We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
We also have to make time for co curriculars, right?
You are of course not obligated to be patriotic. But reducing everything to “my life, my priorities” and dismissing broader responsibilities not even out of disagreement, but out of apathy feels like a hollow way to go through the world.
Of course, I agree it’s not treason to feel no attachment to a country. No one is legally or morally bound to wave a flag or recite slogans. But what is worth reflecting on is the mindset that proudly centers everything around “I, me, myself” — as if detachment from any larger context is a badge of wisdom. Choosing to prioritise your personal well-being is valid. Most people do, to some extent. But when that becomes your onlg lens where even the idea of caring about anything beyond your immediate circle is dismissed as pointless it doesn’t come across as clarity. It comes across as disconnection. What’s concerning isn’t that you want to leave India, or join another army, or live life on your own terms. It’s the casual pride in not caring. That’s not liberation; that’s emotional isolation, and eventually, it narrows your world down to something smaller than it needs to be.
Anyway, best of luck with the French Foreign Legion. I hear the existential crisis comes free with the uniform.
She is the reason it became Tier 1 from Tier 2.5.
Why did he run to CAM? We may never know the full truth of it of course, but if you think JSA was giving him any autonomy you're mistaken. The JMP-ExCom cabal runs the whole firm, very much like a lala firm. Lateral-ing in as an EP means you will be an outsider for years. In a Lala setup, there is a very simple hierarchy - the bigger your books, the more freedom you have. Iqbal's books will open a lot of doors for him.
The stick is not shown.
That will be on the timesheet management side.
1. Junior Advocate.
2. Litigation team of a BFSI or company.
3. Litigation team of law firm.
UGC NET?
Congratulations on getting the 2 interviews mate but just because it worked out for you doesnt imply that other people’s criticism of this process isnt justified.
Best way is to approach legal recruiters.
For your second question. I have already stated in the above. And the answer is no. There ain't any platforms.
The decision to unilaterally remove all corporate law electives including crucial commercial law offerings like Mergers & Acquisitions, Securities Law, and Equity,significant electives in international law (e.g., International Commercial Arbitration) or rights-based domains (e.g., Disability Law, Juvenile Justice) and replace them with a narrow selection of criminology-focused electives such as Forensic Sciences, Criminology and Victimology, and Transnational Crime is both pedagogically indefensible and professionally limiting. These changes appear to reflect the personal academic interests of NKC rather than the academic and career needs of a diverse student body.
The implicit assumption that all students would benefit from, or are interested in, what is effectively a criminology-centric curriculum is as absurd as it is exclusionary. It fundamentally disregards the academic and professional aspirations of students who wish to pursue careers in corporate law, litigation, arbitration, or international law.
Equally alarming is the reported violation of BCI rules through the removal of mandatory Clinical Courses such as Professional Ethics and Professional Accounting System. The introduction of non-mandatory courses like Indirect Tax in their place contradicts BCI mandates.
This is not merely an issue of academic mismanagement; it represents a serious threat to the foundational pluralism of the NUJS curriculum. For an institution once hailed for its academic breadth and autonomy, these changes risk converting the law school into an echo chamber of one man’s interests.
which office btw?
With Palestine, the thing is this- it's committing genocide in open. Others at least say that there is no genocide. China never admits to a genocide, neither does Pakistan. Israel has no qualms in admitting it is blocking food relief and levelling Gaza.
Business Associations, Cases and Materials on Agency, Partnerships, LLCs, and Corporations (University Casebook Series) 11th Edition
Securities Regulation: Cases and Materials [Connected Ebook] (Aspen Casebook) 10th Edition