We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
2027-5 (so far, more incoming)
Khushboo Kumari, RMLNLU (BALLB), NUJS (LLM), PhD (Victoria University of Wellington)
Currently a Lecturer at University of Wakaito, New Zealand
1. There would still be batches of 80 in BALLB. The program would not have expanded. New programs like LLB (3 year) and BA (Hons) wouldn't have started.
2. There wouldn't be hiring of so many faculties and so many faculties would not have migrated from different institutions to NLSIU.
3. The campus redesign and reconstruction wouldn't have happened.
4. There would be a lot of money still being swindled in different forms. That has been stopped to a large extent. We also wouldn't have JSW grants or Luthra Grant that we recieved.
The batchsize of 80, with very few faculty would ensure its a close knit institution. Academic rigour would be much lesser.
There's a lot of hate that NLS receives, both from it's own students because of how hectic life is there, and from outsiders, largely due to their envy. The former generally pin it on Sudhir, who also saw protests against him recently (questionable if they fixed anything). But it makes one wonder if NLS would hold on to the tag of the best law school in the country if not for him.
Do NLS grads think they would be better off without him? Why, or why not? We've also heard he's had corruption charges against him- are any of it substantial? What about Rhodes, which ONLY NLS students are able to bag because of his lobbying? Or the funds that keep pouring in because of his contacts? Is there any possibility he'd leave or be thrown out in the near future, or is he here to stay for another couple of decades?
Us ? We just want others to have a gloomy picture of NLIU but no actual weight to it.
Given their state of affairs, are they planning to bump up their pay this time? Last I check on this platform, it was running at ~20-25% lower than t-1s at all levels. They aspired to be competing with Trilegal at some point. But to draw such talent, is the pay really as competitive?
Also, are the supposed openings actually true or is it just a farce to show they are hiring? What's the work hours like lately especially at mid level? Does the pay differ across teams? Bonus? Want to understand if it's lucrative enough for someone looking for an exit from a well-paying big 6 job to apply here. Could someone with a clearer picture about the place please help? Thank you.
I have saved up about 1Cr for the flat but the destination still seems far away. You don't find anything good (1200 sq ft) for less than 6cr nowadays and for couples where both are not earning partner salaries I have no idea how people are affording 4-5lakh EMIs, especially with a child in int school and annual holidays. Am I just better off renting my 3bhk for 1.7L instead?
Let's exchange notes.
Let us separate fact from fantasy.
I have no difficulty conceding that:
A. He seems a perfectly agreeable chap .. a chip off the old block, perhaps.
B. He can articulate a reasonably coherent argument in fluent English.
Fine. But civilisation has never regarded basic competence and good manners as qualifications for greatness.
What he manifestly is not, however, is:
A. A leading Indian jurist.
B. A distinguished or internationally renowned figure in arbitration.
These are not titles to be bestowed out of filial affection or social deference. They are earned through an exceptional body of work, landmark cases, scholarly influence, and international recognition. So by all means, produce the facts, the figures, the accolades, the jurisprudential contributions. Where are they?
Or are we once again expected to mistake a surname for substance?
One of the more depressing features of Indian public life is this almost feudal instinct to prostrate oneself before inherited prestige. Merit is assumed, excellence imputed, eminence proclaimed .. all because the right genes and the right dinner invitations are involved. That may satisfy the courtiers. It does not constitute evidence.
As for your rather careless invocation of the term “chapri”, one is entitled to ask precisely what, or whom, you had in mind. The category remains conveniently nebulous. Are you referring to JGLS? To the Faculty of Law, GLC or ILS? To NLS and the other NLUs? Or perhaps to Nirma, LPU, Amity and their ilk? The ambiguity is striking. If you intend to cast aspersions, have the courage and intellectual honesty to do so plainly. Come clean. Vagueness is often the refuge of those unwilling to defend the implications of their own words.
What's so special about this one that it warrants a seperate thread?
And reappointment no guarantee that he would not enter politics
All law officers are free to resign whenever they please
or recently got any?
any assessmennt interbships or traineeships?
please share
I am a 2026 graduate from a good university and have been trying my best to secure a job for the past year.
I sat for a pre-placement offer interview around 4–5 months ago and was rejected. I interviewed for an in-house position through college and was rejected there as well. I sent countless cold emails, managed to land an interview with a Tier-2 law firm, and got rejected again. The frustrating part is that the interview actually went really well.
At this point, I genuinely do not know what else to do. Every rejection makes me feel like I am disappointing myself, my family, and everyone who believed in me. I keep trying different approaches, but nothing seems to be working.
Is anyone else in the same boat? More importantly, which corporate law firms are actually hiring Associate 0s right now?
Any leads, advice, or even shared experiences would be appreciated because I am honestly feeling quite lost.
How exactly does this work? If you've interned with a particular team, received very positive feedback from them, but did not receive a PPO (hiring freeze) is there still a possibility of being hired by that same team through dayz recruitment or will you end up getting hired by a different team?
Should other NLUs follow and indulge in such marketing too?