We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
That Fintech engineer with 8PQE mostly has good to decent WLB. He/She will be having a family. IT/Tech is better in terms of WLB - weekends, logging off times, of course compared to any Law firms because of Western Culture. Is that possible in a tier 1 law firm? No.
With a tier 1 law firm job, it's practically impossible to raise a fully functional family. Most of 8QE (especially women) are unmarried, doesn't have kids or have a dysfunctional/on verge of divorce family life. Wheras in IT/Tech people can properly raise a family with that job.
It's better to compare the Tech guys salary to an in house lawyers salary. Because the level of stress and hours are similar.
Tier 1 law firm lifestyle is not sustainable in the long term. Even if you don't have a family, it's still hard to work at a tier 1 firm. It's highly stressful and intensive.
I promise I'm not trying to be smart. Just need better education on law firm dynamics. So if there is a way that both these can be true, please explain it to me (as if I were five years old).
1. For abroad (in case you're thinking of UK and Australia, in particular). What are your school marks (10th and 12th) like? Are they at least above 90% of ICSE or CBSE?
2. Again, this question is based on the assumption of you thinking about abroad. How good was your relationship with your 11th and 12th schoolteachers? You will need a letter of recommendation from a teacher in 11th and 12th for an application to study law at a UK uni.
3. Did you take the LNAT for Jindal? If so, what were your marks on the LNAT? UK unis aren't like Jindal, where they will take any old fart that shows up. The ones that use LNAT as part of their admission processes (Oxford, Cambridge, King's, LSE, UCL, Bristol) have typical score ranges on their websites for what marks people typically achieve on the reading section of the LNAT.
(https://sansad.in/getFile/BillsTexts/RSBillTexts/Asintroduced/Hate%20speech-%20KR-%20E%201219202350136PM.pdf?source=legislation) in case anyone is interested in the full text
One of the key features of this bill is that it seems to have a wide variety of beneficiaries. Here's an excerpt from the bill
(3. A person who intentionally and within the hearing or sight of another person or
group of persons uses, publishes, presents, produces, plays, provides, distributes or
directs the performance of any speech that:โ
(i) incites, justifies, promotes or spreads discrimination, hatred, hostility, or
violence against a person or group of persons; or
(ii) denigrates a person or group of persons by reasons of their real or
attributed characteristics or status, which includes religion, race, caste or
community, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, place of birth, national or
ethnic origin, language, age, or disability shall be guilty of an offence of hate
speech.)
This is the definition of the offence of hate speech in this bill , is it likely to pass the constitutionality test ? , is it good legislation ? And finally how likely is this to even pass ? Private member bills usually get sidestepped , this bill hasn't lapsed yet and has been pending for a while now. I've always found it frustrating how private member bills are essentially useless and irrelevant even though they cover many issues that government doesn't draft bills on (there's bills on universal Healthcare and dealing with extreme poverty that were drafted by private members)
https://www.financialexpress.com/trending/india-is-lying-our-gdp-is-all-wrong-hotmail-co-founder-sabeer-bhatia-questions-5-trillion-economy-push/3803999/
https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/donald-trump-says-us-will-tariff-pharmaceuticals-soon-how-it-may-impact-india-8121233#pfrom=home-ndtv_topscroll
2. Training contract offers do not come via contacts. They only come via assessment of candidate's performance at the vacation scheme.
3. I am familiar with these processes myself, having been through them. Any contacts you have can only help you to a limited extent. At most, if you know a lawyer at a foreign firm and have discussed the work they do in a practice area, it might be worth mentioning that in your application. No more. If they don't like your interview, assessment centre or (where applicable) SJT performance, no amount of glowing reviews from contacts can get you over the line. Whoever may have told you otherwise is bullshitting.
A caveat to this last point: Getting a contact you may have at a firm to look over your application or mock interview you and provide you with feedback is an obvious advantage.
6000 increase per month really? This is utterly poor
May I know the reason why
GST on everything.
High income tax.
Rising educate costs for children.
This is the story for all white collar professionals in India. It seems only the super rich and super corrupt have it easy. So do we then have to keep on working till 60/70, to fund MP salaries, subsidies and loss-making PSUs?
Thanks
- Oldies play it (the anti-woke generation that dumps on Gen Z all day long)
- This generation has made pickleball elitist by playing in posh clubs and gated communities, and also making retailers sell cheap-ass plastic equipment for high prices (Gen Z hates elitism)
- Pickleball is played by old tennis legends who Gen Z doesn't know about and can't relate to, like Agassi, Steffi Graf, Roddick etc.
As for the Olympics, they will include pickleball because the purchasing power and influence of Gen X and Gen Y are higher than Gen Z (on a per-capita basis at least). We had a new Gen Z sport in the Paris Olympics (breaking). Turned out to be a big flop.
Some batchmates in other firms became SA in 2023 and 2024 also. Some
A PSU legal role is not for those who are highly ambitious, aggressively career-driven, or ready to face the heat of litigation or the high-pressure environment of a tier-1 or tier-2 law firm.
However, for someone from a middle-class background with a practical outlook, the ability to adjust, and a willingness to let go of ego, it can offer a stable and respectable career.
Pros:
1. Decent and stable salary with timely increments and allowances.
2. Low to moderate workload, allowing for a better work-life balance.
3. Job security and structured working hours.
4. Sustainable work environment where an average performer can survive comfortably.
Cons:
1. Slower career progression compared to core technical or managerial staff.
2. Limited role in decision-making, mostly restricted to advisory functions.
3. Lack of recognition within the organizationโs hierarchy.
4. Stagnation risk if one doesnโt actively seek growth beyond routine work.