We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
...
"According to the present findings, Democrats (more than Republicans) tightly centre their belief-system around a set of positions at the extremes of these particular items, implying that people who deviate from these positions are likely to be considered as outgroup members (extremity should thereby be understood as a function of both, the formulation of the item and the response). It is possible that holding extreme (and thus unnegotiable) attitudes on important social-political issues has become increasingly identity defining for Democrats, not least in response to Donald Trump's controversial presidency. The pattern does not imply that Republicans are more tolerant than Democrats, nor that Republicans could deal better with attitudinal uncertainty. It does imply, however, that –at this particular moment in time– Democrats and Republicans are constructing and managing their partisan identities differently in relation to the topics reflected in these questionnaire items. "
https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjso.12665
To be honest, I just want the LLM badge - not keen on pouring in too much effort. BA LLB and the law firm grind have already taken their toll. Ideally looking for an institute that’s reasonably priced (“sasta”) and doesn’t demand heavy time or academic commitment.
Open to suggestions - nothing too fancy, just not terrible either.
He needs you more than you need him
Also please share some HR questions that were asked from you as well as technical questions (specially for disputes)
Ye le aur bol le fake news. The truth is NLUD can never be in the leagues of NLS/NALSAR and NUJS. It's a tier 2 college masquerading as a tier 1 courtesy papa NIRF
NLUD is horrible if you want a job, their PPO statistics for 2026 are almost same as HNLU/NLUO
CAM-3
S&R-2 (one person got offers both from CAM and S&R)
HSF-1
Linklaters- 1
Panag and Babu- 3
KCO-1
Tri-1
TTA-1
ICUL-1
would love the input of learned LL peeps <3
Mamata as CM = Bhat, Amit Talukdar and NKC as VCs = Sanjay Basu and Kalyan Banerjee on the governing body.
Res ipsa loquitor.
Who it WILL be: Probably Rathin (▮▮▮) or one of the two Dubes (▮▮▮ but not terrible).
Who it CAN be: Faizan Mustafa. His political ideology will suit the TMC and also the students, who are mostly left-leaning. At the same time, he governed NALSAR well. First thing he did as NALSAR VC was write a letter to all alumni requesting their help and inputs.
Who it WON’T be: VCV or Sinha. No political heft.
1. Clear NET immediately. You can do it in 4-5 months prep. December NET is coming up. You can easily get NET. You can focus on JRF later since the age is till 33, and it requires more preparing time. So first and foremost clear NET asap
2. Once you've cleared NET immediately apply for PhDs. In central universities without net, you won't stand a chance in interviews. For NLUs, you may have a slight advantage, however some NLUs do take their own entrance exam. Apply for it.
3. Focus solely on your research proposal. Contact faculty if you can and once you establish good communication. You can send them your RP for suggestions. Once you sit in the interview, they will definitely help if they are familiar with you.
4. Once you get into a PhD program. Once your initial coursework is done, that's where you need to attend university, once done you immediately start applying for Assistant Professorship in various universities.
5. NET+PhD pursuing will help you get more offers than without net
1. Anuj Bhuwania: NLSIU batch of 2000 (age approx 48/49). PhD from Columbia, presently Professor at SNU Chennai, ex-Jindal. Excellent bio.
https://law.snuchennai.edu.in/faculty/anuj-bhuwania/
2. Sarasu Esther Thomas: NLSIU Batch of 1995 (age approx 53-54). Professor at NLSIU, currently on lien as Director of Manipal Law School.
https://www.nls.ac.in/faculty/sarasu-esther-thomas/
Help a brother out •́ ‿ ,•̀
So are lots of Cammies, Sammies etc flocking to these places?
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx2nwp9z39lo
we bill good, but the pay is ▮▮▮ compared to the billings.
i get in hand around 18 lpa.
▮▮▮
I want to learn about what to do in law school when starting out. I wanna land a T1 firm with a PPO most probably because placement just doesn't exist in IPU. Kindly give some advice to a younger brother.
The sentencing was announced after the court found the accused guilty on Thursday, following a trial that concluded within eight months of the incident. The additional sessions judge delivered the verdict on Friday.
The nine convicts have been identified as Md Imtiyaz Ansari, Shahid Ali Shaikh, Shahrukh Rafik Shaikh, Jatin Anup Ladwal, Rohit Singh, Rupesh Yadav, Sahil Singh, Pathan Sumaiya Banu, Pathan Sumaiya Banu, and Faldu Ashoke. Four of the convicts are from Maharashtra, three from Haryana and two from Gujarat.
https://www.indiatoday.in/amp/india/law-news/story/indias-first-digital-arrest-conviction-nine-people-sentenced-to-life-by-bengal-court-2758042-2025-07-19