We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Can my learned friends here please shed light on the working hours in chamber practise? Thanks.
Speaking to such spirits is not that easy or we can say nearly impossible. But certainly, this way of sitting with candle and doing it is just NOTHING!!
Mail:
Dear all
Sending these type of hate mails doesn't help. I am responding to make just one statement. Any faculty that VC wants who is 'flexible' enough can be made Dean Academics. I have already stated this to VC number of times. I have rejected to be VC in charge 3 times in my career in two different universities and also given up registrar's position. So rest assured I don't enjoy this. I have been on the side of power since the day I was born so I know it's reality.
As long as I am there I won't agree to standards stooping to lower level than they already are thanks to 'flexible' and so called 'student friendly' (or student appeasement) policies of some who have been associated with the university. Since you hardly know anything about how universities work, I am informing that I don't appease because I am academically and financially honest and don't have skeletons in my cupboard.
So instead of writing unnecessary mails here and wasting time prepare yourself for the hard life and competition ahead. These mails do not affect me. And I won't respond further
Cantabil is also good
The common response is that I need experience, but when I reach out to counsels to join their chambers, their juniors tell me to gain experience by working in a law firm. I was ready to not expect any monetary compensation in litigation. I know how litigation is. But even in small law firms you donβt get paid.
And guess what, I have seen few people directly join chambers of some renowned lawyers directly after graduation. And then I found out about their whole family background.
It's a vicious cycle. Law firms want experience, but the only way to get that experience is by working in a law firm. I'm caught in a loop with no clear way out. Some small law firms even mentioned that I must work for 24:7 with no pay and no weekend off.
I've also offered to work for free to gain experience in litigation, but even that hasn't yielded any opportunities.
I'm starting to regret pursuing law. I wish I had taken my entrance exams like CLAT more seriously, despite getting into a good institution through MHCET. However, they didn't have a strong placement program. No doubt people give up on this career.
I'm not blaming anyone entirely, but I realize I must be lacking somewhere. Then why donβt they give me feedback instead of vague responses.
Despite doing well academically and securing good internships, I'm not getting anywhere.
Everyone I ask for help seems so so insecure and unwilling to offer guidance, recommendations or feedback. I'm feeling frustrated and lost. Itβs literally taking toll on my mental health.
Also I met few people who are so insecure and threatened in law school and in legal industry. And sometimes I feel this whole industry is like this. Judge me I do not care. I am so done!
https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/held-hostage-for-40-hours-youtuber-ankush-bahugunas-digital-arrest-ordeal-7405352
I just don't get it! We are warned every day.. why do they fall for these scams then?
Even if you were to meet a family oriented, make-your-own-bread milk-your-own-cow type of homesteader usually portrayed on "tradwife" spaces- she likely wouldnt be interested in someone who plans to slave for corporate overlords, not take an active role in raising children or who wouldnt know how to fix a light bulb let alone build her a house. Indian men want the women to be "family oriented" instead of career oriented, but they themselves arent similarly family oriented at all. What they want is a bangmaid, not a marriage.
What you mean is that you are incapable of being a good husband and want to marry someone who is poorer and less financially stable than you are in hopes that she will put up with your bad behaviour all her life. She might. She might also find out that its not worth it. Just be honest though- dont use euphemisms to disguise your own shortcomings.
https://www.news18.com/business/unmarried-couples-no-longer-welcome-oyo-changes-check-in-rules-9177563.html
'if u want to impress others you are in the wrong business", i dont want to impress anyone but it hurts when people are not impressed'
If you want to be happy, maybe reflect a bit. If you don't want to, that's fine. Many people go through life obsessed with external validation.
I donβt know if itβs easier to get into Harvard for a phd or nls. Maybe the former might have fewer applicants but it still might be more competitive and demand more from applicants to even be considered than NLS does. Acceptance rates only tell one bit of the story. They tell you how many others applied. They donβt tell you how many of the others that applied were serious applicants, they donβt tell you how good the other applicants were - nothing. If you went by acceptance rate alone, everyone working in the services should be a genius and given the small number of people who are ever even nominated for the MacArthur grant, it must be quite easy to get .
Honestly I donβt care either way. Itβs the work you do during your phd that matters to me, whether itβs interesting or novel or rigorous, not necessarily the institution. But I will say - on average institutions in the west demand more rigor from the work of their phd students than institutions in India do.
I was a defense aspirant (wanted to be an infantry officer) but have weak eyesight and bad in maths so gave up on NDA and went for NEET hoping to join the Army Medical Corps. I dropped for NEET this year (2024) but it was simply not for me. I was getting a shitty off campus college in DU through CUET and almost went there (hoping to give CDS on graduation) but the college was simply trash. A friend whose dad is a judge suggested CLAT (and I have always been kinda interested in law) so I initially wanted to go for either JAG or judiciary but the sheer amount of money that you make in law firms is tempting me.
Personally, it has always been my dream to serve as a commissioned army officer, preferably in the combat arms, more preferably the infantry, but I understand that is not possible for me anymore.
I have 5 years to decide on my future path but for now I think I will either go for a law firm head on or try for JAG and live out my dream, albeit on a limited scale.
Either way, I wholeheartedly thank you again for your kind and informative answer, I shall keep coming back to it for future reference :)
Hard to tell from the outside looking in, since so many firms talk about India on their websites, and rankings can get skewed too.
https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/gst-notice-issued-to-tamil-nadu-pani-puri-seller-over-rs-40-lakh-earnings-7403011#pfrom=home-ndtv_lateststories
"Manoeuvre Education ". Not a promotion, but its the only channel which helps in this aspect of knowing syllabus of MHCET.
As, its a state exam, so LE, CL and LPT these coachings don't guide for 3year LLB. So, you may get an idea from there.