up. It is happening, and they are NOT going to be the state NLUs. Let's talk after 10 years. Sure. By then, it will be embarrassing to even say that one holds a BA-LLB degree.
Wow. ๐ณ๐ณ๐ณ
1. Itโs MUNDANE - the human brain has finite capacity for focussed work. If something is boring it makes is 10x harder to do it with a sleep deficit, under pressure and in a reasonable time frame.
2. The offer document is templated but the diligence that goes into it is not. Think of the DRHP as a really long complicated form that you need to fill for opening a bank account.
https://www.news18.com/explainers/clothes-jewellery-scotch-how-india-uk-fta-will-bring-cheers-to-these-sectors-ws-dl-9457641.html
What should I choose in the long run? Can I switch from Banking and Finance to M&A and PE/VC later? Is such a transition possible? Is the work at least relatively familiar? Will people in the other teams consider my Banking and Finance experience equivalent, or even slightly lesser, but still relevant?
Another factor is that, because of the concentration of opportunities, almost everyone in my batch is applying for M&A and PE/VC roles. As a result, there donโt seem to be as many openings across firms. In contrast, since fewer people apply to Banking and Finance, the few roles that do exist seem more accessible, provided you meet their expectations. Is that a fair observation?
Ultimately, I know I cannot live in Mumbai long-term. Are there any Banking and Finance teams outside Mumbai, particularly in Bangalore or Hyderabad, that are growing and offer decent quality of work and pay? Or is it more realistic to eventually move to a Transactions team (M&A/PE-VC) in one of those cities?