We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
First BCI tries to sneak in an amendment in newly proposed bill as per which first they tried to expand the definition of 'legal practitioners' to include corporate lawyers as well - meaning that they are taking a view that corporate lawyers are not 'advocates', which means then advertisement bar should not apply to corporate lawyers. DSK legal launched those advertisements precisely taking advantage of the same.
Now BCI has not only retracted the proposed amendments, but they have also clarified that the existing definition of advocate in the current legislation is all expansive enough.
paisa + 65% marks in LLB from any NLU guarantees LSE
Asking an Indian to learn Sanskrit today to work it as a link language is like asking an European to learn Latin.
Just be honest about why you want to do an mba, take help of coachings. But all this comes later, first crack that percentile
Expected. Hope he continues to get paid.
If OP is a general category student struggling to get a job, I think itβs perfectly legit advice to go to NZ.
Firstly, the warden pushed open the door, not the students. Infact initially, it was Vansh's own friends who were pleading the warden to not break open the door since his body was right by it.
Secondly, it is so mean to say that it was the student community alone "scrambling to save his life" when it was literally SRMs private vehicle which was used to take him to the hospital.
Finally, he did not die because of 'criminal negligence'. He didn't die because he fell into a pothole in the campus or got electrocuted by a live wire, he died because he literally committed sucide. It can't be negligence when it's a case of fucking sucide. Read the law.
Having said that, yes, the nurse did not know how to properly perform CPR and yes, there is no permanent ambulance in the campus and these are all valid concerns which were raised before the registrar and were accepted by him.
Moreover, there were students during yesterday's Preamble saga who were literally trying to raise the absence of 'SAC' this semester as an issue before the Registrar, all while Vansh's friends were actually trying to raise a valid list of demands before the VC and Registrar.
All of this is extremely disheartening to see.
This year alone has seen an alarming number of student suicides, beginning with NLUD at the very start of the academic year. This isnβt just about compromising the future of the legal fraternityβitβs about basic human lives now. Something must be done. Now.
If SAM doesn't pay the whole bonus component/ at least 3.5L to A0s, SAM announcement will be the biggest Jumla of the century in the legal industry.
A0s will get their first slice of working in family-owned business.
Woohoo!
Don't think starting pay in ip can be same ever
Pretty sure it caught government's attention because of the abuses it has been hurling over X
"No person shall be convicted of any offence except for violation of a law in force at the time of the commission of the act charged as an offence, nor be subjected to a penalty greater than that which might have been inflicted under the law in force at the time of the commission of the offence."
https://www-barandbench-com.opj.remotlog.com/news/litigation/supreme-courts-full-court-moves-to-strip-rishi-malhotras-senior-designation-citing-sharp-practices
Which is quite amazing for a 60-70 member team
Argus 18 LPA
KCO 22 LPA
DSK 9-10 LPA
Bible for the way Indian courts and Litigation machinery functions!
No need to get fired
Plus one time handset cost every two years