NLSIU remains at the top because Sudhir has rescued the college from its decline by hiring great faculty and attracting private funding.

But should NALSAR and NUJS follow?

Why not NLUD and GNLU, which also have the twin advantages of location. Delhi is the freaking judicial capital and Gujarat is the top-growing state right now (foreign investments, Olympics, Coldplay, what not).

Then Jindal has a never ending flow of funds, an owner who knows the who’s who of India, and super-rich and super-connected students. All of this is helping its students get good jobs and also study abroad and settle there. Then the faculty is much better than all NLUs, except NLSIU.

So do you people still believe than the rankings of 2024 should be the same as the rankings of 2014?

The current status is that the Delhi High Court has sent a notice to the Centre. I don’t expect any action because the people who buy Coldplay tickets are probably not BJP voters, and even if they are they are too small to count. 500,000 is a huge number in the West and can actually swing election results in the US, but it is too small a number in India. Just a couple of slums in Delhi or Mumbai or Kolkata alone will have that population.

This is the same reason why the government imposes high income taxes: the upper-middle class is too small to count.

That said, the government does take seriously even a small number of people if they burn buses, block roads and throw stones at buildings. So maybe that can be an option for Coldplay fans.

Absolute third-rate hitpiece by an unknown, biased and ignorant writer: full of falsehoods, fallacies and errors. Typical of the Caravan to publish such nonsense. The fact is that the far-left/woke left have been nursing a grudge against Chandrachud ever since the Ayodhya judgement. What they would have liked is an order handing back the land to the Muslim community and ordering the mosque to be rebuilt.

I am 2nd year law student, I have been getting interested in competition law from some time, reading random blogs and papers on it, but i don't know how to formally enter this realm, like how should I study competition law in a structured manner? Which books do you recommend and how should I find topics to research upon for publications?

Hi everyone. I was thinking about doing law after MBA. In detail,

After my 12th in 2016, I had scored enough to get in GLC for 5 year LLB. But my parents forced me to go in engineering. Post my engineering, I completed my MBA from a top 10 BSchool in the country. Right now I work at one of the Big 4. But I am not happy with the work I am doing. I am getting a good amount of money, but I still feel very unsatisfied with my work. I was thinking to give NLSAT/MHCET next year and take admission for 3 year LLB. What will be my prospects there? Also, my age will be 26 when I start my LLB. So that will be one more disadvantage. I want to work with a Tier 1 law firm for a few years and then set up my own practice. I am particularly interested in constitutional law.

NUJS is a useful point of comparison. Clearly, if you are a NUJS alum (likely from the wording of this) and don't recognise that, law school has taught nothing to you about how to manage your ego.

Why don't you go back to Mamata's office and confess you couldn't do your job? Considering how leftist she is, you may still get your paycheck!

My good arse, I am not the original one who made that comment, but I am someone who knows about Bengal and its politics, knows about NUJS and hates Modi. That comment is perfectly accurate. If you don't recognise it for what it is, clearly NUJS has taught nothing about ego control.

An SLC alumni here, I can vouch for the course. The course, as mentioned by many here, is conducted by Partners from Law firms, SEBI officers and other equally experienced people, for e.g. the whole CM team of CAM is a faculty for one of the modules. I recommend not taking this course if you are not experienced or are not familiar with the securities market.

You have to face an interview to qualify for the course by the same panel. Hence, the batch that it constitutes is of highly experienced individuals in the field, along with many students having pre-requisite knowledge about the subject. The main objective of the participants eventually turn out to socialise and network.

My 2 cents would be to question yourself -

1. Can you scoop out enough time to dedicate to the course; 3 times a week for about 8 months and complete all the exams, presentations and research papers without hassle?

2. Do you have basic knowledge (above average in my opinion) to understand the faculty or even your batchmates?

3. Will this course add anything to your knowledge?

If you are affirmative with the answers, please go ahead and enrol yourself but if not, do not eat up a seat of a deserving or another candidate who needs it more than you.

https://www.reddit.com/r/BollyBlindsNGossip/comments/1gshmko/karan_wasnt_traumatised_because_he_was_selling/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=mweb3x&utm_name=mweb3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

Average Fresher rambling at offsite

This question has been asked before but hasn’t received much actionable advice, so I’m posting again. How can one transition from an LPO role to a law firm after 1–1.5 years of experience? I’m keen to make the switch as soon as possible to avoid the risk of losing touch with knowledge related to Indian laws.

It won't be the same with Nisha and her team gone. They should have tied up with JSA.

So far, the editions have been really good. A good quality moot problem with decent judges.

The arrangement wrt stay and food, is not that good though. It doesn't bother me but to some, it might.

I interned with them fairly recently, albeit in a different practice area. Hybrid capacity. No stipend. Upon inquiring, I was duly informed by their HR (great group of people btw) that they are currently not looking to hire at the A0 level. Hence, I could not push for an assessment there.

the TT&A culture is quite weird. The entire B&F partnership cluster in Mumbai are glorified PAs to Sonali and the entire B&F/M&A partnership cluster in Delhi NCR are glorified PAs to Gautam.

KT seems to be a little offboard and parleys huge disconnect in terms of the dynamics within the firm at large.

They'll hate point 1 (assumption is that you'll end up asking for long leaves down the line) and love point 2 (easier to offer you less money since you'll be desperate as you need to pay your loans). Be careful with what you reveal during your negotiations. Also, do ask about bonus (whether it's discretionary, how much it is etc)

Even my Tier 2/ boutique standards, pay is low at associate level.

Good set of clients. Not too crazy hours. Teammates are polite.

Founder stays in the US and runs the firm like a US company/ travels occasionally to India. There have been multiple exits recently, so that regular churn can affect workload and team dynamics.

Pay is better at higher levels.