Becoming clear now that it’s the Justice Varma issue.

https://www.news18.com/india/jagdeep-dhankhar-accepted-oppns-notice-on-justice-varmas-removal-govt-not-informed-sources-9456642.html

200% he was asked to leave by Modi because he accepted the motion against Varma from the opposition, instead of letting the government introduce it. Modi gave an official response many hours later and it was very curt. He said:

"Shri Jagdeep Dhankhar Ji has got many opportunities to serve our country in various capacities, including as the Vice President of India. Wishing him good health."

What kind of response is that?

https://x.com/narendramodi/status/1947548037271724226

I’d take Rajdeep’s views with a pinch of salt, as his wife is a TMC MP and Rajdeep is known to be pro-opposition. Also, there is absolutely nothing to suggest that Dhankar and Modi disagree on the NJAC. In fact, Dhankar has been blasting the judiciary.

Other theories on social media (claiming to quote credible sources) are saying DYC or Tharoor will take over, possibly Gogoi too. Else it will be linked to the cabinet reshuffle. Rajnath or Tax Tai maybe. Or Nadda.

My own prediction is that it will be Tax Tai and Sanjeev Sanyal will be the new FM. Big Bang reforms on the cards.

This happened to me many years ago. It is too late but next time make sure you have a signed offer letter (on paper) with a partner signing. Ask your RCC. Mine allowed me to enter recruitment late. Then the firm panicked and called me and I told them I will withdraw from interviews with other firms if I get a signed offer letter from them and I got one.

He works under Harsh Maggon and enough has been said about the man on this platform. The team rewards hard workers with more work and more money and more stress since mid-levels ▮▮▮. They do headliner deals and have cream clients - so if you are chasing fame, it is the right platform else look beyond. Best of luck!

Who stopped you from getting those courses exactly? There are hundreds of opportunities available on the Internet, including free ones. It isn't someone else's fault that you went for something looking for something else! Many of the expert IP lawyers in the country don't have a science background, it isn't stopping them from being good at their job.

Beneficiary of Capitalism here, with a lot of experience in "tech and finance".

The idea that you can swap a BA for a BBA or BSc and produce better lawyers is one of the worst takes I have seen here (and I have seen many, from 18-25 year old kids).

The purpose of a law school is not to prepare everyone for a corporate law career. The purpose of a law school is to do just that- teach you the law, and then you decide whether to go into litigation, policy, journalism, academia, or into a corporate law career. The humanities are an integral component of this, because they give you a solid base from which you can pursue multiple options. If you get a BBA or a BSc, you are already limiting your options.

"How will studying Marx, Romila Thapar and Ambedkar equip law students"?

Are you for real? Let's assume for a second that you don't think law school is meant to produce litigators, journalists and commentators, academicians or policy professionals. Let's assume you only want to focus on crypto and "complex, technocratic finance".

Tomorrow, the government will release a draft framework and ask for comments. Or maybe you will get invited to a conference for your thoughts on the new law.

But you don't know how to critically analyze laws, beyond a very superficial level. You haven't studied Marx, and his theories of how laws favour the powerful and entrenched. You haven't studied Romila Thapar, so you don't know how to push back against conventional wisdom. You haven't studied Ambedkar (lol), so you don't know how legal systems are built to accommodate conflicting interests. Eventually, no one wants to listen to you, because you sound like a 22 year old.

That's still OK. As and when it goes to court, and some annoying left wing intellectuals oppose great corporate expansion plans by citing Marx and Ambedkar, you can always hire a senior counsel to counter their positions on Marx and Ambedkar.

Oops. The senior counsels have studied BBA LLB, and have no clue what the other side is talking about. They don't understand why it's a bad thing to use eminent domain, displace people, pay them "fair compensation", and mine rare earths.

That's also OK. You've studied BBA and BSc. You're now an expert in Entrepreneurship, Marketing, Human Capital, PR and Crisis Management, and Economics (back to Marx again). If you did BSc, you now know Physics, Maths and Chemistry. You can combine your knowledge of Thermodynamics and Advanced Algebra with Law, to become a better lawyer.

But you've studied Accounting! Maybe you can replace PWC, because why do you need auditors when you have a lawyer with a BBA? You've studied maths, so you know how to solve cryptographic puzzles and mine your own crypto. You excitedly go to all the top crypto lawyers, but all of them have a BA LLB, understand crypto very well, and are not interested in your technical details.

Thankfully, all the top law colleges in this country don't feel the need to fix what has worked very well so far. Go ahead and downvote this all you want, but come back to this comment in 10 years, and lets talk.

Google is your friend. Alternately reach out to seniors. If that’s not possible reach out to a number of recently admitted folk on LinkedIn. People are usually happy to pay it forward and give you advice. Forums like this are not usually the place. And you don’t know the person giving advice and the person giving advice has no incentive to be very thorough or helpful because they don’t know if you’re a first year who is day dreaming and wasting their time or if you’re actually serious. They also won’t be able to tailor advice to your profile.

Hi all,

I’m planning to pursue an LLM abroad and I’m looking for advice specifically on Scholarships:

- What are the top scholarships available for Indian students pursuing LLMs abroad? (e.g. Chevening, Fulbright, DAAD, Inlaks, JN Tata, etc.) : UK & Singapore
- Any insights on how competitive they are and what makes a strong application?
- Are there any university-specific or lesser-known scholarships worth applying for?

Would be super grateful for any guidance, suggestions, or even links to past threads. Thanks in advance!

Incorrect and myopic view. The thumb rule is that the quality of the activity on LinkedIn may (but not must) be an indication of the quality and quantity at work. I understand that it is a norm to disparage lawyers who are active on LinkedIn - it would be helpful if the tide shifted to assessing the quality of their posts, rather than just the quantity.

Are Gurcaran's posts the best in the game? Probably not (on a global scale, not at the Indian level - at the Indian level, he's doing very well for a self-starter). Are they interesting enough and error-free to function as a simple means to get his firm's name out and hopefully transform into prospective work? Probably yes.

Forgive my combative comment, but you, unkind Sir, are the classic case of a Kupamanduka. Rise above this petty attitude and let a man earn his living and do good work. There are many more expletives that I would like to direct your way, but that would not be helpful to anyone.

I haven't spoken with Guracaran in a few months, but I have known him since before law school, through law school, while he was at CAM, and after he started his outfit. It's a small outfit with ambitions to grow and do good work. I have seen Gurcaran take on a wide variety of work, and his legal acumen is sound and continues to grow. Super at networking, management, and client service - skills that many Indian lawyers desperately need to develop.

This is not at Gurcaran's request, and I would understand if people assume it is/ or typed by him - I do not care. However, it's not enjoyable to witness unnecessary commentary from people who haven't worked with the individual, and I felt obliged to speak out.

To the original poster - as I said, it's no CAM and is a small outfit, but an ex-CAM SA runs it. If you want to work at a small place, consider interning and giving it a shot - no other way to figure out the mettle of a new, small firm.

My sister has applied in NFSU for LLB (Hons.) she has been selected for the counselling which would be happening soon. Unfortunatley we are not financially very sound and she dint get the EWS on time while applying for the exam.

Is there a way she can still get fee waiver seat using the EWS (which she has got now).
What are other financial-aid options or scholarships she can avail.

You made the same post on Reddit, and now you've posted it on Legally India. I stopped using Reddit because of people like you, and now you're here again. I understand that NLUs are shitty, but that doesn't mean I’ll go study at NFSU or BITS.

BITS offered me a 90% scholarship and I still didn’t go. That should tell you how bad their law program is. As for NFSU, I don’t know why anyone would want to study law at a forensics university.

1. Nigam, Registrar NLS

2. Sarasu Thomas, Prof NLS, Dean Manipal

3. Rahul singh, prof NLS

4. Mrinal Satish, prof NLS

5. Pritam Baruah, Nalsar, Dean Munjal

6. Faiz Tajuddin, prof jgls

7. Anup Surendranath, Nalsar,

8. Mathew John, prof jgls

9. Nenika jha, NUJS, Harvard, prof jgls

10. Saumya Uma , prof jgls

So many others…

Go CJI. 🫡

https://www.news18.com/india/woman-demands-rs-12-crore-bmw-house-in-mumbai-as-alimony-sc-asks-why-dont-you-earn-9455841.html

I worked for about 2.5 years at a supposedly “pan India” law firm, with the Managing Partner being an ex NALSAR.

I left the firm for good in the month of March and it has been around 3 months, with my last months salary, expenses not paid.

I have sent 50+ emails following up, number of messages and calls but to no respite. On one call with the MP, he abused me, threatened me that you’re working at XYZ, there’s an email pending for BVC.

Please suggest what should I do now.

Just noticed that, sorry for the mixup between the two in the post. I meant the vice versa.
Thanks for your advice. I can't opt for BSc LLB or Btech LLb because it just simply isn't offered in the college I'm getting. Even if that was the case, I wouldn't have chosen them as they both require tremendous efforts alone and would've distracted me from the law subjects.

LOL!

Tell me you're a self-absorbed narcissist without telling me you're a self-absorbed narcissist.

No T1 law firm or any other law firm in general owes you anything simply because you hail from a so-called top law institute.

Performance on an entrance exam nearly half a decade ago is no indicator of current academic prowess or professional skill.

You claim to have "demonstrated sustained effort to grow in this field" and yet, are unaware of the simple fact that the legal profession, like most other professions operates primarily on ones skills, experience & willingness to learn and NOT only on the pedigree of the college they study in.

Most of the best lawyers in this country (corporate and litigation) did not attend NLUs and have managed to do extremely well for themselves.

You do not know what kind of experience or skills these other candidates possess and you'd be better off not trying to make improper assumptions when the fact of the matter is that there are a LOT of students out there who manage to get relevant work experience, build meaningful relationships, AND secure top ranks in their college. The fact that you have not been able to do the same is not a shortcoming on their end but on yours.

While it is certainly alright to vent out frustrations, misplacing your anger in those who managed to secure limited, coveted internship spots is neither helpful not healthy.

Instead, try to improve your batch rank, and ensure that you show up to your next internship with a better and more humble attitude than the one you have put on display here.

The legal industry is all about CONNECTIONS and if you do somehow make it to a T1 firm, you might most likely find yourself in a situation where your colleagues/SAs/PAs/Partners or even Senior Partners belong to one of these so called "Tier 3 institutes" like Symbi or Christ. I'd hate to see you get humbled in a much more humiliating and public manner in such a situation.

Sincerely,

T1 Associate.

I interned at Trilegal Delhi during April 2025. I have heard a lot on LI that callbacks are particularly easy to bag at Trilegal. However, when I asked HR about status of my callback, I was told my feedback was not good enough to grant one.

Sad part is I have started my last year with no other good internship lined up. My mentor was mostly unavailable during the entire period to even assess me. I did my best yet this happened. Feeling sad and unsure about my career prospects.

Hello everyone & especially ones at NDA, I have an upcoming internship with their corp team at Mumbai, and I've heard that interns are not getting work or getting assessed in the team. Is the same true ? And are they giving ppos ? Considering their copious hirings from nlu day zeros for bo' 26 any chance they're giving ppos ?

Doing everything in one's power to elbow a person out of an organisation because a self-proclaimed "senior" partner felt threatened. Taking away all shared resources from a senior colleague who is hospitalised after s/he challenged the entrenched and absolutely incompetent "senior" partner. Writing petty, nasty and extremely personal comments on a work group (WA) on a Saturday because the "senior" partner made a fool of himself before the client who directly called him asking for an update. Constantly berating team members because he feels like it and he can. Acting out his extreme insecurity which perhaps is a result of his abysmal personal life, zero standing in the professional world, and complete lack of understanding of basic principles of the law he claims to practise.

Not every firm that parades as a tier 1 tech law practice is doing actual fintech. The real work - RBI heavy, commercially grounded, deal-tested - sits with the legacy Tier 1s. The rest? Mostly glorified MSAs dressed as fintech mandates.

Behind the LinkedIn polish, it’s chaos. Partners play brand manager, SAs sit confused, and juniors are left chasing research prompts on issues no one even understands. Mood swings substitute strategy. Screaming replaces clarity.

You’re not building a fintech team by micromanaging doc formatting and hovering over track changes. And definitely not by flirting your way through team dinners.

They are UAE, Qatar, Taiwan, Oman, Hong Kong, Singapore, Japan. China rank 15, India rank 66.

https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/this-european-nation-is-worlds-safest-country-check-indias-ranking-8923106/amp/1

I'll be entering into my third year of law school soon. Plan to join into corporate law but I've only done disputes internships as of yet. What are some ways in which I can enhance my knowledge on the commercial side of law? By that I mean knowing abt the business side of areas like M&A, PE/VC, Securities etc. I do read stuff uploaded on the Dealstreet of Bar and Bench, but I feel like that isn't enough. Any newspapers/websites/courses/blogs that could help me out in this?

These demarcations are indeed firm specific. TMT is a super wide umbrella that probably encompasses as much variety in practice as a term as "Corporate" would at this point.

Some places have a FinTech focused practice which would resemble a Banking & Finance team more. Some places have a GenCorp team with a TMT advisory tagged on that work mostly on transactions, consulting specifically on the tech side. Some are focused on Telecom mandates, which is its own can of worms. IP is generally separated from TMT at this point, but some firms still include it with some teams focusing fully on IP.

In terms of gaining experience, it depends on where you want to end up. If your aim is to master this specific domain, joining a fully advisory practice like Trilegal is probably your best shot. If you want to gain more varied experience and have the option to switch to another parallel vertical later on, joining something like SAM or CAM is a better idea.

The Supreme Court on Monday pulled up lawyer Mathews Nedumpara for referring to Justice Yashwant Varma of the Allahabad High Court by name, without the honorific 'Justice', while seeking an urgent hearing for a plea to register an FIR in a cash recovery case linked to the judge.

A bench comprising Chief Justice of India BR Gavai and Justice K Vinod Chandran expressed strong disapproval as Nedumpara repeatedly referred to the high court judge as 'Varma'.

"Is he your friend? He is still Justice Varma. How do you address him? Have some decorum. You are referring to a learned judge. He is still a judge of the court," the Chief Justice said.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

What a chad!!

https://www.indiatoday.in/amp/india/law-news/story/chief-justice-br-gavai-pulls-up-lawyer-for-calling-cash-row-judge-yashwant-varma-just-varma-is-he-your-friend-2758961-2025-07-21