We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
https://www.news18.com/business/elon-musk-cant-be-successful-in-india-says-sajjan-jindal-as-he-bats-for-tatas-and-mahindra-ws-bd-9251616.html
If you have so much problem with college change your college from 2nd year, nmims or NLU as you suggested , go there please.
I myself have problem with the college but just bcoz your attendance is weak and some faculty doesnβt allow you to write exam, then the college is bad???
Just classic example of blaming the situation and putting the blame on someone else.....with no accountability of self... i have friends who have graduated from GLC... who said 10 years back too there were hardly any lectures held... old faculties have gone, so new are hired, laws updated in last 3 to 5 years, new rules and laws added, and u would want writer of the constitution to be your faculty .
https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/us-news/propalestine-students-face-crackdown-at-columbia-university-donald-trump-s-role-questioned-101741268647248.html
I honestly think the problem is that the moderators themselves seem to be students who lack maturity. They seem to be unable to behave in a fair manner. Perhaps some adults in the room need to step in to moderate.
If there are genuine greivances- against scam courses or professors- the appropriate place to bring it up is with your VC/ Dean. Follow an internal process.
Its not the professors job to make you know the information. Its your job. Its the professors job to know the information himself and to be available for guidance, do the needful in classes, evaluate your work. Thats it.
You wont become a good lawyer if its done in any other way. Cause a legal education doesnt end at university.
If youre not able to keep up with that- maybe you shouldnt be a lawyer- maybe you want an easier less challenging life- go work in a bank or run a restaurant.
Give a wide berth to women in office.
Find meaningful relationships outside.
the post straight up stating "throw WLB out for ten years" "available at all times" is what is scary.
i hope things change but at the same time with the constant growing population of india, it is bleak even if the younger generations stands up for it as hard as they can.
Get off your high horses assuming you're delivering top notch work and need to be treated well. Because - spoiler alert. It ain't true.
All of physical science evolved by people disagreeing about how to collect data, how to interpret it and how to test their hypothesis. Very good people disagreed with each other about whether the earth revolved around the sun or not. Galileo was persecuted by the emperors of his time because he said the earth revolved around the sun and proposed a helio-centric model.
The lesson you take from Galileo is that everyone should have had the implicit knowledge that the earth did revolve around the sun (even though Galileo was heretical for thinking so) and should have dismissed, condescended to, and ignored any opposition. The way you think about these questions would assume that we all know what the right thing to do is and we should all act on it. The truth is, we don't all know what the right thing to do is. No one knows what the right thing to do isβwe're humans and not gods. What we can do is through free and open debate come to an agreement about some facts. In a world where heretics are ignored or persecuted, we would not have most of modern medicine, we would be giving heroin to babies for a cold and not have any knowledge of what a gene or an atom is.
Youre drawing a strawman by saying that I think ideology holds all answersβthats explicitly not my position. My argument is that no ideology- not right left or middle- holds any answers. So if we're really invested in solving problems,. Solving problems rather than virtue signalling, then we shouldnt shy away from freely discussing how different people view problems and what solutions might or might not work.
Just because some disagreements are unproductive- take the flat earthers in 2020s- does not mean we begin from a place that treats disagreements as suspicious or from a place where we characterise our opponents poorly. Doing thatβwhat you're doing in this discussion nowβthats a bad faith argument.
Everyone in the whole damn world wants to end poverty and famine. The fact that we havent done so already doesnt indicate some apathy in society, it indicates that poverty and famine are difficult problems to solve. And we will not solve these complex problems by writing off arguments because they come from a certain ideology. we will not solve these problems by ignoring the experiences and data produced by people not considered ideologically pure enough.
I never said implementation or details dont matter. What a silly little strawman youve created. All I said was that the idea that every good faith disagreement would only boil down to details and implementation and there are no good faith disagreements to be had about how we view the world is silly.
Theres no point at all to gluing your hand to a road and screaming "just stop oil" if you do not want to have an adult conversation about how we conserve the environment while continuing to pull millions out of poverty. Just stop oil activists are very convinced that anyone who disagrees with them does so because theyre evil ghouls who do not care about the world. And that entertaining disagreement there is to give in to some thought control or liberal navel gazing. Its neither. They simply have a world view entirely devoid of nuance and depth and imagine that they can scream complex problems into a solution and that anyone who disagrees with them must be an evil facist.
Not like BITS or Amity is any better though
Bottom line: if you wanna be a Wall Street bro, then study what Wall Street bros study, ie STEM and MBA.
How is Dibyanshu team, work quality and bonus wise?