any update on this one? Anyone who can share their experience of working in Singapore and the entire process of shifting to Singapore (becoming qualified) and even throw some light on the aspect of daily living?

How is the work culture? How is the pay? Is there any work life balance?

Please change the title from "NKC has destroyed NUJS" to "TMC has destroyed NUJS". Because, prior to 2011, NUJS had:

- Menon, Chmini and MP Singh as VCs: all stellar academics and very honest people

- Top SC lawyers like KKV, Gopal Subramanian and Dipankar Gupta on the governing body

- No interference from the government in administrative and academic matters

- Erudite politicians like Jyoti Basu, Buddhadev Bhattacharya and Somnath Chatterjee backing the institution (two of them being UK-educated barristers) --- not semi-literate goons.

Do you know what Mamata did, shortly after she came to power? She appointed her ASTROLOGER to the governing body! https://www.indiatvnews.com/politics/national/mamata-astrologer-to-law-university-s-general-council-7533.html

I won't spend time listing the other misdeeds. Will take me hours.

For me, the key date that will determine the future of NUJS will be March-May 2026. If the electorate votes for status quo, then I'd prefer that the college be shut down rather than operate like this.

Agree with the general point of the post and most of the deets. A few corrections.

A. PWD means the university did not hold a tender at all. Since technically it represents state government, hence it doesn't have to be awarded through tender. This is state PWD, which is even worse in terms of efficiency and charges way more.

B. Who are these LLM students who are teaching?

C. Faculty sensitisation won't help with the marks. In law, one cannot expect to score 90 out of 100. Too much subjectivity. This isn't science. The ten pointer scale was itself faulty. A MAKAUT tech guy had suggested that, who has since then been removed from the VC position even there.

D. Most important point, students are the main sufferers under his rule. Why aren't they protesting? Why aren't the alumni banding together like NLSIU alumni to push for a good VC? If they accept him meekly, why will the state bother?

Since NKC started his tenure, NUJS is on a constant downfall. There is rampant construction all around the tiny 5 acre campus which has led to the extinction of green cover in the campus, apart from destroying the minimal amount of public spaces that students had. The same construction has been going on for multiple amount of years while the deadline has passed way back, along with the tender going to the least efficient department i.e., PWD, with the cooperation of which NKC must be minting millions. The introduction of the BSc batch is a disaster in itself, where the fees of the newly introduced batch is close to double while they are being taught by sub-par faculty, some of whom are currently pursuing LLM at NUJS and are not even experienced professors. The implementation of the program was never thought about, which has led to the students of the existing B.A Llb program to suffer. NKC was confronted by the student body prior to the introduction of the BSc batch regarding their prospects in the corporate sphere and the assistance NUJS would provide as an institution to aid the same. However, NKC outrightly denied any assistances, citing that the program is a specialisation in the field of forensic science. However, after the admission of two batches since the introduction of the program, his stance has conveniently changed when it came to forming the Recruitment cell for the new program, putting the students of the prevailing B.A batch at a disadvantage by increasing the batch size by almost 2 times, and the number of opportunities being the same. Not only has he spoilt the future of the recently admitted batches, he had already endangered the careers of the batches of 2025 and 2026, by putting in place an arbitrary grading scale out of 10. Little did he know that he would have to also sensitise the faculty who had to mark these students according to the new 10-pointer scale, while they continued to mark them according to the old 7-pointer scale, leaving the batch topper of these batches to attain a maximum CGPA of 7.5 out of 10 because the criterion to achieve the highest grades was 95 out of 100, while the teachers barely awarded 70-80 marks to even the highest scoring student in that subject. He soon after realised that this would affect the image of the institution as a whole before the law firms, and more importantly. premium institutions abroad whose screening criteria requires students to have minimum CGPA OF 6 or 7, which is unattainable for the students of Batch of 2025 and 2026 due to the high benchmark set and the lack of sensitisation of faculty. Later, he had to change the threshold for the highest grades from 95 to 80, which is closer to the threshold of 75 that was used in the 7-pointer scale, to which the professors were accustomed to. Other ancillary aspects like lack of reimbursements for moots and ADR competitions, lack of sporting and medical facilities, arbitrary medical leave policy, and multiple attempts to derail the academic quality of the institution by replacing eminent professors with “Teaching Assistants” and numerous other things, have put the student body at a major disadvantage and the same has taken a large toll on their mental health and academic performance. It is high time that the administration starts looking for his replacement at the earliest, keeping in mind the UGC mandated age bar of 70 years which he is about to breach, to save the integrity of the institution.

The only time you are standing or walking in litigation is during Court hours. You spend rest of the time drafting, filing or briefing seniors - so you will be required to sit for long intervals.

As for freedom with small breaks - it really depends on finding the optimal chamber for your needs and wants. Its really a matter of luck because most chambers come with their own drawbacks.

- What is the tentative joining date?

- Is there a joining bonus? (Pay is 18 LPA, right?)

- I have not been enrolled in CAM’s Associate Training Program (ATP), and it seems my team hired me as a dedicated resource for their team. Is this a good or bad thing?

- Should I speak to my team or HR to request inclusion in ATP?

- Is there any disadvantage to being a dedicated hire rather than part of ATP? I’m experiencing FOMO since almost everyone else is in ATP except me.

Context- I am a fresher who will be graduating in 2025 and joining CAM this year.

If you have genuine advice based on experience, I would greatly appreciate it.

not a bad idea, I have seen people do this many a time. Some even go for a masters if there's any particular area of law that highly interests them, maybe you could consider that a year from now as well.

Also, mind sharing what's your pay like and which industry is the company based in?

Hi everyone, this is the OP here.

I apologise for the inconvenience my query caused. I had posted my doubts on other forums as well but most of the answer weren’t useful and some were outrightly trollish. I don’t wish to spend money on something which I regret later, I posted this here anticipating a positive response from individuals who have been in a similar position at some point. The thought Moving to the other end of the country is very daunting for me and I was only trying to be cautious.

Thank you for the useful suggestions.

Woah!! Woah!! Calm down. I don't think anyone deserves these kinds of words at the least. I know what this feels like. But in some way, the guy saying it isn't completely wrong, nor you pointing out the same is wrong. But kindly keep a civil decorum at least if said so. Mod(s), I would request that such conversations be marked as abusive (the one I am replying to). No matter if they are right, such usage will only degrade the quality of this forum.

I appeared for an interview last week at JSA’s Delhi office for a Associate position in the Regulatory Disputes team. The interview was taken by AV and RK, both partners and went well. However, I haven’t received any update since then. I followed up via email yesterday but haven’t heard back. So how long does it usually take to hear back from the Delhi disputes team after interviews? Should i consider it declined? Also, when would it be appropriate to follow up with HR over call?

Also would appreciate any insights on the work culture, timings and the work from current or former associates.

I appeared for an interview last week at JSA’s Delhi office for Associate position in the Regulatory Disputes team. The interview was taken by ▮▮▮ and ▮▮▮, both partners of the team and went well. However, I haven’t received any update since then. I followed up via email yesterday but haven’t heard back. I’d like to know how long does it usually take to hear back from the Delhi disputes team after interviews? Should i consider it declined? Also, when would it be appropriate to follow up with HR over call? Also, would appreciate any insights on the work culture, timings and the work from current or former associates.

That's more or less been the case throughout the years. Especially since when they started relying upon their legacy instead of their own achievements. The earlier batches had been arrogant too, say before 2015-16, but they had the substance to back it up. That's no more the case.

Hi guys, I'm a recent A1 at a Teir 1 in Cap Marks. I see that this is the only team majorly working around the clock all the time. Other teams have this pressure but it's not all-year round. Given the boom in the market, all firms are taking more and more transactions and there is no firm left which genuinely focuses on learning and growth. The seniors do not have a personal life and when you ask them if they want to do this, they say that they're stuck in this and it's too late to get out as this is a niche area.

I wanted to know if I should switch now so that I don't make the same mistakes my seniors did and if so are there any other practice areas at Teir 1 firms with reasonable work hours and expectations (obviously there may be waves of bad times as long as it is not perpetual). It would be great if I could get inputs from people at different practice areas at various T1s.

if they really are illegal immigrants and not just undocumented people from our own country. I think it might be a reasonable middle ground to argue that whatever immigration that does happen- and different states might need different levels and kinds of immigration depending on their demography and policy goals- there should only be legal immigration.

Trouble is. deporting a lot of people in a short amount of time is difficult to get right. What are we doing to make sure there arent mistakes? to ensure that we arent being inhumane to those we are deporting?

All true, but that does not for a second change that RS created ELP. Without him the firm would not be the size / quality it is (quality speaks of tax & tax lit only).

The man has a created a 150+ person firm and is now a very busy Senior Advocate. Either one alone would be very impressive.

How can you even compare ELP and Poovayya / Lall & Sethi? While both are very respectable firms, ELPs tax team alone would be larger than both of them combined.

Most people on here are so blinded with M&A/PE/Corp that that seems to be the only relevant metric for Tier 1/2 classifications. But if you look at Tax, which is a very large and very lucrative practice, ELP & LKS are the two undisputed Tier 1 firms. That house was built on RS’ shoulders, without him there would be no ELP.

It is what it is. Even UK has some exceptional law schools which churn out far better students than our Tier-1 slot. But recently, the hiring (only in UK) has increased a bit, partly because the toppers in every NLU (well till NLIU/GNLU) are doing smart work. So the situation has gotten better, if you compare the stats.

One explanation I got was that, foreign forms especially in the US, already get excellent lawyers from their ivies, cause let’s be honest, they are much more well trained than us, where the main subject is STEM.

But what about U.K. and Singapore? Even they hardly a single/or maximum 2-3 offers to our domestic students and that too, who have exceptionally performed in their academics, publications and foreign moots. Why don’t these jurisdictions hire in bulk?

Are you guys that desperate to defend the Congress regime in Karnataka? Please wake up and smell the coffee. There is now blatant toxic identity politics being done in Karnataka, as a desperate strategy because the BJP defeated the Congress in the Lok Sabha elections in the state and is currently favoured to retake the state in the Vidhan Sabha elections. Please also don’t downplay the rise of Hyderabad and Ahmedabad, just because the NDA is in power in those states.