For once, just once, can you and everyone else having this pathological hatred of the NLSIU VC provide even a shred of evidence for your claims? Why do you folks always stop short of providing hard evidence that would prove just how terrible the VC has been? Are you not ashamed of yourself to reduce every conversation about a university by taking such stupid, incoherent shots against its VC?

HNLU2026 has provided a very good list of 13 law schools. I will like to add a few as good law schools if not the best, particularly for those who can’t afford the cost of NLUs:

DU

Jamia

BHU

GLC

ILS

AMU

School of Excellence, Ambedkar Law Univ, Chennai

ULC Bangalore

NLUJ has only 120

Plus the proportion of placements still higher

Secondly, please back up this fAr sUpEriOr analysis?

NLUJ has much greater alumni network since it was established way earlier + Vacations schemes and Training Contracts are also better than NLUD

Please get out this bubble kid.

SAM:

Bonus is paid in two tranches: 80% in March, 20% in May.

Fixed + Variable / Bonus = Salary

3 times of Salary = Target (pro rata) this means if you achieve 2 times of salary, you'll get 50% of your bonus.

6 times of Salary = 200% Target (pro rata) method is the same as above.

Billing is dependent on team so much so it's impossible to guess an average.

PS: Currently, Trilegal pays the highest in fixed component across all practice areas. Bonus wise, JSA and SAM are regarded as preferable options.

Exposure/ team atmosphere shape you as a professional/ person in the long run so as per me, this should be prioritised even if there's a compromise on salary.

Speaking at an event organised by Business Standard, Mr Kant said it had become "fashionable" to talk about not working hard.

"I strongly believe in hard work. Indians must work hard, whether it's 80 hours or 90 hours a week. If your ambition is to move from a $4 trillion to a $30 trillion economy, you can't do it through entertainment or by following the views of some film stars," he was quoted as saying.

https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/indians-should-work-hard-opt-for-80-hour-work-weeks-ex-niti-aayog-ceo-amitabh-kant-7821634#pfrom=home-ndtv_topstories

the consequence of cold emailing is just as bad as the consequence of not cold-emailing. You remain where you were. The reason why cold-emails are generally disregarded is because busy people don't have time to attain to your meager requests. Naturally, the would also not have time to be such low-lifes as to blacklist you. And even if a couple of them are, what difference does it make? Not like they were hiring you anyway? You won't last long working with people like them.

On the plus side, if you luck out, a partner may refer you. An HR may grant your request. A lawyer may give you work at his chambers. The chances are low, perhaps 1 of 100, but that doesn't mean you don't try. What harm could an email even do?

will this person guarantee our long life if we give 24 hours a day for 10 years?

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ruby-singh-ahuja-4a2a7486_i-know-this-post-of-mine-may-get-mixed-reactions-activity-7301476118832762881-rvhF?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_android&rcm=ACoAAD0pXu8BQO_BIwk-AgbwC323itCRuAKQcbE

If anybody from India wished to follow the Trump administration's example of cracking down on woke (a good thing to do on a personal level, an excellent way to spend time and helpful for society) and was asked for evidence of how it has infected peoples' minds, they need only pull up this thread and show this comment.

GLC has taken a nose dive effective 1st January. Disgusting faculty, pathetic administration and along with strictly enforced attendance. AZB Bombay cancelled about 20 internship slots on account of attendance issues. We don't even have designated internship breaks right now. Everything is looking bleak for both 3 and 5 year courses. Please please please save your self the stress and depression. Run from GLC. RUN away and share this to as many people as possible. This is a PSA. If you don't believe me I can share the link to high court proceedings against the admin for attendance. Asmita Vaidya, Principle Incharge is the sole reason for the downfall of this college. It will never ever be the same. Dusty Class rooms, broken windows, entire college covered with asbestos sheets instead of windows, no AC/working Fans, No Research software. It has nothing to offer. THode paise deke private college chale jao, facilities achhi milegi, law seekhne milega.

Hi Everyone, I don't know if many GLC students are there on this community, but I know we all are thinking about this and we all need to take some steps against this. Additionally the GLC Administration needs to be named and shamed for being this ▮▮▮ and ▮▮▮ about the ground realities. I am going to name each and every ▮▮▮ faculty, LI can decide how they want to proceed with this post, incase you want to black out the names its okay but please don't remove this post.

Starting with the complete ▮▮▮ of the Principal, who struggles ▮▮▮, is disconnected with students and her appointment itself is been ▮▮▮ as mentioned in the article below. She has suppressed the core law activities in the college. She and the admin have made it difficult for each and every important committee to function, including the ADR Cell, Moot Court Association and even the Placement Committee. She on a regular basis declines permissions to these important cells for conducting events only to end up giving permissions for Marathi Mandal and Cultural Committee two of the most useless committees in the college. She has managed to get GLC a extremely poor NAAC assessment by her sheer ▮▮▮, and is now punishing the students for speaking up against her in from of NAAC.

Half the data that has been submitted to NAAC is ▮▮▮. There are no research platforms provided to us, except the ones Government provides for free like NList, there is no Access to any rare book library or gymkhana either. The College is covered with dust, there are no windows, windows are covered with asbestos sheets instead. Upon a mere RTI one can find the sheer ▮▮▮ and ▮▮▮ going on ▮▮▮.

The Administration itself is ▮▮▮. They have tried to introduce Biometric attendance, which 90% of the times doesn't record our attendance or records it in some random subject we don't even have. They don't follow university timelines to declare results, our revaluation results come well after half a year. They can not even print our marksheets correctly. We ourselves have to go and show them the mistakes they have made, and if we are late in doing that they fine us! How ridiculous is that?? We are expected to be on time but the office staff will not come in before 11 and will leave before 4 pm. Not to mention the one hour lunch break.

GLC has the most, incompetent Law permanent faculty. Professors like ▮▮▮ ▮▮▮, ▮▮▮ ▮▮▮ who enforce attendance so strictly, don't even know the basics of law. ▮▮▮. There is a case going on against ▮▮▮ for not following the MU rules while enforcing attendance. But one can not blame ▮▮▮ because ▮▮▮. Both of them have made students beg and cry for letting them write papers.

Coming to attendance, GLC had excellent professors up until a few years ago. Ever since ▮▮▮ was appointed, the quality has dropped. They literally take walk in interviews for faculty that's how bad the situation is. As a recourse students started interning full time to secure jobs, which also Asmita is against. God forbid someone mentions internship in front of ▮▮▮. I believe ▮▮▮.

Please juniors please listen to me. People who are serious about getting jobs atleast, people who are considering joining GLC. Don't come here. Juniors transfer to ILS, NMIMS even PGCL ffs. I am telling you, I used to defend GLC to anyone and everyone. Its just never going to be the same anymore. I have attached a few links below. Anyone who doesn't believe me come to GLC for just a day, you will see what is going on. For the people who already are neck deep into their degree, we need to put Vaidya in her place. Suggest any and every idea you have to fight this, as a reply. I am doing this anonymously because I don't know how much support I have. If I get enough support we can start some offline action.

This is also a cry for intervention, to our Alumni if any on LI. Please please help us. To the counsels in HC, to the Partners in Law firms and to the Members of the Advisory Committee please help us.

#▮▮▮.

https://news.careers360.com/glc-mumbai-govt-law-college-fund-faculty-shortage-llb-llm-phd-courses-mumbai-university-br-ambedkar-nirf-naac-bci-fees-syllabus

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/bombay-high-court-directs-evaluation-for-law-students-with-low-attendance/articleshow/116179994.cms

If the choice were to me, I’d take nluo over du and definitely over cnlu. DU has the new course so no idea how it’d turn out, CNLU is just straight up not worth it. Has become non existent. While NLUO, though with its admin issues and everything, is still doing better than a lot of colleges in terms of placements. Has a good name in the industry too and tbh, I think it’s the best you can do with your rank unless probably HNLU or the likes of private colleges such as SLS Pune or Jindal.

Request for pay ? For just hanging around for 3-4 years? Bombay chamber system is completely different. It’s a pupilage system where senior doesn’t employ you as an associate and you are free to take your own work, even if it means accepting brief against your own senior.

You learn by working on briefs of your senior and observing. There is very healthy culture of discussion and debate within most chambers.

Eventually you wait for a right opportunity where you get your own brief to shine and excel.

I agree that it’s a tough practice, especially for someone who is not from the city and has fixed monthly outgoings.

I switched from in-house to T1 to in-house and back to the same T1 between 2020 to 2023. While the no of job switches were a concern for in-houses, the law firm never bothered. Probably, they knew me and were desperate to hire someone of my experience. Since law firms (T1/T2) have a pretty high attrition rate, they are generally not concerned about your job switches. I don't think your situation is bad.

Depends on the office and team. Bombay corp is great. The partners are very good, offer flexibility, and in general it’s a good work environment with a growing practice . Bombay litigation is the opposite. It is best avoided. The partners are horrible, prone to abusing and yelling for no reason. None of them are good at what they do, the clients are random except one or two occasional ones. You will be fired without reason, unannounced salary cuts, no support staff. If you can avoid working here you should. Your learning will be minimum now that the clients have dried up but your mental health will be fried for sure.