We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
1 SAM, 1 CAM
Too much drama (for real), too much shit work, quality of work is pretty bad
You cannot make up for an undergraduate degree from a so-so institution by getting an llm from your nls/nalsar/nujs/jgls/nlud etc. It just doesnt work like that in the industry. Work ex will carry a lot more weight. Understand that partners and PAs and SAs more often than not do not have an LLM themselves. They dont know what the degree is or how its supposed to make you more hire-able. Its as foreign to them as surgery is to a psychiatrist.
If you want to do academia- go for it. Do the LLM. If you want to work abroad- get into the fanciest possible llm programme in UK/US and you might end up with a job at the end of it. Maybe some government posts require an LLM. But otherwise- stay in the workforce.
However, I have been handling a personal matter before a few forums and I would like to accept that I was wrong. There are so many things to lear. Every forum has its own procedural quirks. Every judge has their biases and mannerisms. Knowing which judge runs with their cases and you need to be at the court at what time. The disappointment when you have prepared everything and on the date of the hearing the judge is on leave. The physical effort you need to put going from your fancy offices to those old shabby buildings with no air circulation wearing that thick blazer. Running for photocopies and for filings at the eleventh hour.
I seriously think they should be paid at par with the corporate folks. If you are a corporate associate and think otherwise, I would highly recommend handling at least one matter on your own.
1 veritas
1 AZB
You have made me a little less stressed as I settle into a strange city and a strange job!
https://www.news18.com/politics/from-centrism-to-far-more-muscular-nationalism-tharoor-outlines-congress-to-bjp-changes-in-india-ws-l-9433159.html
He remains to be at par with Salve and Rohatgi. In fact, out of the present lot - his juniors such as Rajshekhar Rao, Siddharth Aggarwal are shining at the bar.
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/trichy/readmission-tnnlu-rolls-back-circular-on-parental-presence/amp_articleshow/122347829.cms
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/trichy/after-delaying-scholarship-tnnlu-withholds-results-of-sc/st-students/amp_articleshow/122370090.cms
Should I take a financial risk and pick Jindal? Is it worth the financial risk and is Jindal as good as the top law schools?
Or should I pick NLUO and work hard there to grab the best opportunities?
This is the first time I'm commenting on this platform, and I apologise if I made any mistakes. Thanks!
Thanks and regards.
And if someone becomes a Judge at 30 - 32, what are the chances of becoming a HC Judge
20 LPA (Fixed) + 5-7 LPA (Bill share) + 6 LPA (Bonus)
I am aware fixed can be higher if you lateral from a T1 and can negotiate well
2. Granted, law school doesn't teach some at least of what it should. However, it teaches basic skills. Reading and being able to write a summary of a case!! If you didn't learn that from your law school, then your choice of law school was wrong. Simples.
3. As far as it goes, that statement is correct: "Failing CLAT is not the end of the world and anyone’s career." Then have you passed AILET, the other major entry test for good legal education in India? Very well, then: have you been able to prove yourself in systems that are arguably better than the Indian one? Have you gotten yourself a good degree in a non-law subject and past the LSAT (U.S.) and been able to get into a T14 law school or good Canadian uni? Have you been able to have a combo of good LNAT score + top-of-the-range school marks + (depending on the circumstances) a good IELTs score to get into a good UK uni (Oxbridge/some of the UoL unis/Warwick etc)? No? If all the answers are no, then I am sorry, de facto it is the end of the career for many people. You are actively causing harm, by propagating a false picture, if you don't admit this to be the unvarnished truth.
I have mostly done basis diligence and research before I recieved the day zero offer. Please share helpful notes here I'm stressed for many weeks now. And how I can improve before joining the office (any courses from home or anything to improve basics)
He also loved coming in on Saturdays, and staying in office till 9pm or 9.30pm, even when there was no work or deadline. He also expected us to come in and waste our day in the office.
The kicker, the man used to come into office not before 1pm on weekdays, and around 3.30pm on Saturdays, while we had to come in early by 10 or 11. Can you imagine the toxicity in that office? God it was suffocating. I was elated when I could finally quit.