We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
AZB- 4
S&R- 2
Tri- 1
Panag and Babu - 2
IC RegFin - 1
Side note: Why on earth doesn't Trilegal have management training for SAs and Counsels? They are, in effect, managing Associates and Senior Associates. For a forward thinking firm like Trilegal that has done quite a bit in other areas, this one seems like a no-brainer.
Whatโs happening in the small set-up?
Can our masters and PhD be in different subjects ? How will affect my academic career ?
If my LLM is in constitutional law and I want to pursue my PhD in public policy, is it acceptable?
Also, will I still get to teach in law Universities without a PhD in law ?
I have a LLM and NET, so will that be enough for NLUs, provided I have a PhD but not in law ?
Help ??!
Your comment would make a lot of sense in the year 2000. Today, things have changed. A generalist law degree (like a BA-LLB) followed by an LLM in a special area would make sense. Today, that differentiation is happening at the UG level itself. There is a reason why questions are being raised about having generalist civil service officers versus specialist ones. The need and demand for specialist roles are rising.
At the current moment, all top law colleges are managed and led by those who are products of the traditional BA-LLB-oriented thinking and approach; hence, they will resist change. For real transformation to happen, the current crop has to retire, and new law schools that are not bound by archaic thinking have to crop up. It is happening, and they are NOT going to be the state NLUs. Let's talk after 10 years. Sure. By then, it will be embarrassing to even say that one holds a BA-LLB degree.
Does not having a degree science hinder your career at IPR law?
Both Amit and Akhil have a top notch commercial litigation practice at DHC and SC.
It's probably that they are not that involved in political cases which becomes a good media masala unlike their father and they became seniors quite young, so KS not helping them seems hilarious.
Now coming to Gopal SanksโLOL, comparing him to the Sibal Bros is apples and orangutans. The Sibals are swimming in the big-money stuffโcommercial disputes, fat arbitration gigs, courtroom drama with corporate stakes. Thatโs not the SCโs usual vibe, btw. The Supreme Court is more into the aam janta spaceโpublic interest, policy, constitutional questions- and, yes - the occasional commercial appeal. Not where the money flows, but easier to enter if youโve got, like, half a brain, a decent handle on English, and the holy trinity: unpaid work, a sponsor, and most criticallyโa GURU. Your ticket to the club is referrals, baby.
Gopal didnโt come from crorepati cash, but letโs not kid ourselvesโhe had elite privilege. Bureaucrat dad. KKV as his legal godfather. What he did have was serious driveโand he ran with it. That combo? Lethal. And thatโs why heโs where he is.
If anything both Akhil and Amit Sibal are doing both hardcore commercial matters before all Courts and Tribunals, and are probably earning more than GS.
PS - Earning more or working exclusively in the Supreme Court is no measure of success. My point is both GS and the Sibal brothers are doing well and are on similar levels - one can't compare
Saraf
12 PPOs for NLUO
In Mumbai most Advocates suggest to apply for Letters of Administration and not the Heirship certificate.
Can anyone please explain why is it so?
What is the practical difference between the two, and which would be more beneficial?
Whats the Lit scene like in Chennai. specifically,
1. What are the starting salaries for freshers in the various law firms in chennai ?
2. What are the starting salries for freshers with senior counsels and independent lawyers in chennai ?
please someone help me out with a fresh perspective
What this feels said isn't incorrect to be honest.
Anyway, what are you even reaching out to them for once you have confirmed the PPO (i.e. what are they ghosting you about)? If it is about the internship, again, have never heard of anyone from a T1 uni being asked to do a rolling internship for a year. If it is about a one month internship or about location etc, maybe they need more time and they'll tell you a few months later. Have never heard of this happening to anyone else.
Perhaps try to get some information by asking an indirect confirmation like: โWhen will I approximately get to know regarding further joining details?โ or โWill I be directly joining (X) Partnerโs team itself?โ to gauge the current status of the PPO if you can.
Hang in there though!
= "I am from an allegedly good college in Mumbai with a good CV, but my college is not an NLU"
If the big day doesn't work for you, take NLSAT and try to get into NLS. Otherwise, go for litigation for now.
NB: To be clear about definitions, "[passing] CLAT" = "admission into T1 NLU", nothing more, nothing less.
My seniors, including the partner I was working under, are nice people. I think thatโs why, it feels worse disappointing them everytime. Moreover, I have been working hard, staying late in the office to get work done. However, that hasnโt helped me deliver a decent work product. As a result, I think, I havenโt been getting as much work either in the past week.
A few weeks ago, I thought I was getting a hang of everything and I was getting a lot of work, but now I donโt know how to proceed. A major part of me now thinks that this profession, because of itโs requirement to attention to detail, isnโt for me. I donโt even understand where my concentration goes or/and how I end up making an error. Also, I donโt feel like working, because I know that even with my best efforts, I am going to deliver a substandard work product. Even so, I like law and transactions in general. Part of me wants to be in the profession for whatever reason.
I need guidance as to how to proceed. I saw another post here on making a checklist. What should the checklist consist of? Is there anything else I can do to help myself? I am trying to take my work slow, but even then, I catch some things amiss on a re-read when the document has been sent out. After that, my morale reaches a low point and I donโt feel like working all over again. Because of this, I have been feeling very anxious as well, which was not a problem as much even when I was burdened with a lot of work.