Concerning but not surprising. Colonial India was a land of native collaborators, from civil service to army to police to schools and universities. The children of these native collaborators obviously escaped the man-made famines and the arbitrary mass murders that were a routine part of the colonial life. Please understand that an overwhelming majority of colonial natives were collaborators (passive and/or active) in one way or the other and this pattern was naturally reflected in their political organisations, from the political left to the centre to the right. This collaboration was across class, caste, and gender. And to rub salt to the wound, the actual freedom fighters, who really tested the nerve of colonial regime were brutally murdered while the collaborators and their children (and their children today) happily “negotiated” for their freedom with their imperial overlords in a dialogue of mutual sympathy and necessity. So, of course, it should not shock anyone to witness the apologists of the colonial regime coming out proudly in forums like these today for they still constitute a majority in the country. The apologists do not indentify with the poor and the dead. And even without being lords, they would still very much like you to refer to them by “Your Lordship”.

Very disappointing response. We all know that all those things happened. We may even disagree with the OP's thesis because of those things. But treating it as some sort of unforgivable faux pas because of that is not good. Also, being eternally resentful about the past is not good either. It's bad for the national psyche, it's bad for peoples' personal mental situations.

Why is it that after all these decades of case law that Indian courts still struggle to agree on when is a defendant eligible for bail? It is both extraordinary and disconcerting how routinely constitutional courts like the Supreme Court of India (SCI) and the High Courts (HCs) disagree with each other on this question. The highest court in the land routinely adjudicates on bail yet its rulings end up creating even more ambiguities, precipitating yet another merry-go-round. This is neither the rule of law nor that of legal pluralism. Now granted that different categories of crime under different legislations may have made this a difficult enterprise to begin with but it is equally difficult to avoid the notion that on occasions officers of the court are just making it up as they go along. They have the discretion to both “relax” the conditions for bail in one instance without giving a definite reason and to also cancel the bail in another instance when it does not pass muster with their mood << https://indianexpress.com/article/india/supreme-court-eased-bail-norms-in-ed-cases-a-new-ruling-turns-the-clock-back-9835127/ >>.

Leaving aside the scope of corruption that this ambiguity regarding something as basic as bail creates in the criminal justice system, how should we make sense of this unfortunate reality? Is it simply a case of leveraging law to ensure bargaining of interests between branches of the government or is there a deeper institutional and methodological lacuna that prevents us from evolving a conclusive understanding of procedural parity?

He is relevant because: (i) he is a former CJI, (ii) he is physically and mentally sound enough to still participate in public debate notwithstanding his retirement, (iii) in the quasi-feudal society of India that is Bharat, the likes of him will always be influential gatekeepers of public discourse.

Greetings. I have cleared CLAT 2025 and I had similar questions regarding the internship arrangement, particularly related to NALSAR. Allow me to add some of my own questions too.

1- What are the different ways through which a first-year law student can apply for internships? Is it similar to the general experience in high school where internships are found on applications like Linkedin? Or is it the networking which gains prominence

2- Does the recruitment process

Hi, I’m likely to be joining NLS or NALSAR this year. I would be grateful for guidance on the following as I don’t know any seniors there.

- Is it essential to do 3 internships every single year- can I take a break next summer, for instance (have a sibling’s wedding likely some time in 2026). Or is that a big red flag/missed opportunity for the CV.

- NLS requires the first internship (Feb 2026) to be with an NGO. Does NALSAR have a similar requirement? Does it matter which NGO, from the point of view of subsequent internship applications?

- What’s the minimum duration for an internship? Will the entire semester/trimester break go on an internship, or can I hope for a week or two off.

- As of now, I hope to end up in corporate law. However someone told me that internships in law firms are open only from 3rd year onwards and the earlier internships should mostly be in litigation/with advocates . Is this the case? In that case, what would the ideal mix of internships look like for first and second year, assuming 2-3 internships per year? I’m a bit confused as to how many corporate law internships one should try for and when, considering I also read somewhere that 3rd or 4th year is the crucial year for PPOs and hiring, and that it’s almost all over by 5th. Is this actually how it happens?

- How intense is the selection process for internships for 1st/2nd/3rd year students ? Is it mostly references or is there a structured hiring process for interns with interviews etc.

- What’s the difference between a regular internship, and an assessment internship? What exactly are “callbacks” and when do they happen?

Apologies for all the queries, but I’m a first generation law aspirant and don’t know any seniors as of now, so am just trying to understand this a bit better. Thanks in advance.

there was this dude from gnlu working with the disputes team (delhi) in dec and jan…worked like anything…but afaik they havent rolled out an offer meanwhile the bunch of others working in corp, cap marks in the same month were handed over a ppo. so avoid disputes, they might not be hiring atm!

It may sound like an industry-standard answer, but dude, the scene is really bad because of the market. It’s definitely going to affect BO 26. The only way to secure a PPO is to make yourself visible and be straightforward about the fact that you are looking for one at any firm. I mean, be straightforward in your approach—don’t annoy them, but make it clear to the team what you want. If the team wants to take you, they will, but as of now, the market is really tough. All you can do is pray and be upfront about your needs.

So sorry to hear this. Unfortunately, lawyers, especially those with a hubristic attitude, don’t realise that that a part of their job is to train juniors.

A lot of places have this issue. My suggestion to you would be to continue for sometime, try to get training from a helpful SA/PA. If this doesn’t work, switch.

Bhai, they will keep you in the loop, but there’s no surety. PPOs are difficult to secure. Even if the team gives positive affirmations, it ultimately depends on the partner and the firm’s need. Even if an SA, PA, or Counsel says that there will be space in the team, it all depends on timing and luck.

Also, the market is really bad, and no clear demands have been communicated to the partners about the organization's intake needs.

The only thing you can do is stay in constant touch with the team. Most of the time, it takes 4 to 5 months to schedule PPO interviews. As soon as you receive positive information from your team, contact the HR department and inform them about the affirmations you’ve received. Ask them about the next steps and the process

You don’t see how those two go together? Demanding that others subscribe to the same standards of political correctness as you , that they make the same jokes and believe the same things - and demanding that by threatening legal and political sanctions is by its nature authoritarian.

Do you not know what authoritarianism is or do you not know what political correctness is ?

Recently graduated from a Tier 1 NLU and have also qualified as a Company Secretary. I am seeking opportunities to work under an experienced Advocate at the Jabalpur High Court, preferably someone with a diverse practice. I am willing to commit 12 to 15 hours a day with complete dedication, but I value a polite work environment. Additionally, I would expect a basic stipend of around ₹20,000 per month after an initial training period.

Any suggestions?

As a third-year law student who interned there, I had the opportunity to engage in a variety of work that bridged the gap between law and public policy.

My primary responsibility involved conducting in-depth research on contemporary legal and policy issues. I analyzed legislative frameworks, case laws, and regulatory policies to contribute to comprehensive policy briefs and general research.

I also assisted in preparing briefing materials for MPs and Government stakeholders on topics such as AI regulation, data privacy, and dual use tech.

While the work was pretty good, one of the most valuable aspects of my internship was the mentorship I received from DD, who guided me through the nuances of policy writing and strategic communication. These sessions were pivotal in refining my writing style and understanding the impact of well-crafted policy arguments.

Additionally, my conversations with Dhruv about career pathways in law and public policy were incredibly insightful.

The team at IGAP is incredibly approachable, fostering an inclusive and collaborative work environment. Despite the high standards of work, the office maintains a relaxed atmosphere with flexible timings, there are a lot of team activities and lunches and dinners. Moreover, IGAP pays its interns.

Since they have also grown substantially since I was there, I think if you're interested in policy and government affairs, it's a great place to intern.

I heard from a batchmate that she got rejected for an internship because she messed up a bit during the interview. And from then and there onwards they never gave her another chance. They kept rejecting her application. Irrespective.
Another instance, where I got to know that the attrition rate is high. They may be hiring.