We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
SAM has Meta and Microsoft
Azb has Google
JSA has Apple
These three have also done amazing deals in competition law.
Trilegal is also not a T-1 but since Aparna is joining this month, she'll make it T-1 in no time.
KCO competition stands no where near sam azb and jsa.
- Sent from my iPhone and typed from the Harbour Bar at the Taj, where I am wearing my new Gucci loafers and Omega watch.
Coming from a senior NUJS NRI (genuinely)
To address your specific point: On the contrary, all of us are dancing for knowing that people with water on the brain like you can't achieve half the things he has done (including for NLS).
It's protest time. Abhi nahi toh kabhi nahi.
On top of this there are day scholars in the college and the surrounding area around Cuttack is not safe at all. A zomato delivery boy was killed in front of our college 1.5 years ago at 5 PM.
Mental health issues in the college have been at peak with numerous suicides and suicide attempts in the last 5 years.
There is regular breathalyzer checks when students enter college. They have taken away access from rooms allotted to college committees. Boys are not allowed to drop girls to their hostels since that is against the culture of the college. Juniors cannot go to a seniors room (Under the guise of preventing ragging)
The Admin refuses to communicate. VC is non existent, if she is there she usually makes stuff worse. If we go to registrar he says it is not my department go to concerned people. Dean will outright refuse to communicate.
Surprisingly this mail is one of the more competently and sensibly drafted mail by the dean. This is the standard set by the dean of academics of a national law university.
Mail:
Dear all,
We worked out tutorial time-table yesterday.
1.As of now after engaging empty slots in the time-table, tuorial classes will go till about 8 pm. 7.30 if we remove 5 minutes breaks after 3.30 class. So requests such as I can't come at 9 am and can't stay after 4 pm cannot be entertained.
2. It is not possible to have groups either of 15 or 20 because we do not have enough rooms. SO as of now kindly take tutorial classes of all students in the section to mark attendance.
3. With time table tight from 9 am to 7.30 or 8 pm, there is no option but to take compensatory classes on Saturdays.
4. Whether there will be evaluation for tutorial or not, and if there will be what will be the mode, has to be finalised. The group discussion is not working out in physical mode.
5. Students and faculty PLEASE do not bombard this email account with responses. I wont be reading and replying. Whatever your views and inputs, it needs to be sorted in a different, peaceful and sensible way. I dont have time and energy to engage in endless discussions on mail.
--
Sheela RaiDean Academics
National Law University Odisha
This January ('25), I'll be interning with Khaitan's Mumbai office in the DR Team. It's my first internship there, and I've heard from peers about their "one-internship policy". Could someone clarify what this policy entails? As a 2026 batch student, would I still be eligible for a PPO (or future interviews) if callbacks aren't an option?
I am also the sole earner in my family of 3 now. Mother and father have health issues, and they are unemployed because of that. I have one sibling whose college fee is also to be paid by me, starting next year. Our family survived somehow by using our savings for the last one year when I was in litigation, but now when we had almost nothing, I had to give up on litigation. So I joined a small company in my city as an in-house counsel.
The problem is, I'm learning literally nothing here. Most of the days I'm free and workless, just sitting on my ass staring at the blank screen in my cabin. Once or twice a week they ask me to draft a legal notice or two. Very rarely I've to draft some plaints for recovery. But I'm still getting paid around 25k a month for this "work" which is very useful in my current family circumstances.
On the flipside, everyday was a new learning experience when I was in courts.
All this work I'm doing here can easily be done remotely, yet they still ask me to "work" 10 hours a day in their office. I feel like I've made a massive mistake by going in-house. Are most in-house jobs this mind numbingly boring and unfruitful or is it just my company? Would it be better if I join some small boutique firm instead?
lakshmi menon
1) shivadass and shivadass law chambers - predominantly idt matters
2) lakshmikumaran and sridharan (not a chamber, but a decent tax law exp could help you get in for an internship, they do majority of idt work in india by and large)
3) shreya rao - does dt matters specifically
ThinklawLexconsult
Pioneer
Stratgage
Fountainhead legal
Anb legal
Clove legal
Rajani associates
Aquilaw
Agama legal
Klaw
Anoma legal
Veyrah law
BTG Advaya
MDP Partners
Verist law
Agram legal consultants
India Juris
Anagram Partners
1. Dissatisfaction due to bonuses/salary
2. No growth/Lack of promotions
3. favouritism
4. Not being treated well.
5. More money being offered elsewhere
We should look at historical figures holistically and with nuance. Remember than even Indira Gandhi praised Savarkarβs bravery and patriotism. And in many ways Savarkar was more modern than Gandhi, as he criticised cow worship and expressed atheist views.
busy office
First, claiming that seniority equates to efficiency is not only illogical but also dangerously complacent. Titles are not shields against accountability. The fact that someone has reached a senior position does not automatically exempt them from scrutiny or criticism. Professional capabilities must be consistently demonstrated, not presumed based on rank. equating seniority with efficiency is laughable. A title does not guarantee competence, let alone absolve anyone of inefficiency. If anything, it should invite greater scrutiny, because leadership demands higher standardsβnot a free pass.
Second, your so-called βboat metaphorβ is as irrelevant as it is inaccurate. Pretending that inefficiencies donβt exist at senior levels is delusional. Workflows break down due to poor leadership just as much as execution, and brushing it off with some mythical idea of hierarchy only exposes your unwillingness to address real issues. Let me make it clear: inefficiency at any levelβjunior, senior, or partnerβdeserves to be called out, and defending it under the guise of hierarchy is nothing but a weak excuse.
Finally, as for your argument about CCβing partners on emailsβare we seriously equating being aware of work with actual contribution? Thatβs not engagement; thatβs passive observation. If you believe thatβs how leadership is measured, itβs no wonder inefficiencies persist. It is absurd to suggest that merely being copied on emails is an adequate measure of engagement or accountability.
Your attempt to dismiss valid criticism as βpersonal vindictivenessβ is both unprofessional and baseless. If your idea of professionalism is to suppress legitimate concerns under the pretense of respect for seniority, then perhaps it is time to re-evaluate what efficiency and leadership truly mean.
Stop hiding behind empty defences, stop hiding behind hierarchy and start addressing real issues.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9lC2Nmrlo7c