We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Now, coming to your questions:
Yes, graduating at 35 does affect your chances of getting a corporate law job. Indian law firms are terrible places, and a team usually prefers a 23-25-year-old at the fresher level instead of a 35-year-old. As a lawyer, you do basic mind-numbing compliance work that requires a very little/basic understanding of tech. In-house roles might take your background more favourably than law firms, though.
Given your background, I would not suggest litigation; you will have to slog for at least 10 years, and I don't think that is possible at 35.
I am a bit curious tho, why did you not try for an MBA? Your experience would be incredibly valuable for an MBA role at a tech company.
I’d appreciate any insights or experiences from those who’ve navigated a similar path or know of others who have.
Background:
===========
- - I’ve secured admission to NLSIU’s 2025–28 cohort for the 3-Year LL.B. (Hons.) program.
- - I'm in my early 30s with 9+ years of experience in tech, AI, data, and digital/technical content — across both freelance and full-time corporate roles.
- - My background is in Computer Science and I have a Master’s in Data Science & AI.
- - I currently/used to work at a global tech firm in a remote role. My current compensation is roughly equivalent to what a top 10% NLS graduate might earn as a fresher in a Tier-1 Indian law firm.
=
=
The Dilemma:
============
- - I’ll be 35+ by the time I graduate.
- - I’m deeply interested in transitioning into corporate law, with a focus on Tier-1 Indian firms or tech-law/compliance niches — and potentially a future LL.M. + international role.
- - Given my background, I’m particularly drawn to areas like data protection, AI regulation, fintech law, and tech transactions.
=
=
My Questions:
=============
- - Is it realistic to aim for top corporate law roles at my age — either in India or through the LL.M. + international route?
- - Will law firms (or in-house roles) value my domain experience if I position myself in tech-facing legal areas?
- - Does being a late-30s graduate affect placement or growth in Indian corporate law firms?
- - Any success stories of people who made a mid-career switch through the 3-year LL.B. would be incredibly helpful.
- - I’m not currently considering litigation due to my age, financial urgency, and being a first-generation lawyer. But do let me know if you think there's a viable path I’m overlooking.
Would be grateful for any thoughts, guidance, or examples you can share. Thanks in advance!
GS was (when he was in active practice in SC) far better than Salve and Rohatgi. No comparison.
Later, the issue came up at the Karnataka High Court, during the NLSIU domicile reservation case. ASG Vikramjeet Banerjee (who is an NLSIU alum) appeared in the case. The argument NLSIU made (which was accepted by the court) is that only NLSIU is a national university, because Chief Justice of India is the chancellor. Others are state universities. But they conveniently forgot to mention is that some NLUs also have the CJI as Chancellor.
Juniors ofc are rude and ▮▮▮
- Unless you become a senior counsel, or become among the top 10% of equity law firm partners, you will simply not have the kind of life that people talk about in LI comments: flat in DLF Camellias, Lamborghini etc.
- Even a flat in a lesser gated community, or a less pricey car like a BMW, is not so easy.
- Further, many are financing such lifestyles through loans, because of peer pressure, FOMO etc.
- Many of the NLSIU alumni who are celebrated as star counsels are actually nepo kids. They would have succeeded even if they went to Amity. Every single inch of their success is because of their family influence. There are alumni whose parents had direct access to various CJIs, Sonia Gandhi, Manmohan Singh, P Chidambaram etc, which got them ahead.
- For those who are non-nepo kids and are successful, they had well-wishers in politics. One person who joined the BJP had Arun Jaitley’s blessings and is thriving today (to his credit, he genuinely believes in Hindutva and is not a turncoat opportunist). Another person was dating an influential lady politician, who pushed his career — all it takes are a few phone calls in Delhi.
If you are a non-political, non-nepo kid who is a regular law firm partner or in-house counsel, 99% of times your life will be like that of a software engineer or corporate executive at the sane level —very nice and comfortable, but not super-luxurious.
Wow. Thoughts on this?
I am aged and that's the problem . I am 25 years old .
My background is I am a physiotherapist intern from a top college and studying for Government exams and most likely will clear them as I am getting good scores in ssc and banking mocks . Ssc prime Target . Will Target bigger exams like rbi once get ssc .
What to do crack exam and join government job or is there scope in law .
My goal is earning money .
Also as ya intelligent people should I consider mba or something or too old for everything and stick to govt job as my course has less and underpaid vacancy.
Also, every hearing / order feels personal for the client. They suddenly become know it all and have an opinion on everything. Hindsight 20/20 happens instantly after every hearing. "We should have made this argument - the judge was not happy", "You should have gone with that senior counsel - my relative told me he is very good" "you should have framed the cross question differently... We could have caught him"
You need a really thick skin to be in litigation.
I believe you are under an obligation to every hard-working law student from economically disadvantaged or other marginalised backgrounds with meaningful aspirations towards a litigation career who is a member of the LI community and who may have been negatively impacted by this statement. Even if it was a joke, I think the 'trollish' tag is broad enough to encompass a recognition that it is a politically incorrect joke. Now please do the honourable thing and provide that explanation. Alternatively, publicly apologise and resign from your position as an LI moderator.
I seriously need help/guidance on the personal matter i am handling. I think i have already f'ed up a couple of times. It would be great if someone handling civil matters in Mumbai can connect with me on - lawconnect2025@gmail.com
I remember pulling all-nighters and reading the same lines 5 times before understanding basic shit.
One day it got so bad and I was worried I was going to break down. She got the hint and asked me to leave all work and come out for a sweet break. We sat in the break room and had desserts for an hour, talked about non-work matters, and got back to work after that. It was the best break in my experience and we finished the report without any hiccups.
TLDR: take a break, have desserts, and get back to work.
Harvard guys working on changing their name soon.
Trump University or Trump Law School for survival
GOAT status. A polymath. If he had stuck to only the profession, he would be a head and shoulder above the rest of the current leaders. Have had the pleasure to brief him back in the day.
will it make my life difficult??
2. VIPS
Other one not to be considered.
An NLU must be preferred.
You see a mentor once told me, when I was deciding between HNLU and JGLS is that when you go to Jindal not only you're expecting a fee bump but a lifestyle bump too. Which has it's own costs. Thus, if you can afford that do join Jindal.
Both in Jindal or any T2 NLU for that matter you'll need to work hard to get placed. You'll need to put efforts. It's not going to be easy at either place. Sure at Jindal you'll get more resources but there are going to be more distractions too.
What’s the rationale for such disparity. These T-2s can afford to pay at least 20 LPA right?
Will be interested in viewing their videos :)